HOME | DD

Published: 2018-11-11 17:29:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 5944; Favourites: 148; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 8
Tello640 [2020-07-26 16:56:16 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nuclearzeon2 [2018-12-23 23:51:30 +0000 UTC]
This is a cool chart. But a few things:
1: I noticed you didn't include the zebu. Is that due to them being descended from a subspecies of aurochs (which cows already are descended from)?
2: Even though they're extinct, it would've been cool to see the culpeo on here.
3: There's some bird species you didn't include, like guineafowl, Barbary doves, canaries, finches, and Muscovy ducks.
4: Even though you probably have reasons why you didn't, it would've been cool to see domestic fish and insects like goldfish, koi, and honey bees.
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
AtomiKreeper In reply to Nuclearzeon2 [2019-01-12 15:39:18 +0000 UTC]
The Culpeo isn't extinct.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nuclearzeon2 In reply to AtomiKreeper [2019-01-13 04:45:31 +0000 UTC]
The domestic Culpeo is.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Rainbowleo In reply to Nuclearzeon2 [2019-01-06 00:46:37 +0000 UTC]
I didn't wanted to do twice the same animals, that why there is no zebu (which is by the way potentially part of Bos taurus), muscovy duck and barbary dove. Some animals like ornemental birds, fish or elephants are hard to defined as domestic because the frontier between domestic animals and tamed animals is very blured. That's a choice I made.
For insect like bees and silkworms, I didn't draw them for practical reason because they are too small and it would be hard to see them.
For culpeo, there is some evidences of relatioship with humans, but it doesn't precise that they were trully domesticated.
Voilà, other questions ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nuclearzeon2 In reply to Rainbowleo [2019-01-06 00:49:10 +0000 UTC]
My only other question is why you chose to reply so late.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheWatcherofWorlds [2018-11-11 18:22:49 +0000 UTC]
Can't read french but this is really cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 0