HOME | DD

RandomAV1 — Synthetic Nature

Published: 2004-08-25 04:34:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 161; Favourites: 1; Downloads: 22
Redirect to original
Description Just so you all know there are no manipulations to this picture, I reapeat NO manipulations. I do not know why it turned out like this but ohh well it's kind of cool. This is the actual color of the photo.
Related content
Comments: 16

quixote-stock [2004-08-31 03:10:19 +0000 UTC]

i'll bet you left the shutter open for a short time because it was so bright.... sometimes photos that go into the sun turn out that way... it really looks cool though - it feels nastalgic and like a storm is on the air... good shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RandomAV1 In reply to quixote-stock [2004-08-31 03:36:21 +0000 UTC]

Had the camera set on auto, so not sure what the shutter speed was at. Thanks for the comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Laughalotcrazy [2004-08-29 21:02:35 +0000 UTC]

That's pretty awesome. I would've definitely assumed it was grayscaled, but if you look closely you can see some brief yellowish tint/whitish tint that would've been dampened by grayscale.

Awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

karyaazure [2004-08-26 19:10:09 +0000 UTC]

That's really beautiful... I almost* like it more than the lastest sunset pics

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sisandbro [2004-08-26 04:18:33 +0000 UTC]

awesome!!! i love it!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RandomAV1 In reply to sisandbro [2004-08-26 06:05:21 +0000 UTC]

s Opps I mean Thanks They kinda sound the same

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sisandbro In reply to RandomAV1 [2004-08-26 21:50:25 +0000 UTC]

ROFL.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RandomAV1 [2004-08-26 02:23:22 +0000 UTC]

This picture is really strange to me. Everytime I look it gets stranger. I just noticed that it looks flat, there is no texture or anything, very strange, and kinda creepy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WanderingElf [2004-08-25 23:47:40 +0000 UTC]

Wow, great shot. I would have assumed that you'd greyscaled this if you hadn't said about no manipulations. It's just so... monochromatic and moody. It's only really on full view, that the deep blue tones in the top clouds come through. I love the sharp silhouette of the tree against the softer clouds, especially with it being off centre.

Have question though - if you take these on a digital camera, how come the 'file info' doesn't show in the information?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RandomAV1 In reply to WanderingElf [2004-08-26 00:45:54 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm, it used to. I think it doesn't cause I use a program called Neat Image to take the noise out of my pictures, and when it resaves it I loose that info. Which is wierd cause when I go to properties it's in there, hmmmm.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WanderingElf In reply to RandomAV1 [2004-08-26 00:49:26 +0000 UTC]

Think it might just be this one, I looked at the other one you subbed recently and it was on there. Maybe it flubbed up or something

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

theoman [2004-08-25 19:38:22 +0000 UTC]

very cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Yaeka [2004-08-25 16:50:26 +0000 UTC]

awsome, fav for u! another one that is...... >.>;;; XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RandomAV1 [2004-08-25 05:46:15 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

burningrose [2004-08-25 04:41:10 +0000 UTC]

Wild! The silhouette of the palm tree is incredibly eerie. Great shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

inneed-of-restraint [2004-08-25 04:39:32 +0000 UTC]

very very pretty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0