HOME | DD

prosaix — dep0rnification

Published: 2012-01-23 17:51:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 10994; Favourites: 662; Downloads: 40
Redirect to original
Description A satire of the retarded skyqeen's insipid 'stamps' that she's been shitting lately.

If you don't know what 'stamps' I'm referring to, look at one of the popular pages, say last 3 days. There's bound to be one there.


Anyway don't forget to fave this durrrr because it's totes awesome and this deserves 10000+


No egos were harmed during the making of this stamp. Also, please, no harassment! DO NOT STEAL MY STAMP!

MORE:
Related content
Comments: 625

ponikos In reply to ??? [2012-03-19 19:05:49 +0000 UTC]

It is Photography.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

prosaix In reply to ponikos [2012-03-19 19:10:26 +0000 UTC]

So photograph isn't art?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ponikos In reply to prosaix [2012-03-19 19:13:53 +0000 UTC]

In a way, I suppose

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Abornoth In reply to ponikos [2012-05-19 04:09:08 +0000 UTC]

Bullcrap.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BunnyHopp In reply to ponikos [2012-03-25 21:22:59 +0000 UTC]

I'm not a photographer myself, but it most definitely is an art form. It's capturing a moment for artistic purposes, posing someone or something in a specific lighting to create a mood that the artist was trying to express through realistic imagery.

Of course, not all photographs are artistic nor were given much attention to, but the same can be said for drawings, like stick figures and such.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lubnArt In reply to ??? [2012-03-15 19:34:29 +0000 UTC]

i like nude art, and even nude art that explores relationships- but PORN should be somewhere else!
coz its annoying having to browse all the crap in search of something nice also maybe it should nearly ALL be in the artistic nude category... too much of it isn't

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Lilithay In reply to lubnArt [2012-05-25 12:18:11 +0000 UTC]

Agreed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JellyFaceJade In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 01:47:55 +0000 UTC]

There shouldn't be an artistic nudes category, they are girls just posing naked, like sluts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lubnArt In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-03-16 05:48:54 +0000 UTC]

you think a women expressing or exploring her right to personal bodily freedom makes the woman a slut?
i don't think you know what the word slut actually means,
are you a virgin?
because i am.. i've never so much as kissed some one.. oh wait.. even held hands with someone..
BUT I've taken a photo of myself naked before- and affirmed my right to do so- as i should have control over my own body..
but i would find it odd that you think you can call me a slut for it- and ignore people that the name MIGHT suit a bit more...
i personally thing the word slut is used inappropriatly.. and if it is used men that use it should also be able to look at men as being sluts too
if that's the case... or are you talking about porn? which is it nude art or porn...
if its nude art... are your opinions effected by religion? because religion cant be used in a valid argument as far as i'm concerned
i find that for some women- particularly in some places on earth- cultures reinforced by religious beliefs and values oppress and even enslave. but then if your a man.. what would you possibly know about that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

JellyFaceJade In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 18:01:31 +0000 UTC]

I am not a virgin. I have had sex, I just think women shouldn't show off their bodies, unless they are having sex, or are having a bath. I kiss, and fucked people. There is no such thing as nude art. It's all naked women, showing off their bodies, being sluttish.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

lubnArt In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-03-16 20:47:53 +0000 UTC]

- oh... also ..these women are not 'showing off' in some sort of vain way - granted perhaps some people are.. but art in a lot of categories can be like that- its not 'nude art' thats the problem there

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

JellyFaceJade In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 21:09:28 +0000 UTC]

leave me alone. I am getting very pissed off right now. go away.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lubnArt In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-03-16 21:11:52 +0000 UTC]

bye little girl.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

lubnArt In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 21:23:23 +0000 UTC]

your not a little girl?
and your telling ME i need to get over myself-
when at the same time you say 'please just leave me alone- leave me alone' -.. OK.. so if its that big a deal- why do u reply.. hmmm i think we could have just agreed we wont way anything to the other person.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JellyFaceJade In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 21:13:49 +0000 UTC]

I'm not a little girl! I am 18, meaning I am a teen. So please just leave me the hell alone. Stop commenting, and get over yourself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilithay In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-05-25 12:16:55 +0000 UTC]

In your argument, then, men shouldn't be allowed to walk around topless. Also, according to what you said, any girl who puts on a swimsuit and goes to the beach is now a slut. The women who rather bravely posed for breast cancer awareness after going through hours and hours of painful treatment are also now sluts.

