HOME | DD

Scarabsi — APH : Let's Be Practical

Published: 2011-03-14 06:10:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 1679; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description Uh oh.


SO, England and France started tearing each other apart around the late seventeenth century, and eventually they brought it to the American frontier. (However since I was an idiot and drew the two in mid-eighteenth-century uniforms, the moment in this comic is probably anacronistic. Sorry.) Naturally, that means that they call on their colonies for help.

This is an exciting time for the English colonists. They've been fighting a lot of wars now, pretty much against the natives, and they've gotten pretty good at it, too. They know so many tricks of warfare and they've got lots of experience with guns, etc. etc. Who cares if they're militiamen? They're damn good at what they do! And now, they have a chance to show off their warfare skill to their British motherland counterparts!

The problem is, the British officers don't really take the colonial warfare tactics seriously, seeing them as cowardly and barbaric (hiding behind trees and things like that). Likewise, the colonists didn't know what was up with the European custom of meeting up on a big open field to be sitting ducks for each other.

Both tactics are perfectly valid, given their origins. The colonists fight the way they do (known famously in middle-school history as "Guerilla") because they've learned warfare from natives, who use nature to their advantage. Warfare with natives has no respect, no hesitation, just hatred and fear and either you eradicate them or they eradicate you; win or die. The European way, to arrange a meeting in a large open field and opening fire, was developed because of Europe's constant warfare; it's the kind of war that doesn't fight to kill, but fights to determine superiority, in a world where your worst enemy today could possibly be your best friend tomorrow, and battles are a test of skill and brainwork more than anything else, like a game of chess.

Or, if the above paragraph was tl;dr for you: American warfare = brawn. European warfare = brains.

This dissonance between the definition of war from these two groups, who are supposed to be the same nationality serving under the same crown, would have caused enough problems already. However, the problem was aggravated by a refusal from the British officials to ever take colonial advice, even if their ideas would have been more useful (e.g. surprising the Frenchmen) or wiser (e.g. fighting against natives). At least, not until toward the end of the wars.

Finally, the colonists and the mainland-British start to realize: the colonies have grown. They haven't relied on England for a long time, and they've gotten used to taking care of themselves; in fact, they've started to expect to take care of themselves.


It's probably hard to tell because of the colourless shading style, but England's coat is red. xD;; Just something I guess might have been important to know. Colonial America isn't wearing a uniform so much as dressed-up-for-war, but I kitted him out in militia-style clothes.

Of course, as always, if there's something I've gotten wrong, please do not hesitate to correct me. If you want to ramble or rant, I'd be even happier. I'm not here to teach, I'm here to learn!


Characters (c) by the adorkable Hidekaz Himaruya.
I am not making money off this work. Heck, I'm barely making pageviews off this work. So please don't sue me.

P.S. If there's anyone out there reading this who's played Fire Emblem before. . . the way I draw America keeps looking more and more like some other rascally character , doesn't it? @_@;;
Related content
Comments: 19

pokemonaofei [2011-12-23 06:03:58 +0000 UTC]

OMG. YES. YOUR AMERICA LOOKS LIKE.
*points to dp*
BUT. BUT. HIS BROTHER IS THE ONE WITH THE NAME MATTHEW. OOOOO

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scarabsi In reply to pokemonaofei [2011-12-23 08:48:01 +0000 UTC]

Hahahaha I was wondering if anyone was ever going to comment about that. xD HIGH-FIVE FOR THE FELLOW HETALIA AND FIRE EMBLEM FAN!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pokemonaofei In reply to Scarabsi [2011-12-23 11:56:00 +0000 UTC]

*highfives* XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KitakLaw [2011-11-22 13:24:14 +0000 UTC]

lol - I loved that, "Uh...what?" moment at the end. And it's so true, honestly - the Americans, to the best of my knowledge, used very serious guerilla tactics...and threw any Europeans they came up against in a tizzy for it. I'd say that by the end, Arthur was thinking that what Alfred was doing was just plain WRONG. Not just, "not playing by the rules" wrong, but actually MORALLY AND ETHICALLY wrong.

