HOME | DD

randomdinos — Styxosaurus sp. schematic.

#elasmosaurus #plesiosaur #elasmosauridae #styxosaurus #plesiosauroidea #hydralmosaurus
Published: 2018-04-02 16:36:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 12207; Favourites: 137; Downloads: 148
Redirect to original
Description A marine reptile? In my deviantART? It's more likely than you think. One of multiple long-necked plesiosaurs from the Western Interior Seaway, as well as one of the largest elasmosaurs, Styxosaurus is often overshadowed by its close relative and group namer Elasmosaurus although the latter is smaller, and it's probably not surprising that I have very little to say about it, especially with how unfamiliar I am with marine reptiles in general ( would've managed a few more paragraphs, at least). Another former specimen of Hydralmosaurus (AMNH 5835, now S.brownii) was likely larger than AMNH 1495, surpassing 11 m, but less complete.

References:
-Williston S. W. (1890a). "Structure of the Plesiosaurian Skull". Science. 16 (405): 262. doi :10.1126/science.ns-16.405.262JSTOR  1766513 .
-Williston S. W. (1890b). "A New Plesiosaur from the Niobrara Cretaceous of Kansas" . Transactions of the Annual Meetings of the Kansas Academy of Science. 12: 174–178. doi :10.2307/3623798 .
-Welles, S. P. and Bump, J. 1949. Alzadasaurus pembertoni, a new elasmosaur from the Upper Cretaceous of South Dakota. Journal of Paleontology 23(5): 521-535.
-Otero RA. (2016) Taxonomic reassessment of Hydralmosaurus as Styxosaurus: new insights on the elasmosaurid neck evolution throughout the Cretaceous. PeerJ 4:e1777 doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1777

Human silhouette from www.onlygfx.com/20-woman-silho…
Related content
Comments: 27

Shaochilong66 [2018-04-03 15:05:47 +0000 UTC]

more 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yutyrannus In reply to Shaochilong66 [2018-04-04 00:14:19 +0000 UTC]

More

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shaochilong66 In reply to Yutyrannus [2018-04-07 01:00:07 +0000 UTC]

MORE

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yutyrannus In reply to Shaochilong66 [2018-04-07 04:08:16 +0000 UTC]

M O R E

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shaochilong66 In reply to Yutyrannus [2018-04-08 00:40:34 +0000 UTC]

M O A R 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mesozoic0906 [2018-04-03 02:23:45 +0000 UTC]

Can you do Aristonectes, given that osteology paper has published in 2018

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

randomdinos In reply to Mesozoic0906 [2018-04-04 20:09:01 +0000 UTC]

Not much lateral views there to go on, I'm afraid. And it already has a dorsal view schematic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mesozoic0906 In reply to randomdinos [2018-04-05 08:10:05 +0000 UTC]

Do you think size estimate in the paper is good enough?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mesozoic0906 In reply to Mesozoic0906 [2018-04-03 02:24:22 +0000 UTC]

www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dinosaurlover83 [2018-04-02 20:23:38 +0000 UTC]

D O W N S I Z E
And less complete than I thought (thought we had a skull of this guy, RIP)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PCAwesomeness In reply to Dinosaurlover83 [2018-04-02 23:43:05 +0000 UTC]

You should actually use "U p s i s Z e" to describe this scaling; the specimen Randomdinos scaled (AMNH 1495) was said to be relatively small in another chart .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinosaurlover83 In reply to PCAwesomeness [2018-04-03 00:16:29 +0000 UTC]

oh... must've been thinking of another species :^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yutyrannus In reply to Dinosaurlover83 [2018-04-03 07:07:40 +0000 UTC]

You're probably thinking of S. browni; that's the giant one

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinosaurlover83 In reply to Yutyrannus [2018-04-03 07:18:37 +0000 UTC]

yup, that's what I was probably thinking of

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PCAwesomeness [2018-04-02 20:22:14 +0000 UTC]

"Who are you?"
"I'm you but longer"

- This Styxosaurus to Spino's Styxosaurus

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Carnoferox [2018-04-02 16:58:59 +0000 UTC]

You should do SDSM 451 (Styxosaurus snowii, formerly the holotype of Alzadasaurus pembertoni) next, as it's known from relatively complete material.

PDF No Preview

  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AlternatePrehistory [2018-04-02 16:42:15 +0000 UTC]

Uh, wrong. Deletethis please

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

PeteriDish In reply to AlternatePrehistory [2018-04-02 19:17:16 +0000 UTC]

rude much?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlternatePrehistory In reply to PeteriDish [2018-04-02 19:27:52 +0000 UTC]

no, randomdinos has systematically downise every animl... he hates big animal

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PeteriDish In reply to AlternatePrehistory [2018-04-02 20:37:20 +0000 UTC]

Nothing wrong with conservative estimates though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlternatePrehistory In reply to PeteriDish [2018-04-02 20:59:14 +0000 UTC]

evreythin is wrong because he hayte big deino

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PeteriDish In reply to AlternatePrehistory [2018-04-04 19:33:43 +0000 UTC]

Whatever m8.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jdailey1991 In reply to AlternatePrehistory [2018-04-02 17:47:43 +0000 UTC]

Care to clarify?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlternatePrehistory In reply to Jdailey1991 [2018-04-02 19:27:27 +0000 UTC]

he wrog and he did not use cetacean tails as bas

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jdailey1991 In reply to AlternatePrehistory [2018-04-02 22:06:40 +0000 UTC]

Care to clarify?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlternatePrehistory In reply to Jdailey1991 [2018-04-03 14:36:54 +0000 UTC]

ok honestly you do know I'm being sarcastic right? I've Favourited this piece, and worked with him on some of his pieces. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

randomdinos In reply to AlternatePrehistory [2018-04-02 16:47:05 +0000 UTC]

Hm i see

👍: 0 ⏩: 0