HOME | DD

Scutigera — Rotifer sketches 1 - Colleen

Published: 2011-07-29 23:16:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 3051; Favourites: 44; Downloads: 244
Redirect to original
Description I really like rotifers, but they are among the most severely underappreciated and obscure members of the animal kingdom. After years of jokingly claiming that everything needs more rotifers, I caved in and finally decided to practice what I preach. That is, I filled a vacant niche by making some original characters based on rotifers--and teaching myself how to draw these transparent, microscopic animals in the process.

Rotifers have astonishing morphological diversity: some are slender and leech-like, some are shelled and flat, some are vast and oblong, some are protected by sharp spines, some have locomotory appendages such as paddles or setae or lobopods, and the list goes on. I couldn't possibly represent all of Phylum Rotifera with just one character. Thus, I made a quartet of rotifers, each with a different combination of species- or genus-specific features. There is still so much rotifer diversity left over that I might design more such rotifer hybrids, though their roles as characters would most likely be peripheral.

The rotifer depicted in this first set of illustrations is Colleen. She is basically a Collotheca mutabilis minus the mucous cocoon and with the feather-like paddles of Polyarthra spp. Colleen's name is an Anglicization of the first syllable of Collotheca. I came up with the names for the other rotifer characters (Connie, Tessie, and Steph) in the same way.

Collotheca mutabilis is my favorite rotifer. I think it is the most visually accessible and relatable rotifer for a human audience, because it bears a whimsical, almost cartoony resemblance to a sock puppet. Collotheca rotifers are ambush predators: rather than generating a current and filter feeding, one of these rotifers waits around with its mouth-like infundibulum hanging open. When a small organism blunders into its infundibulum, it snaps shut like a venus fly trap. And much as a venus fly trap has spiky "teeth," the infundibulum is tipped with numerous long, coarse setae. There is an excellent photo of what a real Collotheca mutabilis looks like, approximately 2/5 of the way down on this microscopy page .
Related content
Comments: 23

ColormeAustism00 [2024-09-30 02:34:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cjopbj [2014-11-20 21:51:48 +0000 UTC]

They are amazing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

joffeorama [2012-01-28 20:03:49 +0000 UTC]

these things are pretty great, now I have a new wikipedia hole to crawl into

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SineSquared [2011-09-08 23:52:43 +0000 UTC]

Squeeeee!! They are ADORABLE! It's like.. Rotifer fan art!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scutigera In reply to SineSquared [2011-09-15 00:31:57 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you like them! Personally, I think of "fan art" as applying to fictional characters and creatures--someone else's intellectual property--rather than real-life animals.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

That-One-Ninja [2011-08-04 22:55:13 +0000 UTC]

I've loved all your character designs so far, and this is no exception. It really gets my cfreative juices flowing to see such well designed non-humanoid characters.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scutigera In reply to That-One-Ninja [2011-08-05 22:15:31 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad that my character designs inspire you. I perceive that there is a general scarcity of characters who are non-humanoid. Even a lot of animal-based characters still have human physical characteristics like bipedal stance, human-like hands, human breasts, human clothing, human hair, human hips, human-like feet, long straight human legs, human shoulders, human necks, human lips, human chins, human eyelids, human eyebrows, human endoskeletons, human internal organs... Wow, I've typed "human" so many times that the word is now starting to look weird and meaningless to me. But anyway, in my recent character designs I have tried to avoid physical anthropomorphism as much as possible. My newer characters in general still have human-level intelligence and are able to communicate complex ideas and experience nuanced emotions, and most are able to make vaguely-human-like gestures or contort their eyes into facial expressions. However, I intend for them to bear no more anatomical resemblance to a human than does--for example--a real-life armadillo or assembly-line robot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Russockshitha [2011-08-02 22:38:24 +0000 UTC]

Yay for rotifers! She turned out really nice. I eagerly await your next set of sketches.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scutigera In reply to Russockshitha [2011-08-05 21:59:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I'm not sure when the next set of sketches will be done, as I am currently distracted by another artistic pursuit: rendering my rotifer quartet as 3D models in Sculptris. I will eventually upload screenshots of those models too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russockshitha In reply to Scutigera [2011-08-14 20:04:19 +0000 UTC]

That will be cool to see.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

scythemantis [2011-08-02 03:49:56 +0000 UTC]

Rotifers really are some of the world's most underrepresented animals, you drew this really beautifully and I didn't know a thing about all this anatomy either : o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scutigera In reply to scythemantis [2011-08-05 21:57:52 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I still have much to learn about their anatomy, myself. Like what the three-dimensional structure of the trophi looks like. It's rather hard to figure that out from two-dimensional sketches that are nearly all drawn from the same angle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mesklinite01 [2011-07-31 12:15:33 +0000 UTC]

AAAA I had no idea they could be this cute!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scutigera In reply to Mesklinite01 [2011-07-31 19:44:36 +0000 UTC]

Until I started browsing their diversity for every species I could find, I didn't know how cute rotifers could be either.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PousazPower [2011-07-31 05:51:25 +0000 UTC]

Is Steph a Stephanoceros?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scutigera In reply to PousazPower [2011-07-31 19:46:47 +0000 UTC]

Yes!!! Or rather, she has the head region of Stephanoceros. The rest of her is a mix of Philodina and Hexarthra. I am excited that you figured it out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PousazPower In reply to Scutigera [2011-08-01 16:46:57 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, that was the only rotifer name I knew off the top of my head that would fit.
So do the names just come from the head structures, or are they arbitrary?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scutigera In reply to PousazPower [2011-08-01 22:17:12 +0000 UTC]

They're somewhat arbitrary. I consider each rotifer genus incorporated into each character, and choose the name based on whichever genus can be converted to an Anglicized name that sounds decent and is feminine or gender-neutral. In this case, a name derived from "Stephanoceros" was really obvious, whereas I couldn't think of many names derived from "Hexarthra" or "Philodina." I guess there's "Phillis," but "Steph" sounds better to me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

revereche [2011-07-30 00:01:38 +0000 UTC]

Rotifers <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scutigera In reply to revereche [2011-07-31 03:00:32 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes, rotifers. There will be more rotifer sketches to come.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MorticianOfTheOracle [2011-07-29 23:23:52 +0000 UTC]

Wow! : D Those are amazing!
And I couldn't agree with you more, rotifers most certainly are under-appreciated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scutigera In reply to MorticianOfTheOracle [2011-07-31 03:01:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I tend to gravitate toward under-appreciated animals. The more under-appreciated, the better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MorticianOfTheOracle In reply to Scutigera [2011-07-31 20:52:40 +0000 UTC]

Agreed.
Like this one:
XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0