Although...warfare among the Natives was not AS harsh as you're making it seem here. Yes, they had their own separate rules of engagement, but I don't think that it was always "all or nothing" when it came to how the Natives fought either each other or the colonists and Europeans. But even if it was (since I'm really speaking on things I have minimal knowledge about), the British, for all their "rules", were not above using some underhanded tactics of their own...like deliberately sneaking smallpox to the Natives in a parley.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scarabsi In reply to KitakLaw [2011-11-25 10:34:07 +0000 UTC]

Toward the end of the war, some of the more open-minded (and desperate) British officers started employing some colonial tactics, but it was so late in the war that the colonists still felt they weren't being taken seriously. As far as the actual warfare is concerned I don't know much, since all I know is about how it made everyone feel. xD;; The European British were scandalized because it was wrong, and yeah, it was probably because of what you said; in Europe, you don't fight wars to wipe people off the map, because that's horrible!

I probably exaggerated, since of course the natives did cooperate with Europeans and colonists alternately depending on their interests. I kind of wanted to express. . . I'm really bad at articulation. I guess it's like, the respect wasn't there, you know? An Englishman may hate a Frenchman, but he'd still admit that a Frenchman is a fellow human being, even if he'd be kind of sour about it. Natives held their values in completely different things and their societies weren't things Europeans saw as society (for example, they didn't wear as much clothes, and they placed more value in cheap metal pots than in expensive beaver furs). . . Then in addition, they were in constant conflict in an extremely personal way. You're not fighting them because you got a decree from the government telling you you had to bring glory to your nation, you fought them because they killed your dad and you wanted every last one of them to pay for it, right?

I don't even know what I'm saying anymore, I've confused myself. And definitely the way British and Spanish people treated natives sometimes were absolutely horrible. You hear stories about conquistadores (who actually didn't give two shits about Spain and habitually betrayed it/him directly, so it saddens me when I see Spain depicted as one) who are given wonderful hospitality by natives and still decide to massacre and desecrate their civilization for personal greed. There are written records of how beautiful South American civilizations used to be, so amazing that they made Spain look like a mud hole in comparison, so intricate and intelligent that they couldn't even begin to fathom it. . . and they destroyed it anyway. The same people who admired the culture destroyed it for selfish reasons. How anyone could possibly be that horrible is beyond my comprehension.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KitakLaw In reply to Scarabsi [2011-11-25 14:01:17 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I know - but prior to that point, the American guerilla tactics REALLY threw them into a tizzy. And probably further reinforced the British determination to bring the colonies to heel and teach them what was "right".

I think the best example I could think of what I'm trying to say about the Native style of warfare is to look at when they would raid the colonial settlements and forts. There was a LOT of killing involved, yes, and that sent shock waves through the surrounding community, but...they were very careful about who they killed and who they spared. Sometimes it's racially determined (like the attacks on the forts during Pontiac's Rebellion, where the Natives would attack the British and Americans, but leave any French-Canadians they found alone) or something more personal (like one attack on an American settlement where people they knew to have exihibited kindness to them before were spared). But at the same time, the Natives wouldn't chase their defeated opponents off the field, killing them the whole way - not from what I've heard anyway. They knew what their objective was and they were going to stick to it. Also, at least in the Natives' warfare with each other, it was a hard-and-fast rule that your fight was against the other warriors and women and children were off limits. That changed over time, unfortunately, and there are exceptions to every rule, but there you go. Finally, there are a lot of accounts of Native war captives (white or from other tribes) who were tortured by the people back in the villages - but those who survive that ordeal are often fully adopted into the tribe and treated like family. It's one of those things where I can't agree with it wholly but I can't vilify it completely either.

