HOME | DD
SolarSouth β Working days (part one)
#conceptart #digitalpainting #sciencefiction #wadimkashin #wadimkashinart
Published: 2016-04-21 21:12:50 +0000 UTC; Views: 21865; Favourites: 1090; Downloads: 790
Redirect to original
Description
My artworks for My personal series.ΒIn this topic there will be lots of artworks/concepts. (more info coming soon)Β
p.s. I'm really lack of time to draw for myself(
Related content
Comments: 28
π: 0 β©: 0
Tool Help to Paint with Β Touchpad
Look www.sensel.com/art/
--------------------------------------
π: 0 β©: 0
The layer compositing of this is a little weird; the outlines of the colored shadow on lower left, and the crowd looks just a *little* bit skewed; but overall the image layout and design itself is very good
π: 0 β©: 0
magical light effect! RΓ©alistic work! VERY GOOD WORKΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
Emmmmm... Is that really painted?! It looks almost to realistic!
π: 0 β©: 2
It's a technique called photobashing. Artists use photos and layer them with digital painting and manipulations to blend into a new image.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yes.
leventep.deviantart.com/art/Snβ¦
leventep.deviantart.com/art/Avβ¦
leventep.deviantart.com/art/Giβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
SchΓΆnes Spiel von Licht und Schatten.
π: 0 β©: 0
love how you made this kinda desaturated but very colorful at the same time Β
π: 0 β©: 0
I admire your technique. It's clear that you use a lot of stock, but it's used to beautiful effect.
π: 0 β©: 1
By 'a lot of stock', I'm guessing you mean photos are used?
I've been trying to discern whether this is piece and others are photobashed... sometimes it'sΒ difficult for me to tell if it's not outright admitted.
Especially so when plenty of photobashed concepts/pieces are categorized as paintings rather than photo manipulations.
π: 0 β©: 1
Trust your eyes. In this case, look closely at the faces and clothes in the crowd.
There are some fine details in there, completely real. The artist certainly didn't spend all that time making random bits photorealistic only to scribble random shapes for the rest of it!
Photos also tend to have a granular quality and can be obvious when compared to the broader digital brushstrokes.
But yes, it's not always easy to tell. It used to bother me though now I'm not so sure it matters. But it would be more honest to put it in 'mixed media' eh.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, I figured it was photobashed after my own dabbling in photobashing.
I still wish all photobashed pieces would be in either mixed media or photomanipulation; even use of textures, I still consider mixed media/photomanipulation.
And, yeah, I zoomed in on the crowd and something didn't feel right, even most of the buildings.
Thanks for that advice.
P.S. To anyone reading this, not degrading the piece itself, it's in my favourites, just saying pieces should be categorized honestly/accurately for aspiring concept-artists who wouldn't know otherwise.
π: 0 β©: 1
