HOME | DD

Published: 2016-09-20 01:52:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 7892; Favourites: 82; Downloads: 96
Redirect to original
Description
Back to Dixie, because I need to finish it. Here's Dixie-5. The source material tells us that this diverged with Early's Raid, led to British involvement in the Civil War on the Confederacy's behalf (after emancipation, oddly enough), has transformed the CSA into an impoverished British puppet and the United States into a "fanatical garrison state" between British Canada and the CSA. The Soviet Union (which I renamed to make it clear that this isn't the same as ours) also exists, and is aligned with the Union. This one brings up interesting possibilities. I think it's clear that the British are still the top dogs, and the primary Cold War opposition to the Soviets. They likely forced emancipation on the Confederacy as a condition for intervention, and later extorted more from the Confederates, leading to them becoming a puppet. Perhaps the British, not trusting the Confederates to handle their black population, supported a variant of the Liberia plan and settled freed American slaves in West Africa? This alt-Liberia would certainly be interesting, and that's what I've chosen to do here: Liberia is an independent British ally that is made up primarily of freed Confederate slaves...who promptly enslaved the locals using what they learned from the Confederates, before having this banned by the British in the 1920s.As for the Union, I decided not to make them communist just because they're aligned with the Soviets. I see this relationship being one of convenience, but I can imagine the Union being leftier than the OTL United States as a way of distinguishing itself from the British. It's still highly nationalistic and "anti-imperialist," which just means it hates the British and their allies. The same can be said for the Chinese, which had a more effective Boxer Rebellion and managed to create a strongly anti-Western republic, and the Union of India, which is the product of a major Indian revolt that placed an initially pro-British government that later turned anti-British thanks to radial nationalists being voted in during the first elections. That was a major blow to British foreign relations and has informed their later colonial policy, which is crackdowns. The Soviets themselves are under a "National Bolshevik" ideology, which is basically the lovechild of Nazism and Stalinism. Nice folks, the Soviets.
What of the rest of the world? I'm going to diverge from my usual style and go out on a limb here: there have been no world wars, and the closest we get are some regional war in the Balkans and foreign intervention during the Russian Civil War. This explains continued British dominance to an extent: it never had to spend the blood and treasure ours did. Much of Europe is relatively stable, with France and the German Empire in Britain's camp. Austria may have collapsed, but I can see a coalition of European powers putting that Humpty Dumpty back together again (to a degree). I've gone for a weird mix of pre-WWI, pre-WWII and Cold War themes, with the world firmly divided between communism and capitalism, but with the capitalist side being the great powers of Europe, not the United States. This matches the tech description, which evidently has the Entente sphere flying around in jet aircraft, while the Soviets are stuck in the Edwardian era. The United States, however, is highly advanced, with smartguns, blinding lasers, and unmanned combat vehicles. Perhaps some of these technological wonders are being exported to the Soviets and keep the balance of power in check. I suspect both sides have nukes.
Related content
Comments: 31
QuantumBranching [2016-09-22 08:25:44 +0000 UTC]
Hmm. I dunno if a Russian revolution without the massive stressor of WWI would have led to the extremist left taking over - but then I wouldn't have predicted President Trump, either.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to QuantumBranching [2016-09-22 16:25:28 +0000 UTC]
I wanted to mix things up a bit by having no great wars, but SJG explicitly named the Union's Soviet allies. I guess the 1905 revolution or an equivalent never happened, and there was a bad famine because of weather changes due to butterflies?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
QuantumBranching In reply to RvBOMally [2016-09-23 01:36:49 +0000 UTC]
Well, "Soviet" originally just meant "council", as in "workers councils", so this world's "Soviet Union" could be politically very different from OTL. But making it a brutal Red Dictatorship is probably more in the spirit it was intended by the writers of the book. (Communist worlds seem pretty horrid in GURPS Infinite Worlds: my impression was that of the the original writers for GURPS Alternate Earths Kenneth Hite was rather more doctrinally anti-Reds than Craig Neumeier, and it was Hite, not Neumeier, that came back for Infinite Worlds. But just IMHO).
