HOME | DD

rjcarroll — Untitled

Published: 2004-08-07 21:30:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 1188; Favourites: 28; Downloads: 136
Redirect to original
Description All of these mannequins were in the basement all of the way in the front of this huge store I worked in, furthest away from the employees that worked in the shipping and receiving department. No windows. Little light...
If anyone saw me taking the pictures that yeilded this work they would have freaked. Not your artistic types working there, that's for sure. They never would have understood. Every female non-artist that sees this piece automatically thinks that it is of sexual nature (I guess because these mannequins are unclothed?) which, was not my intent when I shot it. Kinda makes ya wonder where some folks mind's are at...
Related content
Comments: 66

rjcarroll In reply to ??? [2006-10-29 17:38:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Yeah it does!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

misseddiepaige [2006-04-29 01:16:39 +0000 UTC]

lovely, the grain makes it just right

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to misseddiepaige [2006-04-29 02:57:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! The grain is all natural from Tri-X film! Remember that stuff?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chow-Chowa [2006-01-15 20:32:51 +0000 UTC]

wow this is so cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to Chow-Chowa [2006-01-15 23:20:33 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Darling!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KoontzPhotography [2005-09-09 04:09:21 +0000 UTC]

I'm thinking more along the lines of .... "what are they talking about?"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to KoontzPhotography [2005-09-09 20:32:26 +0000 UTC]

Probably what they are going to wear later on!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KoontzPhotography In reply to rjcarroll [2005-09-09 20:51:55 +0000 UTC]

hahaha. Or "why are we naked?"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to KoontzPhotography [2005-09-09 21:12:35 +0000 UTC]

Haha! "What the hell happened to our hair!!!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KoontzPhotography In reply to rjcarroll [2005-09-09 21:45:18 +0000 UTC]

HAhah. I think that tops it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to KoontzPhotography [2005-09-09 21:56:02 +0000 UTC]

Maybe I should have a caption contest!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KoontzPhotography In reply to rjcarroll [2005-09-09 22:03:31 +0000 UTC]

That would be HILLARIOUS! you should!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

-marysia- [2005-09-08 11:43:08 +0000 UTC]

this is creepy yet fun!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to -marysia- [2005-09-08 21:55:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Hun!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

krystletwystd [2005-08-26 19:51:43 +0000 UTC]

*lol* That's funny. I read it more as a commentary on social standards or something more along those lines...that always bothers me though - why are boobies and nakedness so taboo? I mean, crists, people, they're body parts. Lots of people have them.
On the other hand, watching violence on TV is the norm.

Go figure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to krystletwystd [2005-08-27 01:14:45 +0000 UTC]

I hear ya! I could go on forever with that argument!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

krystletwystd In reply to rjcarroll [2005-08-30 14:55:30 +0000 UTC]

indeed. Yeah, I had this whole 2 hour long conversation with this European artist named "Ten" at my friend's New Year's Party. Apparently the ratings for most movies and such there is the opposite of what it is here with violence being much more taboo than sex...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to krystletwystd [2005-08-30 19:29:23 +0000 UTC]

Kinda messed up dontcha think?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

krystletwystd In reply to rjcarroll [2005-09-06 20:27:39 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, well...that's people for you...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to krystletwystd [2005-09-07 21:10:54 +0000 UTC]

You know it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

oretunidog [2005-08-26 01:20:54 +0000 UTC]

you know what tops it all off? the grain of the film. That's what makes it seem like a horror piece to the guys and a sexual piece to the women. It reads like a file photo. personally, it reminds me of a crime scene. It's great how most of them are looking to their right. nice work though, i like the gallery, actually.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to oretunidog [2005-08-26 13:31:45 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your great comment! Basically what it all comes down to is, women are bigger pervs!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pumpkin-party [2005-05-31 17:38:34 +0000 UTC]

amazing.. i would never see a sexual side to it but a scary one is there for sure. its just how they have been abandonedand left there and this is how you found them which makes it really just top notch and klassy. you have some klassy pieces in your gallery but i liked this one the most but can't wait for the 1966 Thunderchicken so from me its and fave AND a watch

lucky boy....