A slut is someone who sleeps around. The human body is an amazing and beautiful creation.

You sound pretty much like a misogynist to me. If you're actually gonna get pissed off because some random internet stranger disagrees with your narrow-minded viewpoint then you should probably get off the internet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JellyFaceJade In reply to Lilithay [2012-05-25 14:41:11 +0000 UTC]

Yeah that is right they are all sluts. You shouldn't pose naked for anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilithay In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-05-26 00:23:09 +0000 UTC]

Then, as I said, you miss are a misogynist. A self-hating female, how nice. Or, perhaps you're just so insecure with your own body that you get offended by the concept. A lot of girls with image issues seem to have big problems when other women or men are comfortable in their own skin. Either way, you're narrow minded, expressing yourself as uneducated, and coming off as quite resentful and bitter. Frankly, I feel sorry for you, and for the state of society, because if people like you are still around then the world's in a sorry state.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JellyFaceJade In reply to Lilithay [2012-05-27 17:17:24 +0000 UTC]

Goodbye, I don't hate myself. I hate everyone on this planet who is a girl, and shows her body. It's not right. Enjoy your life, and you are banned from me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkUmbreon21 In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-07-17 05:08:27 +0000 UTC]

Hmm,what about drawing wise?
Just saying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JellyFaceJade In reply to DarkUmbreon21 [2012-07-23 19:47:23 +0000 UTC]

No! Not any sort of porn. It's not right kids come on here more than adults.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkUmbreon21 In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-07-23 19:57:18 +0000 UTC]

I suppose,but drawing girls naked is not always porn it can be just a expression of emotions,just saying.
I guess i would be count as a slut too because i like to draw girls naked.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JellyFaceJade In reply to DarkUmbreon21 [2012-07-24 15:12:05 +0000 UTC]

Yes it is always porn. If you can see her naked it is porn. Yes you would, because that isn't right. You have something wrong with you if you really want to do that. It's gross. Why people do it I have no fucking idea! Your all just stupid I guess.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkUmbreon21 In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-07-24 17:27:32 +0000 UTC]

LOL,wow talk about closed minded as fuck.
Porn usually involves something sexual, and if she's just standing naked than its not consider "porn"
To be honest there is something wrong with you,you probably have some sort of insecurities or some shit because you hate seeing other women naked.
I'm not stupid,in fact i think the only stupid one here is you,but i digress.
Just because i draw other women naked does not make me a "slut" do you know what a slut is?Its a woman that pays for free sex, drawing naked chicks is not free sex,because 1. I'm not sexually interacting with the male/female gender 2.The drawing itself cannot magically "have sex with a real person"
Besides i don't think it's gross at all,and i'm still a virgin mind you.
What is right to you?Are you some stuck up closed minded christian or some shit?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JellyFaceJade In reply to DarkUmbreon21 [2012-07-25 22:44:24 +0000 UTC]

No porn is if you can wank over it! I'm just modest you people don't know what that means. Now you are blocked goodbye you fucking whore, have a nice whore like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lubnArt In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 20:48:36 +0000 UTC]

actually.. ive just seen that youve called women in nuce art.. sluttish again- so im dropping this conversation

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lubnArt In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-03-16 20:42:38 +0000 UTC]

why do u say that-
when some people would say that most categories on da aren't art?
what makes nude any less valuable-
compared with...
a fan art and unoriginal story-
a portrait of a clothed person-
a picture of a flower- the flower did the hard work not the photographer/painter
realistic paintings- because thats what photography is for
manga is a cartoon- illustrations and art are separate things
art is unimportant compared to lived experience
^above= an example of that type of thinking so what makes these categories any more valuable?
i value lots of categories...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

lubnArt In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 20:54:40 +0000 UTC]

... you say women 'showing off' i dunno how a women can do that in a bath.. but anyway... should be restricted to sex?
so- to the dude you fuck... why? your thinking inside some sort of man made box...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lubnArt In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 21:02:05 +0000 UTC]

anyway- this is actually a draining conversation. so i said i wont reply anymore and i wont.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JellyFaceJade In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 20:46:26 +0000 UTC]

