HOME | DD

smudge-2k9 — ying yang

Published: 2009-02-12 16:38:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 295; Favourites: 2; Downloads: 1346
Redirect to original
Description the simbol of peace
Related content
Comments: 120

smudge-2k9 In reply to ??? [2014-07-15 18:18:59 +0000 UTC]

someone could have spammed it

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Caw-the-rooks In reply to smudge-2k9 [2014-07-16 15:07:33 +0000 UTC]

I don't get why they'd want it though, I mean no offense but this is the lowest quality piece of shart I've ever seen. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smudge-2k9 In reply to Caw-the-rooks [2014-07-17 01:37:40 +0000 UTC]

they did it just because i dont know 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Elitegengar In reply to smudge-2k9 [2014-07-15 19:35:42 +0000 UTC]

Lol, "someone."

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Psychedelic-swirl [2014-07-13 22:10:39 +0000 UTC]

Yep 'simbol' & 'ying' are incorrect, don't worry though, the art's cool

Imma use it for my facebook profile

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smudge-2k9 In reply to Psychedelic-swirl [2014-07-14 11:28:47 +0000 UTC]

yeah it was one of the first things i uploaded and i didnt spell check it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Psychedelic-swirl In reply to smudge-2k9 [2014-07-14 13:37:03 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I relait I always spell things wrong

I always wanted to make an avatar like this, how did you make it...like what programes did u use

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smudge-2k9 In reply to Psychedelic-swirl [2014-07-14 22:22:13 +0000 UTC]

i made it long ago ive forgoten

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Psychedelic-swirl In reply to smudge-2k9 [2014-07-15 14:57:20 +0000 UTC]

It looks like old Photoshop or maybe paint? The effects are rly good whatever, bet it took quite a few layers, ur a skilled digital artist

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smudge-2k9 In reply to Psychedelic-swirl [2014-07-15 18:19:13 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Psychedelic-swirl In reply to smudge-2k9 [2014-07-15 20:29:01 +0000 UTC]

NP

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Foxy-Knight [2014-07-13 21:36:16 +0000 UTC]

Sorry to be a grammar nazi but simbol should be symbol. That said I agree completely, this is a symbol is one of balance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smudge-2k9 In reply to Foxy-Knight [2014-07-14 11:28:52 +0000 UTC]

yeah it was one of the first things i uploaded and i didnt spell check it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Foxy-Knight In reply to smudge-2k9 [2014-07-14 11:29:42 +0000 UTC]

Sorry for being a nag

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smudge-2k9 In reply to Foxy-Knight [2014-07-14 12:28:39 +0000 UTC]

no its ok

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Foxy-Knight In reply to smudge-2k9 [2014-07-14 12:29:50 +0000 UTC]

Oh okay

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

oh-lol [2014-07-10 15:50:25 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah, it's "symbol of peace" not "simbol of peace." 

symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 
symbol 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Psychedelic-swirl In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-15 14:58:54 +0000 UTC]

Overkill, that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Psychedelic-swirl [2014-07-15 16:04:54 +0000 UTC]

Sorry bro.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Psychedelic-swirl In reply to oh-lol [2014-12-18 18:04:51 +0000 UTC]

it's okay

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Elitegengar [2014-07-10 13:10:38 +0000 UTC]

comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-10 13:26:15 +0000 UTC]

What's the point of that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-10 13:27:50 +0000 UTC]

of what... typing "comment"?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-10 13:29:53 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it's kind of pointless tbh. 

Gengar's a cool pokemon though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-10 13:32:29 +0000 UTC]

that's kind of the joke though.

yeah it is; shadow ball, focus blast, energy ball, thunderbolt and it's pretty much unbeatable. especially as a mega.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-10 13:37:46 +0000 UTC]

I guess. 

Yep, I've used that combo before, it's very good. It's OU after all. One thing you might wanna incorporate dream eater or something, it makes for a nice surprise for the opponent, who will be expecting that other moveset you posted because of how common it is. 

