HOME | DD

smashmethod In reply to DavidJCobb [2007-03-16 01:57:08 +0000 UTC]

indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomasng In reply to James-Is-James [2006-07-23 23:12:43 +0000 UTC]

Your bathtub?! OMG. Maybe it is time to move out of town.

Nice photo anyway, but i have seen worse. Just go to your nearest big pier. Water there is almost plain black.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

James-Is-James In reply to thomasng [2006-07-25 23:41:10 +0000 UTC]

It's when there are floating clumps of stuff that i get a little queasy....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

smashmethod In reply to gebimble [2006-07-23 04:48:44 +0000 UTC]

tox·ic·i·ty Audio pronunciation of "toxicity" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (tk-ss-t)
n. pl. tox·ic·i·ties

1. The quality or condition of being toxic.
2. The degree to which a substance is toxic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gebimble In reply to smashmethod [2006-07-23 11:30:06 +0000 UTC]

Very informative, Cap'n Smashy.

Alright, I concede that it might not have been a name inspired by S.O.A.D. and apologise.

"Toxicities" sounds quite a nice word by the way. And i thank you for bringing it to my attention.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

smashmethod In reply to nordicskiah [2006-07-22 17:28:22 +0000 UTC]

It has no drainage.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ster-lob In reply to Ceud [2006-07-22 15:36:59 +0000 UTC]

You know, it really is a great photo of water. Not many people can take a picture of water, and still have it look cool. I mean, I can't, and I've tried. Many times.

And Smashy is only wasting his time if he didn't want to take the picture in the first place. Otherwise, the only time that is being wasted is that of the water's, and I'm pretty sure the water didn't have anything better to do in the first place.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ceud In reply to ster-lob [2006-07-23 08:30:14 +0000 UTC]

You know, it is just water. Ok, dirty water. Calling a photo of dirty water "cool" or "great" is clearly an overstatement. Yes, the colours are full and the light is good but who gives a damn? What's with your sensitivity, man? This is f*cking water, stock shit. Nothing of value.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

M319 In reply to Ceud [2006-07-31 01:31:47 +0000 UTC]

oh shut the fuck up. who asked you? i bet you couldnt get a pic that good. taking a pic of water isnt that easy. you have to have a good camara. or all the light will bounce off it and make it look white. if it isnt in the right position.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ceud In reply to M319 [2006-07-31 18:26:40 +0000 UTC]

I don't give a fuck about who asked me because that is not the point of giving comments on someone's stuff here. The point is being critical, not to let people do worthless pictures of water (the same goes with for instance pictures of the sky, clouds ["wow, it's.... the air! look how beautiful the air is"_retarded shit]). Or simply expressing my dissatisfaction with such photos and the retarded people who think it has anything to do with beauty or art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rasse In reply to Ceud [2006-07-22 10:40:26 +0000 UTC]

Can't but disagree, it's great contrast to the 3d stuff on a white background and the stuff with a lot of those splash-brushes of yours (not that I'm belittling them at all, like 'em much too).
Your photographs are more than welcome to your gallery in my opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ceud In reply to Rasse [2006-07-23 08:36:34 +0000 UTC]

Can't say I comprehend what you are saying about my "stuff" since I've got none and won't have any (and I've hit the +fav button by mistake a few times, hence the stupid pictures on my "site"). I have no talent whatsoever, but that does not deprive me from the right to criticize people wasting time on making photos of dirty water, or expressing my embarrassment with the people who find it "cool", "great" etc.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rasse In reply to Ceud [2006-07-23 20:41:46 +0000 UTC]

..and I was talking about smashy's work here, referring to your comment
Maybe I should've been SLIGHTLY clearer

👍: 0 ⏩: 0