HOME | DD

sandcastler — Webbed Toes

Published: 2013-05-03 08:40:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 302621; Favourites: 1229; Downloads: 661
Redirect to original
Description Fantastic piece I commissioned some time ago. Artist & stock account long-gone, sadly.  No 'mature' tag because you can't see anything that's not on broadcast network TV.

It's a photomanipulation people...not real!!  This is how Ariel should've looked when Ursula gave her legs!  Also, this is what Aquaman's old girlfriend Dolphin looked like, as well as Fathom from the Comico series 'Elementals,' & lastly Marrina from 'Alpha Flight.'  Comic fish-girls set in human form...git yer minds outta the gutter!!  Mermaids can have legs, too...they've just gotta have webbed toes to complete the fishy look!  Maybe she's from Innsmouth?  H.P. Lovecraft would be proud!  I could tint her skin blue & call her Lagoona from Monster High!  ...The Creature's niece.   See, lots of 'webbed' babes to be found!!

IF YOU CAN PHOTOSHOP LIKE THIS, send me a note...I might commission YOU next time
Related content
Comments: 915

wolf123825 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 12:01:14 +0000 UTC]

Idk why but I really wanna cut through da webs with a bread knife idk why its just weird

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Otro-amor-eterno In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 11:56:14 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful! Cute girl

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zombifaction In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 11:35:53 +0000 UTC]

Aw she doesn't have kickass webbed feet? Damn.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gimmethaloot In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 11:20:02 +0000 UTC]

who's the chick?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandcastler In reply to gimmethaloot [2014-12-30 23:10:09 +0000 UTC]

Long-gone stock account....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gimmethaloot In reply to sandcastler [2014-12-31 03:53:50 +0000 UTC]

...?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PicksKing In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 11:17:54 +0000 UTC]

EWWW!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kohlsen In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 10:28:18 +0000 UTC]

........sorry,I`m more interested in the girl. ........ ........................ (; . ...... ----- - -

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chjapa In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 09:09:41 +0000 UTC]

Chloe?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Firefly1247 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 09:02:34 +0000 UTC]

This looks amazing! is this real or photoshoped? ((cuz webbed feet & fingers are real))

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

yoyuu In reply to Firefly1247 [2014-12-30 09:48:51 +0000 UTC]

photoshop

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Firefly1247 In reply to yoyuu [2014-12-30 10:18:47 +0000 UTC]

Its still cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlondBeastBoy In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 08:53:47 +0000 UTC]

Well, looks like she could swim without any problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RobertoCarlos1998 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 08:44:20 +0000 UTC]

that is actually pretty CollColl

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MoonGoneDark In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 08:33:50 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

ZoombiiPanda In reply to MoonGoneDark [2014-12-30 09:37:03 +0000 UTC]

Well, considering the category alone tells you it's photo-manipulation, this comment kinda made you look like an ass.
If you'd taken literally a second to just glance at the description or anywhere near it, you'd have seen this is infact not real and is very much art since it's a manipulation, which is obviously well done if you mistook it for the real thing. :/
There was no need to go and slander it, saying it's ew and inartistic. Sure, she commissioned it and she didn't do it herself, but it's still art nonetheless. 

I agree she didn't really need to be naked taking the photo though. I hate it when I see half-naked, over sexualized women on the front page, because imo it isn't really art, it's just looking for attention. But the excessive amount of skin isn't really what drew me to this, especially since she herself is out of focus, I just saw the webbed foot and was curious as to whether it was real or handiwork. If it had of turned out to be real I would've been questioning why it was on the front page aswell tbh

& your claim on it being on the front page because "there are thousands of creepy horny fetish weirdos" is kinda invalid, I've scrolled through 3 tabs of the comments now and have yet to see one overly creepy and weird comment. There may be some further on but obviously not as many as you're stating.
There's plenty of people just asking if it's real, who obviously didn't take time to look at the category, and many others saying it looks weird/cool/creepy and other statements of the sort.

It was wrong of her to upload a commissioned piece with no credit, and the lack of clothing could've been done without, but other than those two there isn't much wrong with it, yet you're treating it like it's the worst thing on this site. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandcastler In reply to ZoombiiPanda [2014-12-30 23:13:45 +0000 UTC]

Relieve me, I'd LOVE to give credit, but it's from a long-lost manipulation artist & long-closed stock account. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AngeloDellaMusica In reply to MoonGoneDark [2014-12-30 08:53:41 +0000 UTC]

Okay, a lot of what you just said is 100% true- and I can totally relate to wanting to share my opinion on things like that. However, looking at the description, I think the webbing is prosthetic or photo-manipulation- which makes sense: if you look to the right of the piece, you'll see there are drawings, manips, etc. of webbed hands and feet. 