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PinkJenkin In reply to QuantumBranching [2016-09-27 22:04:20 +0000 UTC]
Hite is a pretty well-known conservative Republican, but IMO he's always been able to separate his political opinions from his professional life, like most good writers. I just think crappy worlds are more fun to write.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RvBOMally In reply to QuantumBranching [2016-09-23 02:48:14 +0000 UTC]
Right, I changed the name of the Soviet Union here to indicate that it isn't our USSR. And given the tech level of the Soviet Union in Dixie-5, it's got to be some kind of backwards red dictatorship.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
QuantumBranching In reply to RvBOMally [2016-09-24 06:07:42 +0000 UTC]
Or maybe a backwards agrarian anarchic Tolstoyan federation?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jrh222 [2016-09-21 02:00:15 +0000 UTC]
Now with their technological advantage, do you imagine Dixie-5 America a rich country, or is it impoverished, with the tech going to the military only?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to jrh222 [2016-09-21 04:27:30 +0000 UTC]
Impoverished, with tech going only to the military.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RvBOMally In reply to Meerkat92 [2016-09-21 21:01:42 +0000 UTC]
A side effect of how the Qing set up their borders for Mongolia.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
1saby [2016-09-20 11:06:45 +0000 UTC]
I like this!
Is that an independent... Istria? What is it?
And why is Afghanistan coloured as a Soviet puppet when it's and emirate?
Also, did Germany ever own Alsace-Lorraine?
Edit: What's up with Taiwan?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to 1saby [2016-09-21 21:02:49 +0000 UTC]
That is an independent, Slovene and Croat Istria.
That is a mistake.
No.
Japanese.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PachPachis [2016-09-20 02:46:04 +0000 UTC]
I was always intrigued by the idea of America and the Soviet Union allying based on their shared distaste of European colonialism. Good job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
OneHellofaBird In reply to PachPachis [2016-09-21 00:35:52 +0000 UTC]
actually working one TL like that--the twist is that France and Britain are socialists who almost worship Orwell and think they're liberating the world from Red totalitarians and the cowardly Americans who sided with them (and screwed them over in two world wars)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PachPachis In reply to OneHellofaBird [2016-09-21 02:59:20 +0000 UTC]
Interesting. I imagine America would find the USSR a more palatable ally in the face of a 1984 style dictatorship, and vice versa.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OneHellofaBird In reply to PachPachis [2016-09-23 01:58:45 +0000 UTC]
and the superpowers in turn save a lot of money and avoid overpowering the CIA/KGB by ending the Cold War--there's so many turning-points OTL where we could've "made up"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RvBOMally In reply to PachPachis [2016-09-20 02:57:31 +0000 UTC]
Steve Jackson Games said they were allies, and the reasoning for that, I can only guess.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Void-Wolf In reply to RvBOMally [2016-09-20 03:02:24 +0000 UTC]
I guess enemy of my enemy is my friend plus that without the South, the US became more progressive at a quicker pace than OTL.
I also picture the Mexicans still don't like the Confeds all that much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Void-Wolf [2016-09-20 03:13:05 +0000 UTC]
That's really all there is to it, I suspect. The United States is practically a dictatorship, while the Confederacy is more democratic thanks to British influence.
The Mexicans prefer the Confederates to the Americans, who are belligerent assholes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PersephoneEosopoulou In reply to PachPachis [2016-09-20 02:55:31 +0000 UTC]
I've always found that interesting given Manifest Destiny was American colonialism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
RvBOMally In reply to PersephoneEosopoulou [2016-09-20 05:02:23 +0000 UTC]
Hypocrisy doesn't stop anybody.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PersephoneEosopoulou In reply to RvBOMally [2016-09-20 05:09:46 +0000 UTC]
It's usually not so blatant though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to PersephoneEosopoulou [2016-09-20 05:11:58 +0000 UTC]
There are actually plenty of examples of hypocrisy that is just as blatant. At any rate, subtlety is irrelevant. Power is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PersephoneEosopoulou In reply to RvBOMally [2016-09-20 05:34:23 +0000 UTC]
True that but subtlety is exciting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PachPachis In reply to PersephoneEosopoulou [2016-09-20 03:14:44 +0000 UTC]
Oh, it was hypocritical, I'm not saying it wasn't. But it happened, and was one of the few things both we and the Soviets could pay lip service to together!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PersephoneEosopoulou In reply to PachPachis [2016-09-20 03:17:48 +0000 UTC]
I wasn't accusing you of painting it in a non-hypocritical way. I meant as a general thing rather then directing it at anyone sorry!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PachPachis In reply to PersephoneEosopoulou [2016-09-20 03:29:39 +0000 UTC]
No problem. You're right, it's an interesting dichotomy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0