HOME | DD

PrehistoryByLiam — Proboscidea Size Chart

#age #americanum #cenozoic #chart #elephant #elephants #evolution #falconeri #gomphothere #holocene #ice #iceage #loxodonta #mammals #mammoth #mammoths #mammut #mastodon #miocene #paleo #paleoart #paleontology #pleistocene #proboscis #sciart #scientificillustration #size #trunk #tusks #woolly
Published: 2018-12-18 14:31:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 75606; Favourites: 815; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Here are all the extinct proboscideans I have reconstructed, the culmination of about 2 months of work. Just to clarify this is my first attempt at a size chart and as you can see under the title, I've made a point of mentioning this is only roughly to scale. I pretty much eyeballed it based on skeletals and my individual reconstructions, so let me know if anything looks wildly off base. They all look pretty good as far as resolution goes, except for Moeritherium for some reason. 
From left to right (based on the very front of the animal, so Moeritherium goes before Platybelodon and Zygolophodon goes before P. falconeri thanks to those incredibly long tusks):
Moeritherium
Platybelodon
Gomphotherium
Deinotherium
Lyuba
Woolly mammoth
Measurement Man
Palaeoloxodon namadicus
Zygolophodon
Palaeoloxodon falconeri
American mastodon
Cuvieronius
Barytherium

This is the most in-depth effort I've ever made for a single group of animals, and I learned quite a lot about the principles of scientific reconstruction, the "paleoart status quo", and proboscideans/elephants in general. I'll probably make a journal right after uploading this, in which case I'll link it. I would've reconstructed more species (Columbian mammoth for example) but I felt I was kinda running out of gas, and what better way to end than with the most famous extinct proboscidean? Thank you all for your support and encouragement, I loved reading your reactions to each crazy genus. Comment below which one you like best!
Related content
Comments: 58

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to ??? [2018-12-18 15:15:12 +0000 UTC]

I updated it, how's it look now?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaprosuchusDragon In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2018-12-18 15:43:13 +0000 UTC]

better

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Artlover1214 [2018-12-18 14:34:33 +0000 UTC]

I definitely would've loved to see a woolly mammoth specimen of that size. Pretty sure that rivals the siegsdorf bull.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Artlover1214 In reply to Artlover1214 [2018-12-18 23:20:23 +0000 UTC]

Well, talking about the head height here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Artlover1214 [2018-12-18 15:15:36 +0000 UTC]

Yeah you're right, I definitely made it too big. How's it look now?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Artlover1214 In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2018-12-18 18:01:00 +0000 UTC]

Definitely better but it looks like its topping 3.5 meters however I could be completely wrong

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Artlover1214 [2018-12-18 19:12:45 +0000 UTC]

Keep in mind the longer hairs and fatty hump I gave it will make it look bigger than your typical woolly mammoth reconstruction

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |