HOME | DD

SmashupMashups β€” Paramount Prime promotion image

#cbs #idea #streaming_service #nickelodeon #star_trek #paramount_pictures
Published: 2019-12-27 04:06:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 3131; Favourites: 17; Downloads: 8
Redirect to original
Description

This is an idea for a streaming service for Paramount Pictures and some selected company assets to ViacomCBS, Paramount Prime.

Inspiration came from Disney+, to which I had a bit of a ball using during my time living in Cedryc's new apartment.


My streaming service idea features content from:

Paramount Pictures (Paramount Animation, Paramount Television)

Nickelodeon (Nickelodeon Animation Studio, Nickelodeon Movies; only consisting with its fully CGI films)

Star Trek (from The Original Series, the Kelvin Timeline films, et cetera)

and CBS Entertainment Group (CBS Television Distribution, CBS Films).


Like Disney+, it doesn't carry any mature content, mainly TV-MA and R-rated content; the service is only gonna have suitable content.


For more information about my idea, you can click the link below this, because I don't wanna go through this here.

Link: ideas.fandom.com/wiki/Paramoun…

Related content
Comments: 111

SmashupMashups In reply to ??? [2020-06-18 22:39:11 +0000 UTC]

Screw that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 22:39:39 +0000 UTC]

What? It’s a great idea.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 22:41:22 +0000 UTC]

It needs Paramount's name, and it's only listing content that's rated G, PG, PG-13, TV-Y7, TV-Y7-FV, TV-G, TV-PG, and probably TV-14.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 22:44:38 +0000 UTC]

CBS’s name would do just fine. They had HBO Max replace HBO Now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 22:45:39 +0000 UTC]

So what? I'm still gonna use Paramount's name.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 22:47:13 +0000 UTC]

Well, Paramount could still replace CBS All Access to also include more adult content, and not just family content.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 22:57:59 +0000 UTC]

This streaming service is for family content.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 22:58:53 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but they should also show adult content to replace CBS All Access.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 23:00:16 +0000 UTC]

No adult content. Period.
Paramount Prime will only be for audiences around the ages 8 to 15.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 23:00:59 +0000 UTC]

Idk, people seem to like my idea of replacing CBS All Access. Sorry.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 23:02:45 +0000 UTC]

And Paramount Prime's not gonna replace CBS All Access; Paramount Prime's gonna be its own streaming service.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 23:03:38 +0000 UTC]

Well, Paramount has made Rated R movies in their own brand.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 23:05:21 +0000 UTC]

Paramount Prime's only gonna have content that's rated:
G
PG
PG-13
TV-Y7
TV-Y7-FV
TV-G
TV-PG
and probably TV-14.

Case closed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 23:05:47 +0000 UTC]

Aw man

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 23:06:18 +0000 UTC]

Geez, it's like you want this to be like HBO Max.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 23:38:04 +0000 UTC]

I do

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 23:38:54 +0000 UTC]

Well, how about this? Paramount Prime's gonna be like Disney+ and CBS All Access can be HBO Max.
How's that?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 23:40:04 +0000 UTC]

Actually, CBS All Access can close down, and CBS Prime will be Paramount’s version of HBO Max. I’m sorry.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 23:40:28 +0000 UTC]

You're so incorrigible.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 23:40:48 +0000 UTC]

I’m sorry

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 23:41:53 +0000 UTC]

Besides, what have you got against CBS All Access?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 23:42:34 +0000 UTC]

It’s not bad, but what if you need a cable provider to watch on demand movies or live TV?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 23:42:51 +0000 UTC]

How about Pluto TV?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-18 23:43:35 +0000 UTC]

That is fine, but what if you need to pay for a platform that costs $5 a month?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-18 23:45:09 +0000 UTC]

Well, I've thought about having a user pay $4.99 a month for Paramount Prime.

BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN I'M GONNA INCLUDE R-RATED IR TV-MA CONTENT, EVER!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DannyD1997 In reply to SmashupMashups [2020-06-19 00:32:50 +0000 UTC]

Okay

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to DannyD1997 [2020-06-19 00:34:46 +0000 UTC]

I also have a trope page you can read: ideas.fandom.com/wiki/Paramoun…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:19:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:19:36 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:20:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:20:26 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:21:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:21:46 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:22:13 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:23:13 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:27:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:28:25 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:29:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:29:25 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:38:35 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:39:47 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:45:30 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:45:44 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:45:55 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:46:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:46:16 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:47:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:48:03 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SmashupMashups In reply to MattJacks2003 [2022-03-05 17:48:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MattJacks2003 In reply to SmashupMashups [2022-03-05 17:49:05 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>