HOME | DD

Published: 2009-11-04 15:06:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 14313; Favourites: 232; Downloads: 89
Redirect to original
Description
Prints now available on my new website EricNinaltowskiart.com! Visit my store at [link]Since this is a political piece, and I don’t want it to be taken the wrong way, let me say a few things.
1. Red Skull is not dead, nor do I wish harm on our President
2. It’s not because he’s black
3. I’m not saying Obama is a Nazi but that his ideals are radical and are dangerous
4. President Obama is not the only one responsible, nor deserves all the blame, there’s plenty to go around. However, as is the case with all leaders, they always have a posse and surround themselves with assistance.
It is our President’s ideals and agenda that I strongly disagree with and would urge people to be informed about knowing what they are. From nationalizing banks, and car companies, to pushing for partial birth abortions, and trying to spear-head the Socialization of our Health Care system, it is obvious he is fundamentally trying to change the foundation of America as we know it. Also I do not believe he is honest and upfront with the American people and is constantly using lip-service to gather support for his agenda. The media doesn’t help in this respect with it’s leftist bias’ and smear campaign of everything that is contrary to our President and his policies. The Left is heavy handed and pushing hard for it’s way, meanwhile the people and citizens who are speaking out are being shut up and discriminated against.
But what worries me the most and what confirms my suspicions are those who our President surrounds himself with.
Who does he surround himself with? Communists, Marxists, and revolutionaries.
William Ayers (who the president has not denounced but rather denied being friends with), who is responsible for terrorist acts on American soil. Jeff Jones, who along with Ayers founded the Weather underground, a group who bombed the pentagon and police stations. Where are they now? Bill Ayers a professor at the University of Illinois, while Jeff Jones runs a consulting firm and chairs the Apollo Alliance in New York — the same Apollo Alliance that wrote the stimulus package.
Our President sat in the pew of a Preacher of Black Liberation Theology, and mentored under the man, and was married by him, but somehow seemed to have walked in and out for 20 years without even a blemish to his worldview? If you don’t know what Black Liberation Theology is then you’ll just have to look it up but you won’t have to look far to find quotes from Rev. Wright, like “God Bless America? God Damn America is more like it?”
Anita Dunn, White House Communications director told an assembly of High School students that her two favorite people were Mother Theresa and Mao Tse Tung. She called him one of her favorite “political philosophers,” while Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski labels him possibly the greatest, “manipulator of large masses of human beings in the 20th century.” It was his Communist political philosophy that lead to the deaths of millions. Or maybe she just enjoys his “enemies of the state” campaign, or his “Anti-rightist” campaign, or maybe his campaign to purify the “capitalists,” and “counter-revolutionaries.”
John Holdren, Obama appointed Science Czar, believes in zero population growth. How? By population control, sterilizing women (with a procedure more complicated than a vasectomy), compulsory or forced abortions, and compulsory population control laws! It’s all in his book, Eco-Science.
Van Jones, the former Green jobs Czar, who is a self avowed Communist, Marxist, and anarchist. Where did he learn about all this, and Green Jobs? Jail. "I met all these young radical people of color – I mean really radical: communists and anarchists. And it was, like, 'This is what I need to be a part of.' I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary."
Obama is pushing hard to enact changes for so-called “Global warming,” while the science behind it isn’t even universally proven or agreed upon. Environmentalists who call for change believe that people are secondary when it comes to the life of the environment and the animals and life it supports. Who think we have a “moral” obligation to protect the earth. And what is the problem? Why do we have this “Climate Change?” They say there are too many people on earth. And their prescribed method of dealing with the “crisis?” Controlling the population. Ted Turner, CNN founder and billionaire Environmentalist is a fan of China’s one-child policy, (despite the brutality of forced abortion and sterilizations which are associated with it) - proposed similar limits on family size but even goes further and says, "A total world population of 250-300 million would be ideal. A 95% decline from present levels would be ideal.”
