HOME | DD

scotskunk β€” How Milena Escapes?

Published: 2016-08-22 06:07:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 10455; Favourites: 86; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description art by

So, one of the things that I get noted about is Milena's times getting captured. A good lot of people still question as to how a near immortal vampire can keep of getting bound up so often. The true answer is she can escape as many times as she wants, ready for the next time she's going to get bound up.

However, certain messagers kept coming forward trying to put forward how she actually does it, one was the idea that Milena tricks a guard watching her that she's actually Scot, and the Milena switched places with him, so to get an easy escape.

Fair to say, this idea was too good not to try and show.

The wildcards owned by
Related content
Comments: 9

fantasylancer [2016-08-22 13:43:12 +0000 UTC]

lol.....I didn't know she could shapeshift

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shadey83 [2016-08-22 13:01:19 +0000 UTC]

some day her captors may learn, eventually after time even the slow ones may learnΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hypercat-Z In reply to Shadey83 [2017-09-16 09:09:42 +0000 UTC]

Good guys never learn and keep skipping the death sentence option because they have to show off they are the "good guys". And also because so the authors can use the same villains over and over.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadey83 In reply to Hypercat-Z [2017-09-16 14:31:45 +0000 UTC]

all truth, i prefer a non-death to many character in art/comics to be captured and return some other time later, hell in original batman comics the joker died.... i guess they rectified that mistake later on in other iterationsΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

betterwatchit [2016-08-22 10:08:18 +0000 UTC]

This begs the question: What would happen if Scot found incontrovertible proof that he's Milena's host?The sort that would leave him no choice but to say "I'm the host of a vampire!"?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scotskunk In reply to betterwatchit [2016-08-22 11:15:48 +0000 UTC]

See that's probably a question too far right now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

betterwatchit In reply to scotskunk [2016-08-22 11:55:19 +0000 UTC]

Sorry.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

metalzaki [2016-08-22 07:28:25 +0000 UTC]

this explanes so much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LumiTheNexyrianHedge [2016-08-22 06:10:27 +0000 UTC]

oooh

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0