And I know about what happened to the indigenous civilizations in Central and South America. In my head-canon, they had nations to represent them (I based that off the degree of development of a cohesive civilization) and the current countries there are actually their descendents, many of them fathered by Antonio. Yeah...I know it's rather different from what you've said, but there you go.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

YoakeKodomo [2011-08-15 13:57:43 +0000 UTC]

And already the Colonies are becoming 'American.'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scarabsi In reply to YoakeKodomo [2011-08-17 23:05:40 +0000 UTC]

Yup! They've been American for a while now, but they thought they were British. Therefore, INTERNAL CONFUSION! Poor guys.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YoakeKodomo In reply to Scarabsi [2011-08-18 20:02:10 +0000 UTC]

Heh, and now I'm reading a book about early colonies. When I came across the first event of the Americans using Indian tactics in war, I remembered your comic and started giggling. If anyone was around me they would probably be confused. ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scarabsi In reply to YoakeKodomo [2011-08-19 08:26:09 +0000 UTC]

Aww, I think being remembered in an outside context is the best compliment I've ever been given. Thank you! I-I'd try to express how much it warms my heart but it would probably sound creepy to you s-s-so I'll just shut up here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YoakeKodomo In reply to Scarabsi [2011-08-20 01:55:41 +0000 UTC]

Oh not at all! I'm glad that you feel complimented! I strangely like making people happy, so... this is cool with me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scarabsi In reply to YoakeKodomo [2011-08-23 01:57:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katrover [2011-05-18 20:10:15 +0000 UTC]

Dun dun dun ... !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scarabsi In reply to katrover [2011-05-22 20:24:57 +0000 UTC]

England: N-now don't let's be silly. We wouldn't want everyone tripping over the tree roots while looking for the enemies, now would we?
America: You're talking to me like it's the sixteen hundreds again.
England: Exactly it, luv. After the battle I'll make a great fire and you can sit on my lap with a nice cuppa. You love that, don't you?
America: England! Are you listening to me?!
England: Of course you do. That's a good lad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kordi [2011-05-08 10:28:09 +0000 UTC]

Not that I know a damn thing about APH, but this still cracks me up. xD; That's fabulous. For the grayscale hue variants, are there warm and cool grays on there? They don't look as though they're zero-saturation. o.O

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scarabsi In reply to Kordi [2011-05-09 04:58:32 +0000 UTC]

You probably don't need to know much about the actual series beyond "the one on the left is (pre-)USA and the one on the right is England," since this (and the other few comics like it) were based off my Colonial US History class rather than the series. I was trying to build up to a different portrayal of the American Revolution, where America was really more emotionally affected by it than England; I really see it more that way, since most Americans hadn't meant to break away at all and afterwards they had no idea what to do, whereas the British saw it more like the loss of a great resource and a bit of an embarrassing defeat in a war they shouldn't have had any problem winning. I feel bad acting like I know more than other people because I don't, but it seems like too many Hetalia fans are under the impression that the war was a well-deserved comeuppance of British oppressors by the super amazing underdog America, and that smells too much of American propaganda to me. It doesn't seem realistic. [/ramble][/too much talking]

Haha, I'm amazed you can tell! These were shaded in with a set of greyscale shading markers and then scanned in colour. There are different kinds of greys in there, though that's about the extent of it I understand (colours + me = fail). xD It probably doesn't make much difference except to me, but I kind of like the effect of coloured greys, yeah?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kordi In reply to Scarabsi [2011-05-10 06:57:31 +0000 UTC]

Haha, didn't think so. <3
That makes sense. ouo~

Crayola or Laurentien, I don't remember which, has a cool gray and a smoke gray, and I remember favoring cool gray/getting mad if I used smoke gray by accident. 83; The different grays do have a nice effect. <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dimentia44 [2011-03-14 12:12:23 +0000 UTC]

I am... REALLY impressed that I can still figure out that England's coat is red in only gray coloring...skill, dude!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scarabsi In reply to Dimentia44 [2011-03-16 05:53:57 +0000 UTC]

xD *thumbs up!* Good job! You get a gold star. I was actually kind of worried that it wouldn't look red, because. . . it's red, man! xD;; Now I understand why lots of greyscale artists make exceptions for red.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0