These are people who say “The world has cancer, and the cancer is man!” and “People are the cause of all the problems, we have too many of them, we need to get rid of some of them.” This line of thinking is dangerous and leads to destructive thinking. If you don’t believe me then you must not know your history. Our President and his ideology must be stopped, must be opposed, and must be shown for what it is. It’s time for American’s to stand up and be involved before they America they know and love looks like the rest of the world, and the freedoms we know and love are a distant memory.
Related content
Comments: 301
kingofpain0 [2017-10-10 02:11:33 +0000 UTC]
Hey stop it you're giving Captain racist a bad name
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sdiggman [2017-08-23 14:59:40 +0000 UTC]
"If you don’t believe me then you must not know your history. "
As a former Master Teacher, I hold six current teaching certificates in the following fields: World history / American History /Sociology /Psychology / Economics / American Constitution (Please note that those are TEACHING certifications for which I took multiple state and federal examinations to quality for - not just college courses)
I also maintain my certificate as a Master Teacher in Eastern Studies
I hold a BBA with dual majors: Business Management/Human Resources with a minor in marketing
I have 257 completed College hours and can apply those hours to attain 4 more BAs in multiple fields any I time that I choose to do so
If I chose to take 12 additional hours - I can apply for degrees in 3 additional fields besides the 4 additional BAs mentioned
The list of professional seminars that I have attended and completed over the years (I am 61) comprises 4.5 pages in my resume - one seminar/course per line, double spaced (correction -not double spaced, 1.5 spacing - sorry)
I am a published author in the following fields History/Military History (strategy and tactics)/Intelligence and CounterEspionage/Religion/Foreign Affairs and Policy
I am a former intelligence analyst for a non-governmental agency and have been a contracted civilian specialist in several matters that never made the light of day
I know my history
and yours
In my professional opinion of your drool (excuse me, I meant to say "your written analysis")
you are indeed a racist
AND a frikkin idiot
to boot
sdiggman
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WOLFBLADE111 [2017-08-04 23:28:15 +0000 UTC]
Funny how right this was. XD lol Before someone goes and says I'm a White Supremacist lemme just say this. Did Obama do anything at all that helped America and not just other countries?
I'll admit I'm racist, against criminals and lying sacks of shit like Obama. If they ain't criminals then their fine in my book but if their some nut job or criminal then Skin color has Nothing to do with it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
UltimateCy [2017-08-02 14:17:30 +0000 UTC]
Does it bother you that white supremacists are showing up in the comments to say they love this?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
SaviorsSon In reply to UltimateCy [2017-08-21 21:05:07 +0000 UTC]
Hey anyone can show up and say whatever they want, I believe in free speech, I don't have to agree with it, but it's all good with me. When free speech dies, so does America.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BLUPROPAGANDA [2017-02-05 00:09:27 +0000 UTC]
Why did this come up on a search for "professor jones"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thagoddess9 [2017-01-22 06:24:57 +0000 UTC]
Meanwhile, in Murica... 5 states are trying to move legistation to criminalize peaceful protest...gerrymandering amd voter suppression took a huge leap when the Voting Rights Act was altered...arts funding and some public services are hitting the chopping block...and the national parks service was censored and muzzled for appearing to note the new "leader" unfavorably. The Perfect hidden Parasite is emerging (rapidly). Hail Hydra. (Shout out to russia!) Cap got the wrong guy. And now it may be too late.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aero3-5 [2016-09-22 18:50:29 +0000 UTC]
I disagree with the message of the poster. There are a lot of political comments on this. My response is that the only way of showing your political ideas is what you do in the voting booth. Arguing over this only means that the politicians are controlling you !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SaviorsSon In reply to aero3-5 [2016-09-22 18:51:25 +0000 UTC]
Not necessarily, one can have a personal opinion, no?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aero3-5 In reply to SaviorsSon [2016-09-22 19:04:11 +0000 UTC]
Yes that is the most important thing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Warrior-of-Faith [2015-11-30 17:07:51 +0000 UTC]
Good job Cap!
