HOME | DD
Published: 2004-10-06 09:51:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 313; Favourites: 0; Downloads: 68
Redirect to original
Description
huzzah. new ID.Lyrics: the postal service - nothing better
stupid comments at the top: me + double chocolate chip cookies
Related content
Comments: 27
pixiepain In reply to voxpopulivoxdie [2006-04-30 16:42:14 +0000 UTC]
You got bored so you're going through my entire gallery? There are much more interesting thing's to do when bored, I promise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pixiepain In reply to MedicatedMoments [2004-10-10 21:34:44 +0000 UTC]
the mallory <3 the jen
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chilledmonkey [2004-10-07 19:56:56 +0000 UTC]
wow this is lobEly
although i couldnt understnad the whole i think i might of got the gist of it
doesnt matter though, just so long as i tried to no?
yeah dont try to contradict me, i know you yeah you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pixiepain In reply to chilledmonkey [2004-10-07 20:39:57 +0000 UTC]
lol, what dont you understand? the song? the songs great. download and listen, and love
contradict you? me?! never.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cei- [2004-10-07 18:36:02 +0000 UTC]
Is probably naked?
Why not "Is naked"? It's much more fun that way.
I keep being tempted to poxe the pixels.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pixiepain In reply to cei- [2004-10-07 18:42:52 +0000 UTC]
because sometimes i'm at college. and they sort of frown on the nakedness during lessons.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cei- In reply to pixiepain [2004-10-07 18:48:27 +0000 UTC]
Tut. What kind of crap college do you go to?
....I should shut up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pixiepain In reply to cei- [2004-10-07 18:52:01 +0000 UTC]
the kind of crap college where the toilets are single sex...i mean...the fudge is the use in that?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cei- In reply to pixiepain [2004-10-07 18:59:29 +0000 UTC]
Shocking. Ours were single-sex, but being a boy's school it would have been slightly pointless having toilets for girls.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pixiepain In reply to cei- [2004-10-07 20:37:21 +0000 UTC]
ever so slightly. although, having said that, my old school was all girls and we had one boys toilet. it was mysterious and unexplainable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pixiepain In reply to anorexiccow [2004-10-06 21:27:30 +0000 UTC]
lmfao. dont be so sarcastic, it's mean!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pixiepain In reply to Lysergix [2004-10-06 21:05:36 +0000 UTC]
yes, because it's been run through thousands of filters and had lots of tweaking imposed on it.
and have i mentioned how very flattering you are?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lysergix In reply to pixiepain [2004-10-07 05:43:25 +0000 UTC]
..hey hey your pretty i'm just saying you don't look your usual self... you still look pretty there dearest
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pixiepain In reply to Lysergix [2004-10-07 07:47:28 +0000 UTC]
urg. the word 'pretty' in itself offends me. nevermind, I get what you're trying to say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lysergix In reply to pixiepain [2004-10-07 15:25:41 +0000 UTC]
ah good good, and why does pretty offend you? i would of said your hot, but it seems rather... well like, cheesy.. yeah you get it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pixiepain In reply to Lysergix [2004-10-07 17:48:40 +0000 UTC]
because pretty is...shallow and fluffy and pink and girly. and i'd hate to think people associate me with those qualities.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pixiepain In reply to SC-Yoshimitsu [2004-10-06 20:57:41 +0000 UTC]
? whats phwoar-ish? which part is inspiring phwoar? i like phwoar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SC-Yoshimitsu In reply to pixiepain [2004-10-06 21:25:48 +0000 UTC]
I don't think Yoshimitsu has to explain the obvious. Just to recap, Phwoar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SC-Yoshimitsu In reply to pixiepain [2004-10-06 22:55:50 +0000 UTC]
I find your confusion Phwoar inducing.
This post was brought to you by the letter Phwoar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
























