HOME | DD
prosaix — dep0rnification
Published: 2012-01-23 17:51:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 11008; Favourites: 662; Downloads: 40
Redirect to original
Description
A satire of the retarded skyqeen's insipid 'stamps' that she's been shitting lately.
If you don't know what 'stamps' I'm referring to, look at one of the popular pages, say last 3 days. There's bound to be one there.
Anyway don't forget to fave this durrrr because it's totes awesome and this deserves 10000+
No egos were harmed during the making of this stamp. Also, please, no harassment! DO NOT STEAL MY STAMP!
MORE:
Related content
Comments: 625
All you have to do is turn on your mature content filter. It might keep you from getting your panties in such a wad.
Your throbbing penis avatar is awesome by the way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dang. And I thought it was a snail.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Now you've ruined it for me.
Nice uh, snail.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You know, just because you don't like nudity doesn't mean you have to get upset and start ranting or protesting it's existence on this site. You have a filter, so use it.
I could understand the protesting if you didn't have a filter, but you do, so there is no reason to complain about it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Way to go. This stamp is a joke. It's hilarious that you couldn't be bothered to read the description before gettingon your soap box and preaching
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I did. And if you practiced what you preached about reading before you respond you'd know that when I replied Prosaix comment to me. You'd also know that I came to the conclusion that it was a joke in my final comment to him/her.
Besides that, even if I hadn't realized later that it was a joke, how is telling someone that there is a filter button preaching?
You want preaching so bad that you have to assume people are preaching? Then go see a priest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you had read first you would have never made that comment that I replied to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your must be a troll, arguing for the sake of arguing. I must admit I've never encountered one before. I see why people get frustrated with people like you.
When intelligent or normal people try to explain themselves you trolls simply counter with a statement that has already been countered before hand making you appear as an utter idiot.
I'm sorry for your condition.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Your must be a troll" I'm not but the fact that you said that makes it apparent that you have been offended.
"Intellegent or normal" What are you implying with the "normal" bit?
You tried your best to appear superior and smart but your typos and idiotic statements gave your meager intellect away.
I feel sorry for people like you that give a huge fuck about how others percieve them online. It leads me to believe you have trouble being respected and appreciated in the real world.
I'm sorry for your inability to not give a fuck about what people you'll never meet say.
If I was a troll, I would have been successful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hm, this would be the point where I counter your statement, but, quite frankly, I've already forgotten what this meaningless argument was about. I know I could read back, but it's not worth the effort.
So, congratulations you win an argument with someone online. Someone you will likely never run into on this site again, and will never meet in real life, or on any other site. Good luck in whatever endeavors it is you wish to succeed in. I'd give you a thumbs up with it, but I honestly never took the time to learn how to work those emoticons, and I never will.
Good bye, floating eyeball.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Because On DA, IF you put the filter on, you'll never see awesome art like this kind of art : [link]
To be able to see those kind of wonderful piece, You have to seethumbnails of bad and dirty art with anthro girls being raped by ugly tentacles .... <_<
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I guess you have a point there. But those are the pieces many of the people who complain consider 'porn' anyways. Unfortunately if the whole 'porn' thing was gone, it wouldn't just be disgusting images as you've described being removed, it would probably also be the art you provided a link for.
There's no real barrier between the two anyways, besides one's personal perception. We might find one to be art and the other to be porn, but another person might find them both to be art, or both to be porn. Just like there is people who consider photography to not be a form of art, and people who do. It's all about perception.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I strongly disagree your first paragraph.
Porn and Artistic nude are not the same. All Nudity is not Porn. Porn mean a sex stuff done with an explicit will to "appeal". In My opinion, were intelligent enough to dissociate a pic which focus in the "beauty of the body" and the one which focus on base Sex. The first are great, but the second in my point of view don't belong here in actual conditions. ( and don't make me say what I didn't say, I never said porn is not art)
I really thing the mature filters should be impoved ( maybe by 2 levels, like "soft nudity" and "explicit nudity" )
But on the actual way of deviant art, I will more likely become DeviantSex than anything else...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I didn't say they were the same thing. I said most people consider them the same thing because most people don't really know what art is.
And like I said after that, it all ends up coming down to personal perception of the art in the end anyways. I don't think porn is art, and I doubt any real artist does either. Using nudity in art doesn't make it porn, but try and tell that to the people who rage about it's existence and your in for a fight.
Regardless this is a pointless argument because in the end the decision of whether it's removed from this site isn't even ours to make, it's those who run Deviantart.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yep, but as DA is a community, I think were have to expres what we think to make "those who run DA"change their point of view
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't understand people who don't read the artist's comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I did, and there was nothing that gave any hint that your stamp thing wasn't your opinion on the matter, or saying that people who disagreed with it were not allowed to comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There really wasn't. Unless what you meant in your first line was that your stamp was, in essence, a ripoff of what this skyqueen person has done, in an effort to mock him/her with something you suppose he/she might believe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wow, someone else thought this too? I was wondering why the hell those boring, run of the mill and repetitive stamps were getting on the front page.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
*snerk* funny enough, I thought Skyqueen made this until I clicked it e_e does this make me a bad person? XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Also note: I see what you did there
...and it worked. YOU MADE IT TO THE FRONTPAGE AND HOPEFULLY MADE BIIIIG PROFIT 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
the profit. Though I don't know if you made profit with it already by sitting on the frontpage and mocking us all e_e
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Holy I'm so glad you made this, I'm sick of skyqueen's shit getting on the front page with a million "o i no rite" comments. Funny thing is, seems most of the people commenting on this one think it's not satirical and probably made by skyqueen :\
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thank GOD someone else but me is thinking this. There's a fine line between art and porn or nudity.
Just having a woman or man stand there naked with some hard light isn't art.
I love you for making a stamp that made the top 8 hour mark page that protests this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
but those kind of pictures could be reference pieces.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stock photos are in a completely different section of art in my mind.
I'm referring to photos like this:
[link]
[link]
[link]
This is not art.
Reasons:
1st Pic: Sure it is an intimate moment but that doesn't make it art. It looks to me like they just took the picture with a timer on.
2nd Pic: You see pictures like this on sex cite adds on the side bar of Facebook.
3rd Pic: Really? Look in this person's gallery. The model is trying to be sexy, and art can be sexy some times but not think this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i understand your point, and i do agree with you, i was simply pointing ouy that sometimes stock photos are pictures of naked people with crappy lighting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
In a way, and not to upset the people who do do the stock photos of naked people, but that's where it belongs. I think if it's not completely the best photo you can do then you should let others use it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh me to, maybe you weren't able to make it look it's best, but maybe someone else can
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I like satire and she certainly does make a lot of stamps that all look the same, but isn't this pretty much saying the same thing as [link] ? Unless it's because I'm running entirely on caffeine and DayQuil and I'm missing the joke, I wouldn't really call it satire unless you can get some top notch snark in there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
you forgot to write something more controversial to make it the winrarest parody like 'abortion is kawaii' or something
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>