HOME | DD

Pyrosity In reply to Battle360 [2011-11-03 01:58:47 +0000 UTC]

Well thank you kindly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pyrosity In reply to Fringecrow [2011-05-31 02:52:30 +0000 UTC]

Yessss. :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fringecrow In reply to Pyrosity [2011-05-31 04:18:26 +0000 UTC]

The Is-3 is the endtank for the Soviets in Men of War :3

(then US has the T-29, brits have the Tortoise, Germany evidently has the King Tiger(the one reason everybody's prototypes are made playable in this game) and Japan have.... I guess the Chi-ri and Ho-Ri 2... respectively Tiger I and Elephant lookalikes. Also, I still don't understand what sense Japanese tank design machine gun placement was supposed to make! Who the hell puts a MG, in the turret of one of the largest tank of a nation.... only on the -right- side of the turret, with no AA or coaxial MG?)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrosity In reply to Fringecrow [2011-06-14 18:07:12 +0000 UTC]

Oh damn, the US get a T-29? How did I miss that the first time I read the comment XD

I love that damn thing. I don't care how "silly" it looks with the boxes on the turret, they make it look like a goddamn mammoth tank from C&C. Not to mention the 105mm gun is stupid-effective in it's WoT portrayal :3

And yeah, after playing a bit of MoW, I see what you mean about Japanese tanks. They are ... quite bizarre.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fringecrow In reply to Pyrosity [2011-06-14 18:57:19 +0000 UTC]

Yup. Also another scary thing of the T-29?

The dual-.50 cal coaxial guns. That makes for -scary- infantry mowing platform.

Only thing almost worst for the Infantry to tackle is the IS-2 with hull MG, coaxial MG, rear turret MG -and- heavy AA MG. That thing is a literal hedgehog able to spew death from almost all sides when properly positionned, especially since field of vision triangles are associated to -all- of it's attached weaponry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyrosity In reply to Fringecrow [2011-06-14 19:03:17 +0000 UTC]

Hah! I thought that's what those were. Goddamn, what a beast of a tank. Both of em, really.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0