HOME | DD

Stampedes β€” Censor

Published: 2010-04-28 00:58:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 5354; Favourites: 272; Downloads: 63
Redirect to original
Description What's the point of putting a content warning on a stamp? It just makes the whole thing a censor box, and then no one will ever use it, or likely fav it. And then who gives a fuck what your stamp said?

If you're making a stamp with an opinion on it, or the language is offensive, then just let the people have it. You won't get banned or flamed or ridiculed. And if it's explicit material you're posting, 1) why the hell are you making it a stamp, and 2) you probably deserve to have it deleted anyway for not following the ToS.

This isn't a children's site. You can say fuck and not get in trouble. :/
Related content
Comments: 53

TheYellowTeam433 [2018-06-20 03:18:44 +0000 UTC]

fuck

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

flaminqobones [2018-01-29 02:17:30 +0000 UTC]

It depends on what the content is.
Of course, you shouldn't be putting the mature content warning on things like stamps, but I can see if you're going to do this on artwork.
For instance, one of the drawings I've submitted has a pretty large amount of blood in it, which makes sense, but censoring a drawing just because it says a swear word..? No, this isn't a kids' site, it states explicitly that it's for ages 13 and up, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's an 18+ site either.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ElfTheJew [2015-06-01 13:59:04 +0000 UTC]

It's just going to attract more attention to younger kids. If it's censored, it will gain Β more attention.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cat2999 [2014-08-20 13:20:28 +0000 UTC]

Fuck SOPA and PIPA

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chivi-chivik [2014-07-04 19:54:53 +0000 UTC]

I can understand censor on normal devs (to follow DA's ToS), but in Stamps is downright stupid.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

El-Drago-800 [2014-02-07 14:35:05 +0000 UTC]

"I disagree with your viewpoint but you are free to have that viewpoint so you should not be allowed to have that viewpoint." - Every pro-censorship person ever

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JAYBILANT [2013-06-02 08:10:06 +0000 UTC]

I don't even know what the point of putting censors on ANYTHING with "strong language" is... people around here need to grow up and stop worrying about some silly words.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Janet-Jackal [2013-04-05 09:15:52 +0000 UTC]

I know right? I hate censorship -__-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Christina2929 [2013-03-18 20:44:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xTechnologiic [2013-02-28 18:48:45 +0000 UTC]

It doesn't if you turn off hiding mature content :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

XMonochrome-NimbusX In reply to xTechnologiic [2015-02-25 00:14:16 +0000 UTC]

Which barely anyone does. I keep it on to avoid looking at some bimbo's low-rez-improperly-lighted tits.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

midnightlunarose In reply to XMonochrome-NimbusX [2015-09-17 01:44:40 +0000 UTC]

Same here.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

XMonochrome-NimbusX In reply to midnightlunarose [2015-09-17 01:49:33 +0000 UTC]

Ugh. Glad you agree :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

binarystep [2013-02-24 22:03:24 +0000 UTC]

I agree wholeheartedly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

imakocoa [2012-11-17 15:48:00 +0000 UTC]

I can understand the censor for like... stuff... but not for mildness... yknow?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SauceGhost [2012-10-08 22:55:03 +0000 UTC]

Seems like the site is turning into a child's website... ._.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WindowsAndLinuxFan In reply to SauceGhost [2016-09-10 19:57:28 +0000 UTC]

next step is to make it clouds a butterflys then allow every age to sign up XDDD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SauceGhost In reply to WindowsAndLinuxFan [2016-09-11 21:09:46 +0000 UTC]

lmao woah dude, you replied to a comment I wrote 4 years ago. Hello XD and that's funny lmao

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WindowsAndLinuxFan In reply to SauceGhost [2016-09-13 12:49:04 +0000 UTC]

Durp XDD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Math-X [2012-08-28 03:51:58 +0000 UTC]

fuck fuckity fuck fuck

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lyra-The-Lost [2012-08-23 16:24:28 +0000 UTC]

I know, right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Zero-Janitor [2012-08-23 05:48:21 +0000 UTC]

The "think of the children" excuse always struck me as dumb. DeviantART pretty much doesn't let anyone underage view mature content, and I'm not going to censor something for someone who shouldn't even be looking at it. If you want to lie about your age, you have to get the full extent of what that entails.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Skittles91k [2012-08-14 03:49:26 +0000 UTC]

EXACTLY
I don't see the point of making a stamp if you are just going to put a content warning on it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ShnarfBird [2012-08-09 21:42:23 +0000 UTC]

