HOME | DD
SaritysAnimation β Struggle For Control
Published: 2013-04-10 02:46:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 18785; Favourites: 999; Downloads: 106
Redirect to original
Description
I'll leave it at that.Related content
Comments: 1121
Been there, done that.
π: 0 β©: 0
I thought this was the artist thinking that people struggle with what they want in sexuality and thinking the Church (no specific denomination) wants to keep sexuality as how they say it should be.
I'll "spew" the bible and its applications wherever it's needed. People are born wanting things to do, but Christ has better plans for us. The old saying "I'm a [whatever], I'm not dead" means I'm a Christian and I want to do things because I love God (in this case), but I am still human with human wants.
Would you marry someone but not live like you married them?
π: 0 β©: 1
What do you mean, would I not live like I married them? I am not an unfaithful person, and I have self-control.
The Church has a history of not tolerating people, and had women as slaves until 1996. Again, look up the Magdalene Laundries if you didn't before.
Telling people that "Christ has better plans for us" is not an excuse to tell people how to live. People are individuals, and have individual wills, which they should be allowed to exercise, except in cases of harm to others. How do you know that Christ has better plans? Did he speak to you? No. The Church does that, supposedly on his behalf. Mortals, people, men. The same people who wrote down His supposed word. I think that God, if he guides anyone, does not do it through such an institution.
π: 0 β©: 1
The church has a history of not tolerating sin. Because God doesn't. Jesus died for it.
It may be radical to practice repentance and live in a way that reflects your thankfulness for your salvation, but I'm not the first one to tell other people about it.
π: 0 β©: 1
The Church hunted and killed in the name of a God that famously said "Thou shalt not kill." The Spanish Inquisition happened. It isn't continuing, but it's definitely there. The point is that the Church is not God, nor is it truly representative of God.
There is nothing wrong with practicing repentance, of course. There isn't anything wrong with not being a moral person. There is, however, something wrong with trying to control somebody and hold them back from doing what they wish, so long as it does not harm others. What makes you so sure that God supports your view? You have no evidence that He doesn't support mine instead. I don't have to evidence that he does, I'm not the one saying I know.
π: 0 β©: 0
Shut the fuck up, you self loathing lunatic.
π: 0 β©: 0
Honestly? This is depressing to read the comments on. I thought the picture was purely amazing and /that/ is why I'm leaving a comment. Creative picture. I enjoy it.
Sariti, ignore the other comments. Rude, just rude...
π: 0 β©: 0
Men should keep their dicks in their pants. Women should keep their legs shuts. and abortion would never be mentioned.
π: 0 β©: 5
And no children would ever be born! Yahoo!
π: 0 β©: 1
The world is already over populated we don't need more people.
π: 0 β©: 1
... are you really this stupid or are you trying to make a point?
If everyone, literally everyone, did as you said, there would be no next generation. I agree the world is overpopulated, but if no one bred the human race would die out. Do you get that?
π: 0 β©: 1
How rude! I'm not say people to stop breeding. I'm saying for people to stop doing stupid things. If someone wants an abortion, then obviously the don't want a kid. It wouldn't have been an issue if people just keep their cloths on and not risk it in the first place.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes and I'm pointing out that sex is how babies get made.
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm going to burn a bible in your honor.
π: 0 β©: 1
Have fun with that. What ever that suppose to accomplish...
π: 0 β©: 1
Sort of like your comment. Whatever it means....
π: 0 β©: 1
Just, have fun with that.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're repeating yourself.
π: 0 β©: 1
lol, I have no other way of saying that. 
π: 0 β©: 0
There's this thing called having sex with your legs closed, maybe if you tried it you wouldn't be so uptight? Abortion is inevitable, maybe people who don't like it should mind their own damn business.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't know, and I don't think I want to know. I definitely don't want to try it with any one. If you bang everything with two legs and a vagina, great for you. Abortion isn't the only option. And I have a right to voice my opinion as I see fit. and if you don't like it, then maybe you should mind your own damn business.
π: 0 β©: 0
You know that the majority expresses their love with intercourse, right. I think "People should use some kind of protection" is what you're looking for.
π: 0 β©: 1
I hear for far to long people having intercourse that isn't out of love. If two people love each other very much, and that how they choose to express it. All power to them, congratulations, hope they're happy together. But don't be surprised when a condom breaks and the chick gets knocked up. the first option shouldn't be abortion, it isn't fair for the child. Don't want the brat or can't take care of it put it up for adoption. abortion shouldn't be an option unless it's life threatening.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dumbest thing I've ever heard.
π: 0 β©: 3
How unfortunate.
π: 0 β©: 1
For you, perhaps.
π: 0 β©: 0
AGREED <3
Love,
Harumi <3
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm glad some one does.