Honestly, the only thing I can find 'wrong' about this photo is that the person who uploaded it did not actually make it- they commissioned it- and they aren't giving credit (it's not even their art, they shouldn't be posting it as though it is). Aside from that....

By the by, if you scroll down the comments, quite a few are essentially shorter versions of you own: 'This is weird...'   'Uh That person is naked'     'E-Eww... I mean cool, but ew. ;_;'     'Webbed feet=no views set naked with webbed feet=front page Yeah I know where the most of the community's mindset is, and it's not a good place. We're better than this people....you don't need to get naked to get views just grow up.'

Thanks for sharing your opinion though  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlondBeastBoy In reply to MoonGoneDark [2014-12-30 08:53:08 +0000 UTC]

You think that's bad? There are roughly 10,000 deviations in this site devoted to sick Tails fetishes alone.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SgraffitoFerret In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 08:31:02 +0000 UTC]

You're posting a "commissioned" piece that you did not, in fact, do... you do not remember the artist to credit them... and yet you are posting their piece without any actual reference to having permissions to do so?

Mhm.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandcastler In reply to SgraffitoFerret [2014-12-30 23:18:38 +0000 UTC]

Stock account...long closed. Artist split the scene, too. I commissioned this, paid for it; it's mine to display as I wish. Not getting compensated...no commercial use.  No harm, no foul. What am I to do, keep it locked away?  No thanks. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jester-Lufercious In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 08:10:21 +0000 UTC]

Cool XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aquare24 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 08:07:04 +0000 UTC]

This is weird...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tails16 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 07:52:33 +0000 UTC]

Uh That person is naked

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Eternal-Master In reply to Tails16 [2014-12-30 08:31:32 +0000 UTC]

...Seriously? -.-

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tails16 In reply to Eternal-Master [2015-01-03 00:54:16 +0000 UTC]

It needs Nudity is what I meant

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Eternal-Master In reply to Tails16 [2015-01-03 05:39:48 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I see. You mean it should have the active filter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tails16 In reply to Eternal-Master [2015-01-08 00:06:03 +0000 UTC]

yeah

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

farbuntreu In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 07:28:00 +0000 UTC]

Very cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hyperion9182 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 07:27:24 +0000 UTC]

Can I...touch it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

floput In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 07:07:46 +0000 UTC]

It looks funny

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aglassofbluelemonade In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 07:02:13 +0000 UTC]

...boobs showing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheiCarlyAngel In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 06:57:01 +0000 UTC]

E-Eww... I mean cool, but ew. ;_;

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KittyBuu22 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 06:33:20 +0000 UTC]

Is this real?
And if so, I bet you are a SICK swimmer. Haha!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Mad-Cartoonist In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 06:27:37 +0000 UTC]

Okay. Pretty cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cooldresser In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 06:26:30 +0000 UTC]

you frog or what?????????????

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zenie250 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 06:20:53 +0000 UTC]

What the hell!? cool and freaky..is..is it real?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vashkunthestampede In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 06:12:32 +0000 UTC]

Webbed feet=no views
Get naked with webbed feet=front page

Yeah I know where the most of the community's mindset is, and it's not a good place. We're better than this people....you don't need to get naked to get views just grow up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

KaylaKedziora In reply to Vashkunthestampede [2014-12-30 10:25:53 +0000 UTC]

exactly!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BastardCutter In reply to Vashkunthestampede [2014-12-30 07:08:44 +0000 UTC]

SJW.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Swagmaster6969696954 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 05:57:31 +0000 UTC]

whoa, looks extremely realistic, great work (I hope it's not real) 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aglassofbluelemonade In reply to Swagmaster6969696954 [2014-12-30 07:05:23 +0000 UTC]

um, its real, asshole with no sensitivity NAD OMG ITS SWAGMASTER.
SPARKIE!!!!!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Swagmaster6969696954 In reply to aglassofbluelemonade [2014-12-30 07:06:12 +0000 UTC]

sparkie...?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aglassofbluelemonade In reply to Swagmaster6969696954 [2014-12-30 07:12:19 +0000 UTC]

da

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Swagmaster6969696954 In reply to aglassofbluelemonade [2014-12-30 07:13:22 +0000 UTC]

I don't believe I'm the swagmaster you speak of

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aglassofbluelemonade In reply to Swagmaster6969696954 [2014-12-30 07:35:40 +0000 UTC]

you aint

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Opportunity0904 In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 05:57:05 +0000 UTC]

......................................................................................................................................  -_______-  creepy

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheShyOrganization In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 05:49:36 +0000 UTC]

IM SCARED

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MajinZach In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 05:42:25 +0000 UTC]

That's pretty awesome! Cute model as well

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

deathsdream In reply to ??? [2014-12-30 05:41:31 +0000 UTC]

Was thinking all 'well, hmm, she seems pretty attractive...' and then glance over and 'oh!  wtf!'

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>