HOME | DD
Skirill — no name
Published: 2013-03-16 06:21:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 14029; Favourites: 483; Downloads: 143
Redirect to original
Description
really don't know how to entitle this one, may be someones from my watcher will have any idea...Related content
Comments: 109
"The seed"
Reminds me of the branches of a Twisted Hazel tree.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Sour 'bout life" x) Anyway it's really creepy cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ээ..хм, кажись ноунэйм это самое подходящее)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ну, я просто через название пытаюсь придать смысл всей этой хренотени ) точнее отразить свои ощущения что ли
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Возникла тут ассоциация с оказанием помощи другим людям, которые это не ценят. А потом еще и на шею садятся. Может попадались такие. Вот и получается, что мысли и дела во все стороны разбросаны, а свои собственные руки-ноги связаны нафиг)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rather it's "anti-decay", but may be... thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Then you're may be in the right direction, or left direction...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
'cause sometime they just want it )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So that we can easily refer to it later? It's kind of hard to refer to something or search for it when it lacks a unique name. It's also less memorable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Some of the best art I've ever seen had no names. Because humans didn't create it. Yet, it exists and was extremely memorable to me.
Aside from the fact that this was a rhetorical question, why did you even reply to this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Why wouldn't I? It was question that I had an answer to, and it didn't seem like a rhetorical question. My bad, if you didn't expect an answer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
An answer is irrelevant if the question was not intended to be answered. Thought provocation is the aim, not enhancing someones ego. Art does not require a name to be remembered. Media makes something more popular, but not more beautiful. Remember that.
Also, I thought it a quite obvious rhetorical question. -My- bad, if you didn't see it. I'll have to make it even more obvious next time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Regardless of your intent(which I obviously didn't get), I thought it was an excellent question that begged discussion. Thought provoking is nice, but it's always much better when people actually argue about the subject. I, for one, think that naming art-and anything, really- is good practice with many advantages. You apparently think otherwise. Don't you think it would be much better for at least one of us if we actually discussed the subject until we reached a consensus?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not really, no. If I had started the topic with the intent of changing someones opinion, I would have started with a less rhetorical question.
In any case, I'm not interested in argument for arguments sake.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
'And that's when the shrooms kicked in'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"No name" seems like a rather apt title from what I'm seeing. A being without a name with a face obscured by a million questions (tentacles).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
well, I thought it would be too simple... I just can't describe my feelings about that. Anyway thank you very much for your help and point of view!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
already have one, thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
not quiet) you see, I thought it grows from ceiling or smth like that. Vase is interesting idea for the next work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"the other being" or the brith of non-living
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
it fits to whole their world
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>