HOME | DD

spawn2002 In reply to blitzkerieg [2004-01-06 08:28:53 +0000 UTC]

Thankyou my friend for the kind words.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

spawn2002 In reply to Wulfius-Khan [2004-01-06 08:36:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment.Unsure of what u mean by the reframe.The light was purposely done to give a lot of emphasis to the rose & not the girl.Thanks for the tip though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wulfius-Khan In reply to spawn2002 [2004-01-06 13:59:10 +0000 UTC]

Reframe:
The position of the rose and the girl in the frame of the picture.
Unless you have a reason for placing here where she is (this could be so)
it could be better. I read a lot about photography when I was younger so I am not
just speaking out of my sphincter.

Lighting:
The shadows are too harsh. But again it could have been your intended effect.
To mee they could be softer and the color of the light, its either sunset which is cool
or the glare of sodium lights which is yucky.

PS. Thanks for the comment on 'Lanette', very much appreciated.

I used to play with Poser so I know that it is quite an effort.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

spawn2002 In reply to Wulfius-Khan [2004-01-07 08:37:50 +0000 UTC]

Thankyou for the description.Is appreciated.Basically the whole image was just to convey the symbolism of the rose to the girl.Also the feeling of extreme loss & sadness.POssibly/probably the lighting,would/should be different.MIght have a fiddle with the scene & see what can/can't be done with it.Comments such as yours are always to be treasured because they make us all take a different view sometimes of our art.Once again,thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

spawn2002 In reply to rockyraccoon [2004-01-06 08:32:21 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment.A fellow aussie no less.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0