HOME | DD

RobCaswell β€” Columbia Inbound

Published: 2012-08-25 19:07:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 9004; Favourites: 157; Downloads: 483
Redirect to original
Description A Trek piece done using my new stock background [link] . Also using Greywolf-Starkiller's DEG-inspired Scout model and David Metlesits' G-Type starbase model.

DAz Studio render.
Related content
Comments: 55

DEWLine-Ottawa In reply to ??? [2023-08-19 22:32:51 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NO-SoupForYou In reply to DEWLine-Ottawa [2023-08-20 00:15:40 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RobCaswell In reply to ??? [2014-09-29 20:22:30 +0000 UTC]

In the original Connies there isn't all that much unique engineering in the Engineering Hull, so it's pretty easy to imagine that they could make an independent saucer ship like this. As for the nav deflector, that technical rationale was a late arrival. When this ship was designed, that dish was understood to be the "Main Sensor". The nav deflector array was, I recall, the three white dots that appeared on the front of the primary hull. It was either something in later movies or TNG that reassigned this device's function.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

templerman In reply to RobCaswell [2020-11-23 18:25:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NO-SoupForYou In reply to RobCaswell [2014-10-01 14:43:43 +0000 UTC]

ButΒ the dish-as-deflectorΒ was then thoroughly retconned in... book authors and.Starship Creator saw to that.Β  And even accounting for TOS's odd M/ARA configuration, a warp core and fuel storage is bulky for the saucer to contain.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to NO-SoupForYou [2014-10-01 16:53:27 +0000 UTC]

The warp core was a TNG creation. Have you ever looked through the original, 70's Ballantine Enterprise blueprints? It wasn't until the Motion Picture Enterprise (several years after the design of the Scout/Destroyer) where we started to see power train integration between the two hulls.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NO-SoupForYou In reply to RobCaswell [2014-10-08 22:32:25 +0000 UTC]

The Classic warp reactor may not have been a 'core' in form, but it is a M/ARA power plant regardless.Β  Those still require plasma conduits, support machinery and fuel storage that would be difficult to fit into a Constitution-class primary hull.Β  I suspect that's the reason Miranda-class hulls are bulked up towards the stern.

Incidently, I did once see those plans when in middle school.Β  Even then,Β I gotΒ the sad impression that the writers were in way over their heads andΒ just trying to bluff their way out.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

crudedoodle [2014-03-09 13:30:19 +0000 UTC]

Your artwork, especially your Star Trek work, is beautiful. I've been seeing it on Tumblr and it's simply breathtaking.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Colourbrand [2013-04-17 18:51:02 +0000 UTC]

Dammit - always making masterpieces of the beauty of space and the joy of exploration combined with the humility the cosmos bestows on man.

Excellent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Colourbrand [2013-04-19 19:44:38 +0000 UTC]

Well... thanks for clearly seeing the passion/spirit behind these pieces. Sure, playing chicken with Klingon D-7s was always kinda cool - especially in my younger days. But the REAL appeal for me has always been Trek (and all sci-fi's) exploration of the unknown... and the challenges that come with that experience. I suspect you know EXACTLY what I mean

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Colourbrand In reply to RobCaswell [2013-04-20 11:56:20 +0000 UTC]

Was not for me at first but as one gets older...I wish...who knows, one day someone may do a story about that - there is more awe in the cosmos than blasting Klingons...

Well said sir

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

superpic [2013-03-28 09:38:40 +0000 UTC]

It's the bloody unicycle of starships! O.o
...
She is rather pretty though, in a peculier sorta way.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to superpic [2013-03-28 18:38:37 +0000 UTC]

LOL!
"Unicycle"... perfect!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Steve629 [2013-02-01 17:52:07 +0000 UTC]

Wow, that's great! I have a similar AMT 18" model in progress. Mine is the U.S.S Sacagawea NCC-1788. I think I've just struck "Trek Gold", here!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Steve629 [2013-02-07 19:53:50 +0000 UTC]

HA! Glad you're groovin' on my gallery, Steve! If it weren't such an expensive kit, it'd totally rock to see a Scout made from the new, 1/350th Polar Lights kits!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DrOfDemonology [2012-12-09 00:29:06 +0000 UTC]

Yet again, more awesomeness. Classic ship, classic station, and it don't get much better than gas giants when it comes to stellar eye candy. Damn fine job, good sir

