HOME | DD

shamanger β€” it is all so depressing..

Published: 2011-06-23 09:41:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 1692; Favourites: 47; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description if you ever browsed the newest section of deviantART (especially the anthro section) twice a day, you'll know what I'm talking about..

seriously, what is wrong with people?
is inflation and grotesquely disproportionate breasts supposed to be normal?
Related content
Comments: 40

Max-Rei [2013-04-25 11:34:28 +0000 UTC]

lol would be me though lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

20-06 [2013-04-10 22:31:48 +0000 UTC]

"Anthro"
Nice hypocrisy
lollol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to 20-06 [2013-04-10 23:06:18 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure you're one to judge. /endsarcasm
like I care what someone like you has to think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

20-06 In reply to shamanger [2013-04-11 01:25:15 +0000 UTC]

Then don't be a pussy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SeventhDeven [2012-12-10 04:28:37 +0000 UTC]

Also note the different cultures out there that don't see breasts as... You know. My dad has traveled world-wide.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

playerpichu [2012-04-17 06:27:55 +0000 UTC]

Exactly, and why do people keep drawing Boobs on Gardivor and its pre evos.? THEY. DON'T. NEED. THEM. XP

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to playerpichu [2012-04-17 13:38:46 +0000 UTC]

it could be worse.
boobs can be kinda fitting on pokes like Garde (within a limit), 'cause they look like ghostly ball dancers.
I agree with you on boobs not going on Kirlia (and DEFINITELY not on Ralts), they're too small and underage looking to have boobs.
what I really don't like is people putting boobs on pokes that shouldn't even have boobs, like Blaziken and Serperior.
some people seem to forget boobs, ie -mammary- glands, only belong on -mammals-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

playerpichu In reply to shamanger [2012-04-18 07:52:07 +0000 UTC]

I totally agree ;W; putting Boobs on unnecessary things is childish and immature I will except it on things that look like they need it, as LONG as they don't over exaggerate An example would be Kangaskan

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

F0XBLAZE [2012-04-17 01:35:30 +0000 UTC]

I still don't understand people's obsession with drawing pokemon insanely fat or even Pokemon porn. That's just sick! Especially since kids want to look up pokemon pictures sometimes! Google needs to have like a filter or something.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to F0XBLAZE [2012-04-17 13:47:14 +0000 UTC]

I think google is still working out better ways of filtering out porn in google images.
it's hard for a computer to be able to know what's in a picture, and even harder for it to know the context the picture is posted in outside of a list of fairly obvious keywords relating to pornography.
people draw just about everything with their sick-minded inflation, lactation, fat-tation fetishes. people on the internet are just retarded like that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

F0XBLAZE In reply to shamanger [2012-04-17 16:31:39 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, but that's where artist responsibility should apply. There should be like a category thing where you're required to put a category, so they would put it as 'Porn' so if people don't want to see it, they can block pictures in that category from showing up.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to F0XBLAZE [2012-04-17 17:47:58 +0000 UTC]

I don't think that's a good idea.
catagorising submissions by fetish is something they do in FurAffinity.net
doing that would just send the wrong messages to everybody in the dA community.
it would encourage the fetishistic people to keep submitting the same stuff, and drive the clean artists away.
I mean, just look at FurAffinity (don't -really- look at it if you can help it). it's a cesspool for all the stuff we can't tolerate here in dA. almost -all- the adds on that site are for porn comissions, or just adult stuff in general.
dA needs to have standards, so it can't do more than give artists the option of adding a mature tag to their submissions.
softcore porn is the only loophole.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

F0XBLAZE In reply to shamanger [2012-04-17 18:47:19 +0000 UTC]

Hmm.. that's a good point. I just hate when I'm trying to look up pokemon pictures for references, and I come across one that looks well detailed and not suspicious, then I notice... extra's. I pray that those pictures haven't scarred a kid for life, or got them into looking up porn before they're ready and just completely corrupting them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pikachuvirus1996 [2011-11-07 01:28:54 +0000 UTC]

i have to take a look at that cause i havent done that before... oh btw PIKACHU!!!!!!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to Pikachuvirus1996 [2011-11-07 05:22:05 +0000 UTC]

sure.. knock yourself out.
probably wont be much fun though ^_^;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wherewolfe [2011-06-27 02:34:34 +0000 UTC]

Lol so true. More upsetting to me is the complete lack of talent on the part of their creator. And ignore the individuals who immediately flip shit on things like this that express even the slightest disapproval of something they have no problem with. They aren't worth the time it would take to shit on them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to wherewolfe [2011-06-29 08:09:47 +0000 UTC]

sometimes it's hard to tell what's more of an eyesore; the images portrayed, or the sheer amount of completely untalented portrayals..