I knew it, he was working for Hydra!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheWolfJarl [2015-10-06 17:00:13 +0000 UTC]
Better than living in a state where the rich control the poor.
Oh yes; I'm a socialist, advocating for free healthcare, that corporations have to pay their dues, and all politics must be secular. Face it; the system people like you advocate is nothing but a disguised mode of Social Darwinism where the rich dominate the poor and the religious right oppresses those who do not wish to live their lives in its tyranny.
But what do I know right? Coming from a Scandinavian welfare state with some of the lowest poverty ratings and highest health ratings since we don't judge a citizen's worth by the dollar.
Ayn Rand must be so proud of you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OddGarfield [2015-10-03 22:45:16 +0000 UTC]
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.” -Ben Franklin
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OddGarfield In reply to SaviorsSon [2017-08-22 05:20:57 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for your regards.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MasonBricke [2014-10-26 18:19:31 +0000 UTC]
Ha! Deep inside, we always knew...
Don't worry, Red Skull--if you like your mask, you can keep your mask...
Smack him again, Cap!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ezseek [2014-09-23 04:54:32 +0000 UTC]
TRUTH IS HARD TO WAKE UP FROM, BECAUSE SLEEPING SHEEP THINK IT'S ONLY ART. Great job!.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SaviorsSon In reply to AmericaTheHero1337 [2014-10-27 18:16:40 +0000 UTC]
I think his policies are a direct reflection of his ideals... he's a self avowed Marxist for cryin' out loud!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AmericaTheHero1337 In reply to SaviorsSon [2014-10-30 13:00:07 +0000 UTC]
Well he's a pretty crappy one. I was hoping for a national health service by now
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Legolaselfwarrior [2014-02-09 16:24:18 +0000 UTC]
Right on SaviorsSon!!! The truth shall set you free Thank you brother for having the courage to take a stand. We have way to many low information Americans that only worry about being P.C. because they have a lack of solid values and courage; they live for praises from men, we live for our God. I'm sure your familiar with Edmund Burke's quote, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing". You my friend, are doing something
Remember in Him we already have victory, so don't let the world get you down. People will attack you, just like they attacked Jesus, that only shows you are not of this world. Be proud to suffer for Our Lord. God bless you brother!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SaviorsSon In reply to Legolaselfwarrior [2016-09-22 19:01:11 +0000 UTC]
Thank u brother! Uch appreciated!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Generalobiwankenobi7 [2014-01-30 03:24:53 +0000 UTC]
Yeah because trying to give health care to people who can't afford to pay insurance is such a terrible and radical idea that would destroy this country. Instead we should just let these people pay out of their own pockets until they're broke.
I'm not saying you aren't entitled to your opinion, but this really seems extreme. And it does seem like you're portraying Obama as a Nazi in disguise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SaviorsSon In reply to Generalobiwankenobi7 [2014-10-27 18:15:32 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for your comment. And thanks for valuing my opinion even though you may not agree. Much appreciated.
There are problems with the Health Care system and there are solutions to those problems, like opening insurance across state lines which would increase competition and drive prices down, as well as Tort reform, to stop allowing frivolous lawsuits for the smallest thing, which makes the Doctors expenses go up, and then they drive prices up for the consumer. Then there are the Pharmaceutical companies as well which don't help. So these are known problems. Instead of going against the grain of the American ideas that has lead this country to prosper for over 200 years, we are trying to be like the rest of the world. It's not helping us as a country. The fact is if the Government takes over the Healthcare system it will simply cost us more money in the long run, because there simply ain't no such thing as a free lunch. Some one will have to pay. And if the government is doing something, then it will mean they will need tax dollars to do it, or they will simply print more money and run up the deficit and bankrupt this country more. That's neither smart nor responsible. And the chickens will be coming home to roost soon.
I think that we could have done a lot better with Healthcare Reform than going a route that was socialist in it's ideal, which is not at all what this country was founded upon. And if you look at the examples of countries with socialist Healthcare systems there are tons of problems. Some countries with a total Socialistic form of Government are even turning back to a more Capitalist system because they realize it works better. Like France and China. Yeah we're moving away from what has worked for centuries and heading toward the collapse of the Free Market system.
