HOME | DD

Ravajava In reply to tamtamgod [2012-11-01 00:54:27 +0000 UTC]

Lol yeah, that's true Guess it's a popular French name

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tamtamgod In reply to Ravajava [2012-11-02 02:19:34 +0000 UTC]

Maybe just popular amongst sci-fi writers?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to tamtamgod [2012-11-02 02:20:29 +0000 UTC]

Lole French, I meant Russian

"He can speak Russian, In french."

Perhaps that's it. Has a nice ring to it to

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tamtamgod In reply to Ravajava [2012-11-02 02:38:58 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I was wondering about that lolol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to tamtamgod [2012-11-02 02:43:36 +0000 UTC]

French, Russian, same thing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tamtamgod In reply to Ravajava [2012-11-03 22:26:35 +0000 UTC]

...uh-huh keep telling yourself that lololol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-29 12:28:34 +0000 UTC]

It's a near future sci-fi set in the real world a few years after WW3 ended. Skips around North America quite a bit, but that's basically where it stays.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-30 00:33:22 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm.. I see. Sounds cool. Are they super overpowered experiments that have escaped and are out to get the ones responsible for their situation are are they mercenaries in a post ww3 North America?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-30 00:51:40 +0000 UTC]

Well, it depends between different characters. Colette for example is quite okay with the people who did the experiments to her, sorta of a mix of Stockholm Syndrome and other health problems that were corrected by the experiments, where as Chris Dunn can't wait to kill every person involved.

Of course, they were all treated differently as well. Katya for example was just released, set free, because she wasn't aggressive enough and she knew the difference between right and wrong. She's quite happy trying to live normally. Where as Samantha still works for the organization and wants to kill off everyone who left.

There were hundreds of them, so they all went in different directions, and there isn't a unified group of them, is what I'm getting at I guess The main characters work for the US government, trying to stop the organization (Tri-Tower) from doing whatever it is they are planning and the bad guys are the experiments (hybrids) still working for Tri-Tower. But that organization only has three of that hundreds (albeit, one of them is undeniably the most powerful), where as Tri-Tower still has around a hundred left (albeit, only three of them are actually that powerful, the rest could probably be beaten by the police or military). The rest either died in the war, ended up getting gunned down by police after going on murderous rampages, or settled into a normal life somewhere.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-31 02:23:32 +0000 UTC]

woah, cool. That's good. I hope your characters grow into awesome people.

So its mostly set in the war torn US of A and no other countries and such?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-10-31 02:44:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks I hope so to.

Well, it's a mix bag. Places like New Orleans, Atlantic City and much of Florida are essentially flooded ruins with maybe a hundred people or less still hanging around for various reasons. Much of the midwest is desert, brought on by climate change and west coast cities like San Francisco and Seattle were struck badly by Chinese subs, as was Vancouver in Canada, but by Acadia they are mostly rebuilt. On the other hand, cities like Washington D.C., Philadelphia and Detroit are beautiful metropolis's with millions of people, and the war never effected them. WW3 didn't hit the US or Canada as bad as it did much of East Asia.

Canada is also there of course, Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa and Uranium city appear. Mexico has one bit as well.

The Universe Acadia takes place in is more global, but Acadia in particular is quite North America focused.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-11-10 02:16:47 +0000 UTC]

Sounds like they'll be in one heck of an adventure

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-11-10 02:19:28 +0000 UTC]

I'd like to think so.

Have to re-write the introduction again, which sucks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jailgurdnegative In reply to Ravajava [2012-11-10 23:05:35 +0000 UTC]

Still it would be worth the effort.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-11-10 23:07:55 +0000 UTC]

I'll make sure of it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ravajava In reply to blackrain8 [2012-10-28 06:16:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

Yeah, slept on it and got some reference photo's, went back to basics, would say I went back to the drawing board essentially, but I did draw this on a drawing board

Of course, I look a it now, and I'm already seeing mistakes again

Ah well, always next time

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

blackrain8 In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-28 08:47:30 +0000 UTC]

All good, looks great...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to blackrain8 [2012-10-28 14:56:21 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ravajava In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-10-27 23:19:30 +0000 UTC]

Assuming that's a good thing...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NDTwoFives In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-27 23:21:28 +0000 UTC]

Hehe yeah.

Makes you standing out amongst those who keep their linearts obvious

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-10-27 23:29:57 +0000 UTC]

Well that's good

Yeah, I do that because I find it easier, faster and less frustrating. I don't know what happens when you use Gimp, but there were almost 20 layers in this Do the base colouring of one of the girls in 2 or 3 minutes with giant inaccurate blobs of colour, and then just come back with an eraser. Sorta like charcoal now that I think about it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NDTwoFives In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-28 00:26:47 +0000 UTC]

I used to do that some time ago, I erased more than coloring.
When you'll get a tablet and learn about dynamic lines, everything's gonna change XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ravajava In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-10-28 00:46:22 +0000 UTC]

We shall see

Does seem enticing though, may be more accurate.

Who knows though, I may get good at this style and stick with it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ravajava In reply to WOsmitty [2012-10-27 23:12:28 +0000 UTC]

Zanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WOsmitty In reply to Ravajava [2012-10-27 23:21:35 +0000 UTC]

Welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ravajava In reply to theGman0 [2012-10-27 22:50:17 +0000 UTC]

Yes, good to see you aren't colour blind

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0