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to DrOfDemonology [2012-12-19 01:59:53 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. It's just the view I wish I could see out my window

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DrOfDemonology In reply to RobCaswell [2012-12-19 02:01:39 +0000 UTC]

Ditto

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Farwanderer [2012-09-05 18:12:25 +0000 UTC]

I cannot get enough of these classic FJ style ships. Always beautiful work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Farwanderer [2012-09-10 14:28:54 +0000 UTC]

Well... as I may have said before, TOS (and FJ) are my favorite Trek era.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LmAnt [2012-08-28 06:22:35 +0000 UTC]

A Trek-Starship without nacelles (or with just one?) looks a bit strange to me, because everytime I see an "UFO"-Section I expect an "Enterprise" hanging on it (silly me)
Though still the composition of colours and how everything is arranged here is still working better than normal
And it's a Lovely background too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to LmAnt [2012-08-28 16:57:24 +0000 UTC]

Sorry to inflict nacelle confusion on you , but I'm pleased you find it visually happy-making

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpiderTrekfan616 [2012-08-27 00:24:21 +0000 UTC]

This Starship was briefly Referenced in Star Trek The Motion Picture, during the first scene featuring the Communicatons station Epsilon XI.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to SpiderTrekfan616 [2012-08-27 15:11:17 +0000 UTC]

Yep! It was a great nod to Franz Josef's effort

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dibujantte [2012-08-26 19:29:03 +0000 UTC]

Great Job! Thanks so much for sharing. Joy!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Dibujantte [2012-08-27 15:10:38 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vatorx [2012-08-26 18:56:07 +0000 UTC]

I was wondering, are you using IBL like Uberenvironment for these ? or just regular DS lights ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to vatorx [2012-08-26 19:04:56 +0000 UTC]

Just the standard lights. Nothing fancy at all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

vatorx In reply to RobCaswell [2012-08-26 19:15:17 +0000 UTC]

It looks better this way, I usually go crazy trying to get a mix between IBL and regular lights, and comes out weird

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jim197 [2012-08-26 17:35:05 +0000 UTC]

Oooooh, lovely picture

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Jim197 [2012-08-27 15:10:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Thomas-Peters [2012-08-26 14:17:24 +0000 UTC]

Gorgeous color balancing act! You really draw the eye to all the right focus point. You've managed to give a real feeling of vista and wonder in what is ostensibly an average, slice-of-life scene.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Thomas-Peters [2012-08-27 15:10:13 +0000 UTC]

Well... "average" in the 22nd century is almost certainly "jaw dropping" for us cave dwellers!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MysticMachine [2012-08-26 06:58:55 +0000 UTC]

Love retro ST renderings. Great work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to MysticMachine [2012-08-27 15:09:11 +0000 UTC]

TOS is my favorite playground

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AbaKon [2012-08-26 03:20:04 +0000 UTC]

I think we owe GS a dinner...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to AbaKon [2012-08-27 15:08:52 +0000 UTC]

AND a foot massage!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Zhaanman [2012-08-26 03:11:03 +0000 UTC]

Sweet love the point Of view a real creative Beauty!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Zhaanman [2012-08-27 15:08:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, bud

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zhaanman In reply to RobCaswell [2012-08-27 18:42:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ThierryCravatte [2012-08-26 01:26:57 +0000 UTC]

Whoaw, impressive scene !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to ThierryCravatte [2012-08-26 01:52:52 +0000 UTC]

Glad ya dig it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

selene-chekov [2012-08-26 01:20:56 +0000 UTC]

sweet, (where did the naccles go?)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to selene-chekov [2012-08-26 01:52:28 +0000 UTC]

The Scout's only got one.... poor lil' ship

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vvvan [2012-08-25 23:37:23 +0000 UTC]

Magnificant!

I made this suggestion a looong time ago, but here it is again. How 'bout a 24th Century scout ship? Kit-bash a Voyager-type saucer with a single warp nacelle. Easy-peasy as the Kilingons say... after enough blood wine.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to vvvan [2012-08-26 01:52:03 +0000 UTC]

Hm. It's gonna take a LOT of blood wine...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

vvvan In reply to RobCaswell [2012-08-26 02:59:09 +0000 UTC]

Quch chech!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MetalSnail [2012-08-25 21:29:56 +0000 UTC]

Nice!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to MetalSnail [2012-08-26 01:51:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, MS!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vorphil [2012-08-25 21:25:29 +0000 UTC]

wow

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>