HOME | DD

Pyrexea In reply to Trapiki [2006-11-10 09:17:40 +0000 UTC]

the devil isnt evil as such. its more that the devil (lucifer) is the keeper of hell,(the same that god is the keeper of heaven) and hell is defined as the absence of god. Its only society that defines "hell" as being evil, what with the fire and brimstone and whatnot.

Personally, I'm pretty religious, in that, I do believe that there is a God, but I also subscribe to the Archangel theory of the creation of heaven, hell and earth.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Trapiki In reply to Pyrexea [2006-11-10 09:21:42 +0000 UTC]

ha ha.... wow that's some deep stuff, well the devil isn't evil, just... misguided, I think is the word, I mean the devil must have some shred of good seeming he originated from heaven...

well yeah, i dont want to have an argument and all, so i wont say much more..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrexea In reply to Trapiki [2006-11-10 09:53:46 +0000 UTC]

how can there be an arguement when we obviously agree?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Trapiki In reply to Pyrexea [2006-11-10 10:18:16 +0000 UTC]

well then we must agree if you agree as well... lol, just my friend likes to argue about religion, its a self-preservation thing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrexea In reply to Trapiki [2006-11-10 11:08:58 +0000 UTC]

arguements over religion, whilst entertaining, are a fast track to crazy town

oh and thanks for the

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Trapiki In reply to Pyrexea [2006-11-10 11:40:11 +0000 UTC]

no prob, though i dont think you should be throwing your camera around, lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrexea In reply to Trapiki [2006-11-10 11:50:38 +0000 UTC]

prolly not, but it does "throw" in an added amount of danger

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Trapiki In reply to Pyrexea [2006-11-10 12:27:00 +0000 UTC]

lol, what silly fun you have

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrexea In reply to Trapiki [2006-11-11 10:58:57 +0000 UTC]

silly fun is the best type of fun

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pyrexea In reply to aeix [2006-10-09 23:25:57 +0000 UTC]

yeah thanks dude

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pyrexea In reply to misslost [2006-10-09 05:15:14 +0000 UTC]

ahahah, creepy

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

misslost In reply to Pyrexea [2006-10-09 05:26:55 +0000 UTC]

i was just satirising a current affairs/today tonight...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrexea In reply to misslost [2006-10-09 07:24:07 +0000 UTC]

i dont watch so i would know

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

misslost In reply to Pyrexea [2006-10-09 07:33:55 +0000 UTC]

oh.. like you think i watch it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrexea In reply to misslost [2006-10-09 07:35:25 +0000 UTC]

if you satirise it you must. cause blind satire is just rather unfair. but then again tabloid tele doesnt need anything from me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

misslost In reply to Pyrexea [2006-10-09 07:38:10 +0000 UTC]

but it was funny *whinges*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrexea In reply to misslost [2006-10-09 07:38:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pyrexea In reply to SKaRTeH [2006-10-09 05:14:39 +0000 UTC]

As does mine, but, what I did is prolly really bad for the camera, (but whatever) but its called "Camera Tossing" or something. Flickr has a whole gallery dedicated to it, so yeah, thats a result from it. So yeah, was just walking down my hallway pressing the shutter and throwing. Its great

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SKaRTeH In reply to Pyrexea [2006-10-09 07:18:35 +0000 UTC]

You actually throw it :s ouch! I wouldnt be doin that with a new camera Ive often wondered if shooting into the sun on a digital is unhealthy for it :/ i mean its not healthy for eyes and cameras work similarly...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrexea In reply to SKaRTeH [2006-10-09 07:20:36 +0000 UTC]

yeah you can burn the sensor doing that

but the camera was attached to me at all times

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pyrexea In reply to javsthemute [2006-10-09 05:14:51 +0000 UTC]

Was kinda the look i was going for, thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pyrexea In reply to postaldude66 [2006-10-08 12:59:14 +0000 UTC]

it was the look i was going for, thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0