π: 0 β©: 0
This could easily be misread as the church putting a ban on masturbation
π: 0 β©: 1
Not really. What harm does it do when females do it; they're not "wasting/killing" any potential children with their orgasms.
π: 0 β©: 0
Just that many people seek guidance and not control. The church itself only has power because the people it to them.
π: 0 β©: 0
the problem with abortion, is that the intelligent people are smart enough to utilize the option, and the pro lifers just keep on breeding. our gene pool is now a cess pool of idiocy.
π: 0 β©: 1
Idiocy isn't genetic; it's learned. "Idiocracy" is a dark comedy, not a anthropological study.
π: 0 β©: 1
you are correct, idiocracy is not AN anthropological study. however, with nothing more than my eyes and ears, I can tell you that stupid people commonly produce stupid children. I'm sure there are exceptions to the rule that I've just made, but not nearly enough to invalidate the statement. please don't respond to this, I'm not looking for an intelligent argument.
π: 0 β©: 0
We are into abortion now ?! Well...
A woman who is ready to abort should not have sex at all until she change her mind. Like everything, you have to deal with the consequences of your actions. The baby is NEVER responsible for your choices or for what happen to you. He is human being and have the right to be alive, no matter what.
π: 0 β©: 10
Oooh I'm not even going to go into the psychology of you calling all babies "he"...
π: 0 β©: 1
It's because i'm French Einstein, so we say "il" (he) in France because "bΓ©bΓ©"(baby) is a masculine word. Simple mistake. Got it ?
π: 0 β©: 0
In German (respective: Viennese) there's a fitting saying for people like you: "Heast, Oida, BIST du so DEPPAT, oder STΓST di nur so?"
So a woman is responsible for being raped? Or killed. Or what-ever.
NO! NEVER! The ATTACKER is the ONLY ONE who's RESPONSIBLE for his actions ALONE!
On a side note: Of course, contraception can't prevent rape from happening, and if the woman is taking the pill, it's still a grave attack on her integrity as a person, BUT! she won't have to deal with something which is a reminiscence on that assault forever.
π: 0 β©: 0
A woman who is ready to abort should not have sex at all until she change her mind
And a man should of course never had sex either until he can deal with the potential consequence of taking care of a child for the rest of his life too, right? Or is pregnancy only a consequence of the woman's actions simply because she's the one suffering from them?
It takes two to tango. Why does all responsibility fall onto the woman and not the man? Is it her body's fault for getting pregnant? If you want to force a woman to give birth to and take care of a child, why shouldn't the other part be forced to do the same?
And if men shouldn't have to take the same responsibility, how come they are allowed to have any power in this question at all? Of course it's simple to think about something that could never happen to yourself.
π: 0 β©: 0
A woman should decide over her own body. Im sorry but, i have had a boyfriend for over 3 years and i will be 21 this year. I have sex with him because i love him, and because its a choice i make myself. but that does not mean im ready to have a child. So thats why i use protection.
If i ever were to get pregnant, i would get an abortion simply because i cannot afford a child and because i do not want it, and i do not worry for getting something removed that does not even has a brain yet or a perception of reality.
π: 0 β©: 1
There's no "perfect" moment or situation for a child. Also there a many ways even without money.
I never meet my father and in some eyes may I'm a bastard. It was noth easy for my mother, but it was never an option for here, to "gettin' rid" of me. Also it was never easy for me, but I'm happy about here decision.
Furthermore, It's not just about "controlling" the body of a woman, at least not for everyone. It's more about the moral aspect.
Howsoever, do what ever you wan't. Your life. Just sayin'.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sure there is not, but one does know when they can or cannot afford a child. And i cannot. So i dont choose to have one.
I wouldn't say you're a bastard simply because you cant help it that has happened to you, but in order to prevent such things from happening a woman can choose sex protection or abortion.
π: 0 β©: 1
If you know you cannot afford to raise a child, you should abstain from the sexual behavior that might lead to one. And if you do conceive, why is it okay to snuff out the new life you've created? Do you know what the term is for killing humans?
π: 0 β©: 2
Don't you think abstain from the sexual behavior is a lil' bit exaggerated, don't you? It's not that she isn't doing something to prevent this situation in contrast to other woman.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't know what you mean by exaggerated, but if you don't want children, the safest course is abstinence. Like most others, I'd like to have sex, too. But I don't want to indulge until I'm either ready for kids, or ready to accept the consequences of my actions.
π: 0 β©: 0
How is it human if its only stem cells?
I have sex and i dont want a kid. Ive been with my boyfriend for 3 years now and i use birth control. So what, im not allowed to have sex with him until im sure i want a kid?
I dont even want kids at all, so i should be the virgin mary forever or something?
π: 0 β©: 2
Only stem cells, yes. But's still a potential life.
π: 0 β©: 1
That does not mean i wish to have it.
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>