HOME | DD
sandcastler — Webbed Toes
Published: 2013-05-03 08:40:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 302538; Favourites: 1229; Downloads: 661
Redirect to original
Description
Fantastic piece I commissioned some time ago. Artist & stock account long-gone, sadly. No 'mature' tag because you can't see anything that's not on broadcast network TV.It's a photomanipulation people...not real!! This is how Ariel should've looked when Ursula gave her legs!
Also, this is what Aquaman's old girlfriend Dolphin looked like, as well as Fathom from the Comico series 'Elementals,' & lastly Marrina from 'Alpha Flight.' Comic fish-girls set in human form...git yer minds outta the gutter!! Mermaids can have legs, too...they've just gotta have webbed toes to complete the fishy look! Maybe she's from Innsmouth? H.P. Lovecraft would be proud! I could tint her skin blue & call her Lagoona from Monster High! ...The Creature's niece. See, lots of 'webbed' babes to be found!!IF YOU CAN PHOTOSHOP LIKE THIS, send me a note...I might commission YOU next time
Related content
Comments: 915
Super fascinating! I thought this was real at first haha!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wow,are your feet really webbed?? O.O
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
omg guys im sorry i didnt know xD
forgive my little lamb-chops~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gotta love the Picard Face-Palm!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
**Photomanipulation
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This is the perfect response lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You could always go for the "we are all naked, under our clothes' line.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh, I saw this on 9gag & thought it was real! Now that's a true professional photoshop - I can't see any flaw!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh that's really neat! I thought it was real for a second xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yep. Those are some neat metatarsals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Very good job. No guys it's really not bad. Even if you are weirded out, there are far worse things than webbed toes (even if they are photoshopped)
It's cute first off sandcastler. this girl, whoever she is. Is so cute the picture Is great just because of her face in it. Second, nice Photoshop. 
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
This is awesome and, yeah, she really HAD to be naked. Awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Did she really HAD to be naked?
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
I keep asking myself that same question. Like, the whole point of the image is her WEBBED feet! Not her nakedness. Maybe it's for sex appeal? But I really feel that the half nip-slip wasn't necessary for her to show. So, I agree.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mhmm I still like the art though....just was asking why she had to be naked in a picture that has nothing to do with the webbed foot
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's what I was talking about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ik I can see her freaking nipple O~O
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
I know right? DX
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Okay and if you dumb down the word "areola" what do you get?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You still get areola. The areola and the nipple are two different parts
of the breast. What is only to be seen in the picture above is the very
tip of the areola.
The only explanation it "dumbs down" to is a pigmented ring of color.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oii mudda asshole im not going to argue with ya so if you like seeing nipples, or "areolas" be my guest
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not my fault you're ignorant of breasts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, I am becuz I dont obsess over titties, and like I stated before, I dont want to argue
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well that's a lie since your first comment was focused on the fact you could see
her areola and the fact you're still replying about the said topic even though this
convo happened over 2 weeks ago.
If you didn't wish to argue or carry on the conversation then you shouldn't
have replied and just ignored my simple "okay?" comment or the last comment
I made a minute ago. At this point you're simply choosing to carry it on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Becuz I like having the very last damn word.... O-O
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
At least you can admit it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeh I did ^-^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>