HOME | DD

shepherd0821 — Do some reading!

Published: 2013-12-25 22:25:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 51522; Favourites: 1024; Downloads: 492
Redirect to original
Description Thanks for Translation by and TNBi, adjust by .
Related content
Comments: 136

Inksketchers [2015-12-19 06:43:17 +0000 UTC]

Flowers for algernon was awesome btw

šŸ‘: 1 ā©: 0

RCFlashFreak [2015-10-09 19:11:08 +0000 UTC]

so thats how M.A Larson does it!
=w=

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

elpachonisimo [2015-08-28 23:49:16 +0000 UTC]

Suele pasar jajajaja

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

spudman98 [2015-07-08 01:04:05 +0000 UTC]

My guess on the worst books shelf includes the the works of Stephanie Myers and E.L. James

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

TXFCALIBRE [2015-02-14 16:44:42 +0000 UTC]

Pinkie Logic!!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

MetalixK [2015-02-08 09:11:20 +0000 UTC]

To be fair, as good as Flowers for Algernon was, that thing was WAY too depressing to warrant a second read.

šŸ‘: 1 ā©: 1

Touch-Not-This-Cat In reply to MetalixK [2021-11-28 07:19:49 +0000 UTC]

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

gumballcariedarwin [2015-01-30 22:51:03 +0000 UTC]

I agree with Pinkie. I do love me some terrible book.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Zorbonaut [2015-01-30 21:04:24 +0000 UTC]

Bile fascination.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

RainbowRocks02 [2014-12-31 12:09:35 +0000 UTC]

Pinkie is a genius

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

penawii [2014-12-30 08:03:19 +0000 UTC]

They borrowed four of the "Top 10 Great Books", so it can't be that bad

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

WesternOfKyushu [2014-07-23 06:17:04 +0000 UTC]

Na-Na-Na-Na-Negativity!

"Everybody's a critic."

Today in Terrible Book Club, we're doing "Mystery Science Theater 3000," the book of the movie of the book which is also terrible.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

HugoMndz In reply to WesternOfKyushu [2014-12-30 17:30:58 +0000 UTC]

I'd read that

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

roflnagi15 [2014-07-11 22:43:51 +0000 UTC]

wait what...
why?!
HOW?!
well guess pinkie got a sense for good ideas that sound terrible but are actually pretty good
still wondering who took those books

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Ragnarok834 In reply to roflnagi15 [2014-08-16 19:58:14 +0000 UTC]

if twilight think a book is bad, that book is good: that's the meaning

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

WhiteLynx57 [2014-07-03 07:36:05 +0000 UTC]

More reverse psychology!!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

PyramidHead90 In reply to WhiteLynx57 [2014-10-16 05:31:18 +0000 UTC]

Not really.Ā  If the success of things like Rifftrax or half the shows on TruTV didn't tip you off, people tend to like looking at metaphorical (and literal in some cases) train wrecks so long as they're a safe distance away or something is numbing the more unbearable effects.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

WhiteLynx57 In reply to PyramidHead90 [2014-10-16 10:24:08 +0000 UTC]

...Whoa...

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

ZetaRESP In reply to WhiteLynx57 [2017-04-15 16:41:37 +0000 UTC]

Basically, mankind finds joy in the fails of others. That's why MST3K got his fame: They take the worst films ever, like "Manos: The Hands of Fate" and they poke fun at it. Rifftrax was made by the same people, but focusing in popular movies. That's how the Nostalgia Critic and Linkara from "Atop the Fourth Wall" get their fame, as well as the Angry Video Game Nerd and various others.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

SparkTheDog [2014-06-01 16:12:04 +0000 UTC]

May I recommend Twilight? All of them?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

MetalixK In reply to SparkTheDog [2014-06-05 21:09:12 +0000 UTC]

I'd recommend 50 Shades of Grey, but I think that would be a bit too much in terms of bad books.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Scourge-the-Unholy In reply to MetalixK [2015-01-20 14:47:09 +0000 UTC]

It's Fifty Neighs of Hay, get it right. XD

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

BoriStonecutter [2014-05-04 23:08:51 +0000 UTC]

*sees title*
ĻƒĻ‰Ļƒ
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlKL_E…

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

NinjaHeart [2014-05-04 19:15:25 +0000 UTC]

Because humans (and ponies) thrive on negativity.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Raefon90 [2014-02-16 09:17:11 +0000 UTC]

twilight just got owned by pinkie pie...so hilarious keep up the awesome work

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Persona22 [2014-01-27 21:03:30 +0000 UTC]

Pinkie is brilliant as usual...

