HOME | DD

Published: 2010-02-28 18:05:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 921; Favourites: 57; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
_____Related content
Comments: 12
pmaeck [2010-07-29 12:53:40 +0000 UTC]
All your work has such startling beauty, intelligence, and insightfulness. Much of it is knife-edge, lustrous, or both. Then there is a piece like this one here, whose edges are fibrous instead of sharp; whose tonal transitions are progessive instead of abrupt and absolute. There is a fascinating dramatic question in your work: what is literal and what is conjured? The question, though, is moot in the sense that once something literal is depicted as art, it becomes an artifice - the artificial gaining in visual, psychological, and aesthetic significance over that upon which it is based.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
S4SH4X In reply to pmaeck [2010-07-29 21:53:26 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much. I'm really flattered by your comment.
I completely agree that once something is depicted as art, it is no longer literal. The literal is left behind in the process of creating. You can't create without conjuring, just as you can't spell "artifice" without "art".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WMDPhotography [2010-03-01 02:30:34 +0000 UTC]
This one is really great. Wonderful black and white.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1