You getting OR or AS?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-10 13:43:19 +0000 UTC]

that's a point, the opponent might have an effective counter ready precisely because it's so common. but i don't think it really matters because of how great a moveset/pokemon it is. it's just a great specially offensive pokemon.

i'm not exactly sure at this point but probably AS first, then maybe OR later, as i tend to like kyogre and team aqua more. i think kyogre is better than groudon both design-wise and battle-wise. how about you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-10 13:48:28 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, even with it being pretty generic and predictable, it puts up a tough fight. It has bad defenses though which is how the opponent could easily switch out into a dark type for instance and wipe it out in one or two hits.

Hey, that's exactly what I was thinking as well. AS, then perhaps OR afterwards. Your opinion is exactly mine too, we must think in a similar matter.

Oh, smudge-2k9 , it's "yin yang", not "ying yang."  

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-10 13:53:43 +0000 UTC]

that's true but remember, gengar has high speed as well, making it easily KOing a pokemon with SB before it has chance to retaliate. 

yeah, we seem to be very similar people.  

i told him that but i doubt he'll change it...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-10 13:58:37 +0000 UTC]

True, true. 

I told him too, before writing that comment. I guess you know him too? 

This may seem random, but what do you think about the mind control conspiracy of HAARP?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-10 14:06:43 +0000 UTC]

yeah. interesting how we do too. have we met before? we might've without realising.

erm, not much tbh. i think it's just that, a conspiracy. i could see how HAARP could transmit a widespread electromagnetic field that could disrupt the ordinary frequency of the human mind, and if they broadcasted a signal through this EM field than theoretically they could control people into doing whatever they want. there's also the possibility of them disrupting brainwave states such as theta, in which case they could make people get into a receptive sub-conscious state and instill doctrines of their choosing, much like a modern-day religion. 

this is all theoretical though, i highly doubt HAARP is actually going this. most conspiracies are made up by people a bit on the 'wacky' side.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-12 23:35:46 +0000 UTC]

I doubt it really. We would have known otherwise. Unless you're that old homeless guy I come across every time I walk down a street two blocks from my home. Then again, how would you have access to the internet?

That's interesting. Yeah, like a religion almost. But I think their purposes would be even more malevolent than merely control.

Sagittarius A* = black hole?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-12 23:44:32 +0000 UTC]

erm, right. 

a black hole, yes, a supermassive one at that. in fact it's a prominent theory that black holes caused the formation of galaxies in the first place.

want to start a countdown from 100? just so at the end of it, there'll be over 100 comments on this deviation, and the next part of the plan will have succeeded!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-12 23:48:01 +0000 UTC]

That's true. Gravity would pull together stars, and perhaps the black hole's angular momentum would cause the stars to rotate around it and eventually it would be the (bar) spiral we know it as today.

Yeah okay. It's getting boring to actually have to type out fully-fledged comments anyway. So: 100.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-12 23:49:17 +0000 UTC]

yes, exactly. well, something like that. blargh.

99

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-12 23:50:32 +0000 UTC]

98

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-12 23:51:16 +0000 UTC]

97

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-12 23:52:14 +0000 UTC]

96

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-12 23:52:54 +0000 UTC]

95

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-12 23:53:37 +0000 UTC]

94

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-12 23:54:22 +0000 UTC]

93

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-13 21:44:54 +0000 UTC]

92

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-13 21:45:45 +0000 UTC]

91

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-13 21:46:32 +0000 UTC]

90

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-13 21:47:29 +0000 UTC]

89

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-13 21:48:11 +0000 UTC]

88

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-13 21:48:59 +0000 UTC]

87

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-13 21:50:03 +0000 UTC]

86

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elitegengar In reply to oh-lol [2014-07-13 21:50:49 +0000 UTC]

85

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oh-lol In reply to Elitegengar [2014-07-13 21:51:38 +0000 UTC]

84

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>