HOME | DD

sed4tive — 000

Published: 2011-11-28 08:13:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 515; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 13
Redirect to original
Description Moon, Jupiter and four of Jupiter's 63 moons.

Canon EOS 500D
* 300mm
* f/9
* 1/320 - 1 sec
* ISO 100
- tripod
Related content
Comments: 17

WerdGhana [2013-04-05 15:29:28 +0000 UTC]

nice..i was wonder how u get Moon like that and Jupiter with Moons.. ..now i knwo .. alot times i just watching Jupiter..not taking shots and watching..i thing i remember this moment .. lol ..i want take time lapse of Jupiter and Moons ..it can take long time ( few mounts ) but clouds killing this thought ..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sed4tive In reply to WerdGhana [2013-04-05 17:01:21 +0000 UTC]

I took two different photos; exposure for moon was 1/320 sec and Jupiter 1 sec.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WerdGhana In reply to sed4tive [2013-04-06 13:28:01 +0000 UTC]

ok THX .. will be cool to have even small telescope like 1000mm what is not very expensive..best is buy telescope where no one clean mirror in side..sometimes its better left is little dusty than clean it .. with small 1000mm moon looks so `Dark` and Frozen by cosmos..in time i can give you few infos about soem coool Cosmic Events coming..but i thing u know them all allready

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sagarpuro [2012-01-08 08:33:05 +0000 UTC]

awesome..i got jupiter and its 3 moons recently...but ur pic has moon in it too and it looks way awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sed4tive In reply to sagarpuro [2012-01-08 12:19:44 +0000 UTC]

Yeps, they were in conjunction, so it was possible to immortalize them together. Yet I had to take two separate photos with different values of shutter speed, as the moon didn't need as much light than Jupiter did. In the end I merged them together in Photoshop and the outcome is this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sagarpuro In reply to sed4tive [2012-01-08 17:37:00 +0000 UTC]

oh...nice thinking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Black-Richa [2011-12-06 02:11:45 +0000 UTC]

What's the big one called?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sed4tive In reply to Black-Richa [2011-12-06 11:26:10 +0000 UTC]

Oh, there are our Moon (the biggest one of course), then comes Jupiter (that second biggest spot) and the last ones are Jupiter's most known moons in order: Io, Europa, Callisto and Ganymede. They're not visible to your eyes, but you need a zoom objective (I have 300mm) or a telescope (which I'd love to have).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Black-Richa In reply to sed4tive [2011-12-12 06:53:38 +0000 UTC]

Well yeah, I meant the spots
Jupiter huh? Nice I'd love to have a telescope too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

M-Ryan28 In reply to Black-Richa [2011-12-14 21:14:06 +0000 UTC]

Just go out search for bright star under Moon, it's Jupiter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Black-Richa In reply to M-Ryan28 [2011-12-18 06:21:36 +0000 UTC]

I see
but I probably can't see it due the light pollution where I live (I'll keep it mind though for the next time I go somewhere else though )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

M-Ryan28 In reply to Black-Richa [2011-12-18 11:52:03 +0000 UTC]

Even in 50mm trieder you can see it's 4 brightest moons. They are changing positions every night in 4 cycles (the same position after 4 nights).
In 80mm trieder or telescope you'll catch up more and more details on planet's surface

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Black-Richa In reply to M-Ryan28 [2011-12-23 02:58:02 +0000 UTC]

But...I don't have a telescope

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

M-Ryan28 In reply to Black-Richa [2011-12-23 23:26:51 +0000 UTC]

Heh, you can still wrtie to Jesus ...or Santa..
Trieder = binoculars, you should have it at home Don't worry, even without binoculars you can watch their positions by making photo of them 4days in a row.

If you want to see some details of Jupiter by camera (lens must have focal lenght 200mm and more), take faster expositions, lowest ISO, to take down brightness. You know what I mean, the same as with Moon. After that, go to photoshop and try finding any details with adding contrast/sharpen or just playing with the photo .
--Of course if you have a superzoom camera or DSLR with telephoto lens.

Merry Christmass btw.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Black-Richa In reply to M-Ryan28 [2011-12-27 05:10:45 +0000 UTC]

Or my birthday
Well I do have binoculars, and that's just about it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IckleVoldiePoo [2011-11-28 21:44:53 +0000 UTC]

Awesome! Did you take that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sed4tive In reply to IckleVoldiePoo [2011-11-29 12:23:00 +0000 UTC]

Yep

👍: 0 ⏩: 0