I posted an anthro piece a while ago that would've topped at least half of the anthro newest section, .. didn't even get a single fave or comment.
.. I suspect the anthro section may be nepotistic or something..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hiholo [2011-06-26 08:34:22 +0000 UTC]

I love how somebody who enjoys anthropomorphic sex roleplay with fictional cartoon creatures is using the line "seriously, what is wrong with people?"
Don't judge unless you've got a clean slate, buddy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to hiholo [2011-06-26 08:53:56 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry, I don't follow.
I think you are being very presumptuous in accusing me of such things.
I'll have you know that I do not partake in sexual roleplay at all.

don't judge someone until you know their story, buddy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PikachuRXZ [2011-06-25 03:36:08 +0000 UTC]

HEY thats how i was earlier

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to PikachuRXZ [2011-06-25 05:28:02 +0000 UTC]

^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jackisdown [2011-06-24 02:35:29 +0000 UTC]

Define "normal" No one is ever saying that it's normal.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to Jackisdown [2011-06-24 03:36:02 +0000 UTC]

normal: healthy (not ill or unwell), something that fits the norm, that fits in with mainstream society.

nobody has to state explicity that it is normal or not
if a lot of seperate people post a lot of one particular thing, it is like those people collectively try to pass it off as normal.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SoftSeal [2011-06-23 14:46:36 +0000 UTC]

Is it ok, since I am one that is cursed to the interest of it all, to explain my best? I can't really say how it every got started or how people like it at all. It isn't a choice really as much as something you're forced to be. It's a.... type of sexuality. I know that comes controversial to many people, but it is true, for that's what they're created for.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to SoftSeal [2011-06-24 04:20:43 +0000 UTC]

so it is a fetish!

lol just kiddin'
thanks for trying to explain it to me.
it seems I can't ever understand people's sex drives, let alone the drives of sexual deviants. .. I guess I'm asexual or some'n'.
sometimes I wonder if I am weird for not seeing sexual interest like everyoe else does, or if being the way I am let's me see how corrupive sexual interest is.

.. since I don't have any of the answers, I really can't judge anyone on what they're into, even if I disagree with it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SoftSeal In reply to shamanger [2011-06-24 04:26:47 +0000 UTC]

Ugh. What I'd do to understand it all as well. -3- I'm sad to say, but from what I know of the fandom as it is, it is somewhat mostly based off of sexual perspective. Maybe it was just formed when we were kids and grew from that, but you could still be in it and not have a sexuality. There are people who support it, or just somewhat feel comfort in it I guess. ^^ Also, I've always believed it wasn't exactaly the sexuality's fault for existing (unless it's down right hurtful), but more of society and how they view us. I hope this helped a bit more. o;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to SoftSeal [2011-06-24 06:36:02 +0000 UTC]

.. wait, now I'm confused. ^_^;
are we talking about inflation fandom, orrr .. the furry fandom?
when you say 'the fandom' I instantly thought of furries. ^_^;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SoftSeal In reply to shamanger [2011-06-24 10:29:25 +0000 UTC]

The whole furry fandom. I'm sorry for not being specific enough.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OkidokiCharlie [2011-06-23 10:51:35 +0000 UTC]

What's so wrong with anthro and inflation?
I'm just asking because I don't get it...

But I love the expression on pikachu's face, though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to OkidokiCharlie [2011-06-23 11:35:02 +0000 UTC]

I didn't say there was anything wrong with anthro, it just seems like a few of the artists in the newest section are trying to make the fandom look bad..
I seriously do not see the appeal of inflation at all, yet so many people in dA seem to be drawing it..
it has a shallow vibe about it that would lead some people to assume it's fetishy..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OkidokiCharlie In reply to shamanger [2011-06-23 12:08:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the good explanation.
You've got me to think in a better way.
I'm unfortunately one of those who kinda loves both anthro, inflation and big busts,
but hav'nt thinked of it in that perspective.

I must give you a big thanks for your interesting thought.
This helps me to become a better person/artist.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to OkidokiCharlie [2011-06-23 12:25:24 +0000 UTC]

really? because I don't feel like I explained an awful lot.
.. but if you say so, thanks. ^_^;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OkidokiCharlie In reply to shamanger [2011-06-23 12:46:26 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ashayx [2011-06-23 10:51:09 +0000 UTC]

seems like people canΒ΄t draw anthros without big breasts...
sad but true
I know people are free to draw whatever they want but especially the anthro section is getting more and more sexual

oh and pikachuΒ΄s face is priceless :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to Ashayx [2011-06-23 11:46:59 +0000 UTC]

it's not just in the anthro section .. it's everywhere. :I

whenever I see a see a character drawn with beachballs for boobs, I instantly think of the pain and discomfort a living person would feel if they had that much dead weight hanging from their rib cages.
.. that and how unrealisticly they are drawn at that size. .. adipose tissue is too heavy to be perfectly round once it goes past the size of a cantaloupe, even with connective tissue supporting it..

(thanks for your comment, by the way)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ashayx In reply to shamanger [2011-06-23 16:36:31 +0000 UTC]

yeah your right...itΒ΄s the same with the porn section...
everything that exists has a porn site of itself...>.>
and sometimes soem people on dA donΒ΄t put a mature content filter on it or upload it even if itΒ΄s against the rules

and about the beachball size...stars in real life died because of this
there you can see how unrealistic the whole thing is

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to Ashayx [2011-06-24 04:26:42 +0000 UTC]

I guess there are always people who can't appreciate natural limits and take things to the extreme..
like people who take steroids or get breast implants.

I almost feel sorry for them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ashayx In reply to shamanger [2011-06-24 10:18:14 +0000 UTC]

some people get breast implants because they canΒ΄t handle the mental influence of flat breasts...and some even let them make smaller because they have huge problems because of the weight...

ah well crazy and sad world we live in

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

l3lue-Kat [2011-06-23 09:45:16 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha Love his face!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shamanger In reply to l3lue-Kat [2011-06-23 09:48:16 +0000 UTC]

thanks ^_^

I tried to draw Pikachu's expression exactly like the expression I had at the time. ^_^;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0