Thanks for listening. I hope you'll consider what I've said.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Generalobiwankenobi7 In reply to SaviorsSon [2014-10-27 20:32:49 +0000 UTC]
I disagree. The problems stem from the fact that the republicans keep blocking it and keeping those who need it from getting it. It's just making it harder for the rest of us. Basically their logic is if you can't afford it you don't deserve it. People are worse off because they cannot get the help they need. Are we just to think they shouldn't get it?
Private insurances no longer work. They deny those who need the care and companies can still prevent workers who need this money from getting it based on religious or social reasons. Private health care companies are no longer as accessible. We can create competition but it really wouldn't drive prices down, or help those who need it now.
American ideas do not encompass dividing this country into those who can afford health care but don't need it, versus those who cannot afford it but need it.
When you say 200 years you are looking back on times when we didn't face the problems we have now. It's pure blindness not to realize that and continue to uphold a system that has become outdated. Also from times where we owned other people as property and boiled things rather than really cook them.
Hardly. We'd still be paying for the care through taxes, but that's nowhere's near as expensive or difficult as paying a private corporation.
I really don't get this logic. People continue to think the government doesn't work and we no longer need it. Except for oh well; running water, schools, roads, defense and security and much more. This would just be another thing they'd run, what's wrong with that. People have convinced themselves its a bad thing. And unfortunately so have you.
It's called regulated capitalism. You're talking about something being socialist without really understanding what socialism is. Also, communism and socialism also differ. As does fascism and socialism.
Free Market creates problems. That's what caused the problems that led to the Great Depression. And we were saved from the brink of disaster by the government taking over most of these businesses and functions. We are in a economic rut again, it's time the government started doing it again.
I have thought about what you said, and I still have to disagree. Hopefully you'll consider what I said and start rethinking your approach.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BaselessConclusion In reply to Generalobiwankenobi7 [2016-08-10 20:09:06 +0000 UTC]
"Except for oh well; running water, schools, roads, defense and security and much more. This would just be another thing they'd run, what's wrong with that."
Power creep, it is typically frowned upon when corporations form monopolies and such, why should it be okay for "the government" to do it? In the end, both corporations and "the government" are run by people that are likely to abuse power when they are given most of it. Especially when they have most of it. I would like to know how you could possibly type that without immediately recognizing the rebuttal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Generalobiwankenobi7 In reply to BaselessConclusion [2016-08-11 01:31:35 +0000 UTC]
Yes, let's let corporations run everything. Dictating what people can and can't do, and when they cost too much the corporate bigwigs can just cut them off.
Because it's not a monopoly, it's a simple job the government does. And here's a little fact of this country, our government is designed so people can't abuse it, that's what checks and balances serve. Corporations don't have that kind of balance of power, and there are numbskulls like Donald Trump and before him Ronald Rheagen who think it's a good idea to give corporations less oversight and more authority in how to run their business.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BaselessConclusion In reply to Generalobiwankenobi7 [2016-08-15 23:14:24 +0000 UTC]
Ah! I thank you for your willingness to discuss this with me after a few years of it being buried!
"Yes, let's let corporations run everything."
Good sir, I do believe you are setting up a straw man argument. Never said government shouldn't have a role to play. Heavily implied both the government and corps should be kept in check: "both corporations and 'the government' are run by people that are likely to abuse power"
"Because it's not a monopoly, it's a simple job the government does."
Having most of the power to do a job (you mentioned schools, roads, water, and security) is functionally a monopoly and leads to the risks of such. You ask why people think the government doesn't work, well I really don't like the status quo with compulsion in the school systems or how kids are taught in them, or really anything ever tried to get these monstrosities to work. So why would I think the government (fed or state level really)
would do a good job with medical services, single-payer or otherwise? I wouldn't.
" our government is designed so people can't abuse it, that's what checks and balances serve."
I'm glad to hear that you don't consider the Republican's blocking health reforms to be abusive in their efforts.