Because they are actual art. Like, fanfic, is for people who want to write stories about people in movies, and TV shows. They is also one for people who just write stories. That's art, because someone took the time to do that. Stop commenting back, I am bored of you already.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lubnArt In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-03-16 21:07:19 +0000 UTC]

oh its LAUGHABLE something is for someone who want something so its art?
well then i guess nude art is art!
WHAT!! are you saying it doesnt take time to produce a photograph? your looking at the wrong pictures!! that logic does now work so i took a long time to plot murdering my mother- its an act of art.. brilliant...
hay you keep bringing things up!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JellyFaceJade In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 21:08:40 +0000 UTC]

Will you please go away.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shinedust In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-03-20 00:14:01 +0000 UTC]

I'm not trying to get into your weird little argument thing here, I would just like to point out that not all nude art is of women. There are plenty of men that model in nude art as well, there have even be DD's of them as well. & I would also like to say that a model is called a model, not a slut, because it is in fact a real profession. I am not saying all women who take naked photographs are models, but I am saying that you should respect the women that are. You should also respect another human's right to do whatever they want with their own bodies as long as it is within the legal realms of right and wrong.

There is a lot of nude work on dA that I don't agree with it, and mostly it is the phonecam crap and the duck-face-girls, but that doesn't mean that there isn't very creative, sometimes politically or morally charged, nude art in the world. Just saying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JellyFaceJade In reply to shinedust [2012-03-20 01:12:18 +0000 UTC]

Good point there. There are, and that really shouldn't be here either. It is just a person naked.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shinedust In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-03-20 01:18:45 +0000 UTC]

Real nude art should be on dA, there is nothing in dA's policy that states that it is not allowed at all. There are very specific rules that dA has based on American laws. & real nude art isn't just a naked person, you're free to see it that way, but that doesn't necessarily make it true to anyone but you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JellyFaceJade In reply to shinedust [2012-03-20 01:20:54 +0000 UTC]

Yeah that's what's bad about this site. Sorry, but once I start I can't stop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shinedust In reply to JellyFaceJade [2012-03-20 01:25:44 +0000 UTC]

There are other art sites, no one is forcing you to be here. Other people shouldn't be forced to stifle their creativity because you're offended when someone loses their clothing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lubnArt In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 05:50:09 +0000 UTC]

oh and they are not girls they are women but hay judging people that like non porn artistic nude- or the models makes you a little boy, because only boys judge people they dont know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lubnArt In reply to lubnArt [2012-03-16 05:53:56 +0000 UTC]

oh your female? and your 19 too.. i just realised. ok. if i knew you were 19 i probably would not have replyed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jessicutie [2012-03-11 22:28:45 +0000 UTC]

I do agree with this. Porn overall is just for entertainment (in my opinion) and does not hold much artistic value no matter how well drawn/written/photographed it is.
Some twat blocked me when I said nude art is okay here and called me stupid and 'one of them sluts'. Hello? Nudity can be symbolic of vulnerability or other things in art. Just because someone's naked doesn't mean it's erotic. Geez.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

amosbeck [2012-03-11 02:14:05 +0000 UTC]

Seriously just lost a bit of respect for you for your use of the word "retard".

Looks nice though, and totally agree.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

prosaix In reply to amosbeck [2012-03-11 02:15:59 +0000 UTC]

It's okay, I use it all the time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dew-13 [2012-03-08 20:38:58 +0000 UTC]

like we say here, Bravo!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JellyFaceJade In reply to ??? [2012-03-08 02:57:27 +0000 UTC]

I am so glad there are others Thank you lord, for here is my light Don't believe in the guy. I'm an atheist myself! But I accept people for who they are. Sorry

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dewinthesky In reply to ??? [2012-03-03 22:14:57 +0000 UTC]

your stamps are awesome, so i think i will watch you or add you to my deviant Watch! only if its up to you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

prosaix In reply to dewinthesky [2012-03-03 23:25:33 +0000 UTC]

Err?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dewinthesky In reply to prosaix [2012-03-04 06:34:58 +0000 UTC]

i just wanted to say i like your stamps.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Starlight-Fallz [2012-02-01 17:42:14 +0000 UTC]

so true

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CrimzonLogic In reply to ??? [2012-01-30 04:45:04 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sotkettu In reply to ??? [2012-01-27 17:45:18 +0000 UTC]

Her stamps are terrible but at least her 'stamps' are not in the stamps category and she does not put her stamps in every stamp group like really many terrible stamp makers do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>