HOME | DD

RitterRunkel In reply to 2brokenhearts [2010-08-24 11:47:44 +0000 UTC]

I like it too. Though wood impressions are often not spectacular - to people not loving wood. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

2brokenhearts In reply to RitterRunkel [2010-08-24 15:42:53 +0000 UTC]

People not many knows how to appreciate mother nature, and that so sad. I appreciate, and love from the smallest little thing in earth to the gigantic trees.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RitterRunkel In reply to rubyxruby [2010-03-24 23:35:34 +0000 UTC]

Should? Who said I did not?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RitterRunkel In reply to rubyxruby [2010-01-10 21:33:00 +0000 UTC]

I agree. I love such details of nature, though this is not spectacular enough for most people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RitterRunkel In reply to NellyOnly [2008-01-26 17:50:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NellyOnly In reply to RitterRunkel [2008-01-26 19:08:58 +0000 UTC]

yay!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RitterRunkel In reply to Genoveva612 [2008-01-26 10:03:23 +0000 UTC]

Haha, jaaa. Schön daß Du es magst und was sehen möchtest! Das ist auch schon ein altes und kein Überflieger. Aber ich komm gerade kaum mehr zum Fotografieren. Und dieses Photo mußte nu dazu, weil es einer Dame gefällt, die mich gerade ziemlich glücklich macht. Damit seh ich das Bild selbst auch gern und dann gehört es eben hier zu den mir lieben Bildern.

Hoff, es geht Dir auch so gut!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Genoveva612 In reply to RitterRunkel [2008-01-27 14:22:50 +0000 UTC]

hab ich schon gewundert, was du so lange treibst, ohne neue devs. aber jetzt ist ja alles klar - du hast was besseres zu tun *grins*

naja, um ehrlich zu sein geht es mir nicht ganz so gut, bin total erkältet und in der Liebe klappt auch nichts, wie es soll

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RitterRunkel In reply to AprilElizabeth [2008-01-26 09:56:35 +0000 UTC]

They bent forward a little bit to look after us. But maybe my lens has helped to let them look like this, too ^^

Thank you, April!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RitterRunkel In reply to vekat [2008-01-26 09:49:40 +0000 UTC]

thx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RitterRunkel In reply to StMongo [2008-01-26 00:00:24 +0000 UTC]

yes! ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RitterRunkel In reply to pavel89l [2008-01-25 23:59:18 +0000 UTC]

Thx
It's one photo, super wide angle (15 mm diagonal fish)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pavel89l In reply to RitterRunkel [2008-01-25 23:59:52 +0000 UTC]

is it canon

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RitterRunkel In reply to pavel89l [2008-01-26 00:02:21 +0000 UTC]

the cam is a canon (5D), the lens is a sigma (15/2.8 EX)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pavel89l In reply to RitterRunkel [2008-01-26 00:03:40 +0000 UTC]

how is the quality, is it better that canon lenses in reality? Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RitterRunkel In reply to pavel89l [2008-01-26 00:10:26 +0000 UTC]

Don't think that quality is higher, but it's quite satisfying to me. I would have chosen the canon, but it claims 5 cm more distance to its closest focus than the sigma. So I decided to buy the sigma, because I like fisheyes especially with such close-up view.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pavel89l In reply to RitterRunkel [2008-01-26 00:13:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your helpful responses

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RitterRunkel In reply to pavel89l [2008-01-26 00:16:34 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pavel89l In reply to RitterRunkel [2008-01-26 00:17:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0