HOME | DD
SIVKOFF β Revolution
Published: 2005-08-17 10:07:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 3866; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 133
Redirect to original
Description
RevolutionRelated content
Comments: 24
His Face does not mean what you think it means [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
This monkey-face will never disappear. A shame.
π: 0 β©: 0
all these people who praise che guevara i would like to ask where did u get those shirts of him sorry but by doing that you go against his ideal
π: 0 β©: 0
che was a murder he hated ppl and ppl hated him hes not a revulotion good job at making that but he sux
π: 0 β©: 1
Ummm, since Che is popular, doesn't that disprove your claim that "ppl hated him"?
π: 0 β©: 1
hes only popular with all of yall idiots everyone els hes not
π: 0 β©: 1
lol right. When he left a country, he left it with dead bodys and burned fields behind.
π: 0 β©: 0
Is that a stencil? freakin AWESOME yo! He is my idol.
π: 0 β©: 0
You do realise that he was a murderer, right?
π: 0 β©: 2
You can only say that Che was a murderer if you also believe that every other military commander in history was a murderer.
π: 0 β©: 1
Exactly. Any violent action that is not in direct immediate self-defence of an aggressive action is immoral. This means murder, rape, and theft are wrong, and to resist these things is moral. That's the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP).
π: 0 β©: 1
Your notion of morality cannot stand by itself. It depends entirely on who owns what.
Let me give you an example. Suppose John points a gun at Smith and says "give me the keys to that car." Is this an aggressive action, or is it "direct immediate self-defence"? Well, it depends on who owns the car! If Smith owns the car, the action is aggressive. If John owns the car, the action is defensive.
THE EXACT SAME ACTION can be either aggressive or defensive - either moral or immoral - depending on who owns what. So there is a gaping hole in your moral system. Who owns what? Or, to be more exact, who is the RIGHTFUL owner of what?
If I don't believe that the capitalists are the rightful owners of the means of production, then I can argue that violence against the capitalists is self-defence - and therefore moral.
π: 0 β©: 0
thank u some one that doesint idiol the guy
π: 0 β©: 0
ah well done ...........and gud work,
salute che
π: 0 β©: 0
Wow, beautifully drawn, and I absolutely love the lettering.
Very accurate, as well.
Hasta la victoria siempre!
π: 0 β©: 0
Hasta la victoria siempre!!!! Nice drawing.
π: 0 β©: 0
I have Che on my bag, I have Che on my note book and now I have Che in my favourites! No, no, I'm not a fan ^___^
Very beautiful drawing, really.
Or should I say: Π½Ρ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π±Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΊ!
π: 0 β©: 1
Then you know what he did?
π: 0 β©: 0
Wonderful drawing of Che. I love the contrasts and form.
π: 0 β©: 0