It is common for those that want power over others to go into government, because it is the ruling body of the US. When they are in all three branches, they can work together to continuously give the government more power and strip people of more of their liberty. Hence the general populace's hatred of lying politicians and bribing. While I am confident the checks and balances slow corruption, they do not stop it. Certainly not impossible to abuse it. The two-party system itself can be arguably considered an example of the federal government being abused. I would hope you've heard George Washington did not like large political parties forming because of corruption issues.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Generalobiwankenobi7 In reply to BaselessConclusion [2016-08-16 01:56:43 +0000 UTC]
So you really care about some argument I had years ago?
You can sugarcoat it all you want, in the end you'd be more than satisfied with letting businesses run things instead of legitimate governments.
It's not a monopoly. It's something every government needs to do. It's called looking after the people of this country. Corporations on the other hand generally don't care about looking after people, they care about making a profit. If they handled social services they'd cut off those who couldn't pay for these services out of their own pockets for "cost efficiency". Running a government is not like running a business, unlike what Paul Ryan is trying to do. Cut off people who are unable to take care of themselves because somehow that will help them get back on their own feet.
People who constantly complain about how the government doesn't work usually don't know how the government works themselves, which is why they complain. They can't understand what goes on and how long change takes.
The things needed to change in the school system are many. One is giving better pay to teachers and school services. But the Republicans refuse to allow this.
The government is doing a better job with medical service than most businesses, since it gives people nowadays who can't afford social security a way out. That's the whole point of Obamacare, and despite what the conservatives would have you believe, it's saved lives. And that's speaking from personal experience. Taking that away and giving in to private businesses is going to hurt rather than help people.
The Republicans are completely off the walls. And they're the ones that want to put control back into the hands of private businesses. Like Rheagen pretty much started. So yeah, I do consider it abusive, that's why I'm a Democrat, we as a whole want the government to be used to help people. Unlike the Republicans who believe the government only exists to help them, so when more liberal people are in power they oppose larger government, but when they're in power they champion it.
That's generalizing. And I can name a whole list of examples where you're wrong. Believe or not people go into politics to do good. Whether reluctantly like Harry Truman, because of tradition like FDR, or for a need like Nelson Mandela. It's a governing body not a ruling body. There's a distinct difference due to our system of government. Which is why we elect leaders, and why there are strict limits to what those in the government can do, unlike what Donald Trump thinks. Also, "working together", you do realize that in each branch the people there are continuously working AGAINST one another rather than with one another. It's a division of Democrats and Republicans each working against each others intentions.
George Washington could not see the future. We've seen a one party system in work many times, it's called a dictatorship. The two party system was formed so the populace could choose its leader based on their interests. To quote Winston Churchill-"democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BaselessConclusion In reply to Generalobiwankenobi7 [2016-08-17 02:04:57 +0000 UTC]
"So you really care about some argument I had years ago?"
You apparently haven't changed your mind since you are still willing to defend the position. Don't reply back if you don't want to, won't think of it as a victory or anything like that. People have lives. I get it.
"You can sugarcoat it all you want, in the end you'd be more than satisfied with letting businesses run things instead of legitimate governments."
I'd like to know what I said that suggests that about me. I posted my comments because much of what you are writing comes across as in support of the opposite extreme to businesses running everything. 1984 wasn't a manual. That is largely what I don't like about your comments and that doesn't mean I want Blade Runner to happen.
Maybe this just isn't working out. If you are going to act like I'm supporting an extreme when I say I'm not then I guess I'll just call it quits.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Generalobiwankenobi7 In reply to BaselessConclusion [2016-08-17 04:21:17 +0000 UTC]
Of course not. And yes, personal experience makes me a little extreme when it comes to this particular subject.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SherbertTCat [2013-11-16 02:19:17 +0000 UTC]
I thought you should know that a crank website is using your artwork without permission.
www.birtherreport.com/2013/11/…
I don't agree with the statement your piece makes, but it should be used like this by such despicable people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>