^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to pumpkin-party [2005-06-01 02:49:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the fav and teh watch! As I have said before, this pic has been highly controversial. Most of the women think it represents perversion due to the lack of clothing. Usually, when I hear negative connotations I find that it is a projection of one's thoughts/deeds onto another person! Most guys usually go with the horror movie interpretation. Now, with that being said, which gender possesses the perverted mind...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Popgrafix [2005-05-24 07:41:48 +0000 UTC]

I love this picture. I understand the ethical conflict that surrounds this kind of work. Of course it's the male side part of us humans that make women have a natural fear for this type of female portraits, and I'm sorry to say that they have every reason to. Most men are uncivilised animals when it comes to some biological urges. I got the same problem with my more explicit erotic illustrations. I just want to portray all of women's beauty without all the sexual conflict it arouses. Still men don't appreciate it for the right reasons, and women are repelled by it because of that.
With this picture it's even more unsettling that the women are just real lifeless objects and still release the same human instincts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to Popgrafix [2005-05-24 19:29:00 +0000 UTC]

One of the ideas behind this piece was that there is really nothing dating it. It could have been taken anytime in the last 30 years. The other point is, the front most mannequin with its head to the right is out of the depth of field and appears have to been caught in motion (more prominant in looking at the original photo). I wanted to add a surrealistic aspect of movement to a group of inanimate objects. Not much of a titillating piece, unless of course, you happen to be Howdy Doody or Pinocchio...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Popgrafix In reply to rjcarroll [2005-05-24 20:22:30 +0000 UTC]

Fortunately people at DA can look at work like this with another view than other people might. There's a lot of folks out there with a really uptight and narrow view on everything remotely reminiscent of sex. I like your ideas behind it though and I enjoyed the picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to Popgrafix [2005-05-25 18:38:53 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comments! I look forward to seeing your work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nagymarci [2005-05-24 04:53:15 +0000 UTC]

this dummy community pic reminds me on some wwII deathcamp shots...
VERY diturbing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to Nagymarci [2005-05-24 16:56:07 +0000 UTC]

Never looked at it like that, but now that you mention it...I like that take on it! Thanks for the comment my friend!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DarkIsabella [2004-12-11 20:30:26 +0000 UTC]

oh this pic is cool..it reminds me of the opening credits of the show nip tuck

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to DarkIsabella [2004-12-11 21:38:26 +0000 UTC]

Haven't heard of nip tuck...This always reminded me of The Twilight Zone! Thanks for looking at my work! You have a nice gallery and you're such a cutie too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkIsabella In reply to rjcarroll [2004-12-11 21:53:47 +0000 UTC]

thank you

you have awsome work in your gallery

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to DarkIsabella [2004-12-11 23:30:07 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome and thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

demonica621 [2004-11-13 01:11:00 +0000 UTC]

gotta love those manacans...woo hoo lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to demonica621 [2004-11-13 01:11:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Seems to be a fav among many!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

demonica621 In reply to rjcarroll [2004-11-13 01:13:26 +0000 UTC]

That's always a good thing..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to demonica621 [2004-11-13 01:17:40 +0000 UTC]

Sure is! Always nice to get a reaction!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

demonica621 In reply to rjcarroll [2004-11-13 01:19:55 +0000 UTC]

yea it is...when you don't get one it kinda gets to ya..sucks really

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to demonica621 [2004-11-13 01:22:50 +0000 UTC]

I hear ya! Seems like what I think is my best gets nothing and what I am reluctant to post b/c I don't think is up to par gets the most reaction, go figure!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

demonica621 In reply to rjcarroll [2004-11-16 18:22:51 +0000 UTC]

lol yea i know..sometimes i just put something up that i find ok or i hate it and everyone else loves it...so confusing..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to demonica621 [2004-11-16 18:54:06 +0000 UTC]

Tough being an artist, isn't it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

demonica621 In reply to rjcarroll [2004-11-17 21:17:50 +0000 UTC]

yea but i love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to demonica621 [2004-11-17 22:21:56 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, me too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

demonica621 In reply to rjcarroll [2004-11-26 04:08:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dollee [2004-10-25 20:20:45 +0000 UTC]

Kinda makes you think... without all our fancy clothes and belongings, we all are the same, aren't we? It's our belongings that people use to differentiate themselves from eachother. I like this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to dollee [2004-10-26 02:10:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Great point of view! It's so wonderful to hear of all of the interpretations that this piece generates! Thanks hun!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

crushedovernight [2004-10-16 23:04:03 +0000 UTC]

interesting piece. it would have been really cool to have a real girl in there too, perhaps with the same blank expression..!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rjcarroll In reply to crushedovernight [2004-10-17 01:11:42 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, that would have been cool! Thanks for the comments!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pushytta [2004-10-09 18:24:37 +0000 UTC]

This is really cool! Have one like this in my gallery too...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>