HOME | DD

SirJerryLone In reply to RATCHAN [2007-08-15 07:15:31 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, but actually they are *deviation* views. Pageviews are barely 2,500. What makes me particularly happy is that, on average, I have 4 dev views over a pageview. It means that deviants open the gallery and go into the pics, not simply browse pages, and that's what I care.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RATCHAN In reply to SirJerryLone [2007-08-15 22:18:47 +0000 UTC]

I think the same, too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SirJerryLone In reply to pokemoncaptor [2007-08-14 21:45:45 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SirJerryLone In reply to loraxxx [2007-08-14 21:45:32 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes, she's indeed, much more advanced and realistic than PT Vicky but... but... with a f####n' geometry failure in leg bending: after a certain degree the thigh becomes flat!!!
That prevented me from using her in my stories as, you know, body flexibility is essential in our kind of plots. Now I'm starting using her, but only in limited and well-defined settings. What a pity!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loraxxx In reply to SirJerryLone [2007-08-15 03:02:31 +0000 UTC]

what figure is that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SirJerryLone In reply to loraxxx [2007-08-15 07:10:01 +0000 UTC]

Laura 3, that comes with her "brother" Luke 3 (they're both in the picture) along with Vicky 3. All the three models suffer from the same desease, and it's quite serious.

I wrote to DAZ Forum, since I thought it was *impossible* that such a serious problem hadn't been resolved. I guessed how it was possible that people used Vicky-Laura-Luke 3 (don't know about Mike 3) with such a big and apparent defect. Well, the solution was... Vicky 4!!! Oh, pleased about it, about "DAZ innovation" and bla bla bla, but Vicky come out alone. As a matter of fact, the only young charachter from DAZ perfectly working is PT Vicky, issued more than seven years ago!!!

What's worst, with version 1.3.1 of DAZ Studio (the one I'm using) I can't even use Vicky 4. So, as long as I'll have finished the second part of Videogames Troubles, I'll update to ver. 1.7.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loraxxx In reply to SirJerryLone [2007-08-15 09:50:50 +0000 UTC]

i worked around that defect for years--i'm not overly fond of it, but i was able to do some good work despite it, and most people don't notice...

i know it does bother some people, but i chose not to be one of them--i'm really not trying that hard to perfectly recreate reality in my work, anyway...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SirJerryLone In reply to DrFatso [2007-08-14 15:55:31 +0000 UTC]

Let me find out: degree in feminine psichology, uh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0