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Turbotowns2 [2014-01-27 03:50:53 +0000 UTC]

Ah Pinkie Pie, more and more evidence of why I love you... <3

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

TheHowlingStorm [2014-01-25 16:59:01 +0000 UTC]

Well... they gotta know why they're terrible in the first place

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

DRAGSLICKS [2014-01-20 16:47:32 +0000 UTC]

That's because she placed them on the top shelf.
Now what if they switch the books around and claim that the good books are terrible and conversely.
Where's your experimental spirit?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

DarthTallis [2014-01-20 02:03:24 +0000 UTC]

I can't argue with Pinkie after seeing how well Stephanie Meyer's Twilight books have gone.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Happybunns [2014-01-17 06:12:05 +0000 UTC]

What else are you going to read to your friends while drunk?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

gameguy199 [2014-01-11 02:21:33 +0000 UTC]

DO NOT QUESTION PINKIE PIE!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Tehwatever [2014-01-05 01:35:07 +0000 UTC]

schmuck bait, hoo ha ha!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Fist-of-doom [2014-01-02 03:39:11 +0000 UTC]

"Tell someone there are over a million stars in the sky any people will believe you, tell someone that the paint is still wet and they'll want to touch it to make sure." Same rules apply to this. You tell them these books are terrible and they'll want to look at them.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

enamorado16 In reply to Fist-of-doom [2014-01-17 08:34:35 +0000 UTC]

100% true, they'll read those books to confirm why are so terrible XD

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

QuantumBranching [2014-01-01 05:36:28 +0000 UTC]

It certainly would spark one's curiosity: I mean, everyone has seen Great Books lists, but Worst Books Ever are rarely discussed. [1]


[1] Of course, "worst" may have different meanings: Mein Kampf or the Turner Diaries are a different sort of "bad" than, say, Norman's "Gor" books or the 10000th iteration of the "Aging college professor and his penis problems" novel...

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SchwarzerRitter In reply to QuantumBranching [2014-01-10 13:09:23 +0000 UTC]

The most discussed book of the last years is Twilight...

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Kyoshyu [2013-12-31 18:58:59 +0000 UTC]

Bahahaha!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

midnightterror1 [2013-12-30 04:57:39 +0000 UTC]

to be honest id go for one of the terrible ones XDĀ 

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

MalphLink [2013-12-30 00:02:51 +0000 UTC]

Logic level, cupcake

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

AlexanderEricson [2013-12-29 02:38:49 +0000 UTC]

Flowers... For... Algernon?
WAAAAAHHH!
Oh, god, the feels...

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

joseph918273 [2013-12-28 20:07:00 +0000 UTC]

You can just feel how she had enough of Pinkie's shit.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

ShadowWK In reply to joseph918273 [2014-01-08 17:17:42 +0000 UTC]

They've ALL had enough of Pinkie's shit. She's that one friend you keep around because dammit, someone needs to be comic relief.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

joseph918273 In reply to ShadowWK [2014-01-16 05:46:02 +0000 UTC]

But I like Pinkie. :c

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

ShadowWK In reply to joseph918273 [2014-02-22 23:44:07 +0000 UTC]

Never said I didn't. But there is only so much random one can take before it gets out of hand.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

rfvcxawspolk [2013-12-28 12:54:01 +0000 UTC]

Reverse psychology!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Shadow-Sword212 [2013-12-28 07:05:06 +0000 UTC]

Lulz

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Zapper0113 [2013-12-28 06:45:34 +0000 UTC]

People would want to know why it would be so terrible which is why they would check it out.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

kitty-chaos [2013-12-27 22:21:37 +0000 UTC]

Well, considering all the terrible books that are selling like crazy these days, I...just can't fault Pinkie's logic.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

caballero-nocturno [2013-12-27 11:53:57 +0000 UTC]

LOL!!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0


| Next =>