A: not everyone wants mature stuff anyway
B: some stuff on here is pretty damn gross sometimes
C: you can turn it off if it bugs you so much.
-The person below me. Kinda.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stampedes In reply to ShnarfBird [2012-08-11 17:57:26 +0000 UTC]

Read the artist's comments, please, so next time you don't entirely miss the point.
This stamp isn't about not censoring anything, it's about not censoring stamps. There is a plethora of distasteful, offensive stuff on this site, and by all means, give them all a warning. But it doesn't make sense to sensor a stamp. Ruins the entire point.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ShnarfBird In reply to Stampedes [2012-08-11 18:14:54 +0000 UTC]

I read the artist's comments and I didn't see anything about stamps when I wrote that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stampedes In reply to ShnarfBird [2012-08-13 05:31:24 +0000 UTC]

"What's the point of putting a content warning on a stamp" didn't stand out to you? It's the first sentence.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ShnarfBird In reply to Stampedes [2012-08-13 18:36:51 +0000 UTC]

It didn't exactly jump out...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sjcodan [2012-01-06 20:50:40 +0000 UTC]

Oh, never mind that. I didn't know this only meant stamps......

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sjcodan [2012-01-06 20:49:21 +0000 UTC]

a: some people use this in public, like me at school
b: not everyone wants mature stuff anyway
c: some stuff on here is pretty damn gross sometimes
d: you can turn it off if it bugs you so much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Krooked-Glasses [2011-11-30 21:30:15 +0000 UTC]

THANK. YOU. Why the fuck are children running around this site for, anyways?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xXxMiZuMiXmIkOxXx [2011-10-30 22:48:08 +0000 UTC]

THANK YOU. <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vSock [2011-06-26 05:51:37 +0000 UTC]

bless this stamp

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sunkissin [2011-05-08 01:38:36 +0000 UTC]

Oh my god THANK YOU.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

0202inferno [2011-03-07 23:54:50 +0000 UTC]

good point.....ocasional censor on stuf yeah but for saying fuck and stuff like it is pointless

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ResponsLive [2010-10-12 09:28:37 +0000 UTC]

I like it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EonOrteaShadowmaster [2010-09-28 06:19:00 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps you have a point...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheInimitableECypher [2010-06-08 23:05:19 +0000 UTC]

FUCK.

And good point. Enough with censorship. Seriously, anyone who needs to have a censorship filter is probably not old enough to be on dA, anyways.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

flamefireheart12 [2010-06-02 23:23:48 +0000 UTC]

i agree with u so much XD if some one wants to see it THEN LET THEM SEE IT SCREW THE LOSS OF CHILDRENS INNOCENCE XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Blue-Bracelet [2010-05-01 20:36:28 +0000 UTC]

thank you for makin' dis stamp

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

557M [2010-04-30 04:36:23 +0000 UTC]

I agree, but one of my stamps was actually -forced- to have a mature warning because someone reported it as "needing one".
I can understand if a stamp has cursing or gore on it-- after all, there are younger people surfing DA-- but agreed, I think people should just learn to cope with the fact that not everyone thinks alike when it comes to opinionated/controversial stamps.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stampedes In reply to 557M [2010-04-30 06:08:42 +0000 UTC]

Dear god, who's that sensitive? Half of this site is made up of furry so[link] now, and these people get offended over bad words?

And if it's an opinion - god forbid - and you have to censor it? I hate to play the arrogant-American card, but that's bullshit. :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

557M In reply to Stampedes [2010-04-30 07:52:37 +0000 UTC]

Ahah, aye. It's just... oye. So upon receiving the report, DA staff made sure the stamp had an "ideologically sensitive" warning. Agreed: bullshit's a good word for that. To make matters worse, I know of much more offensively stated opinions on DA stamps than the one I had censored.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stampedes In reply to 557M [2010-04-30 18:21:29 +0000 UTC]

I think the biggest fear dA has is getting sued, and that's why they let any report from some butthurt crybaby become cause for censorship.

But that's just me. :/
Also, sorry for the accidental link in my last reply. D:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

557M In reply to Stampedes [2010-04-30 19:34:43 +0000 UTC]

Hm, I suppose that makes sense.
Heh, not a problem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

harrypotterafan [2010-04-29 19:15:05 +0000 UTC]

I've seen a stamp that had "fuck" in the title, and was censored because the stamp itself said the same thing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stampedes In reply to harrypotterafan [2010-04-30 03:20:42 +0000 UTC]



This site.
I swear to God.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

harrypotterafan In reply to Stampedes [2010-04-30 04:41:05 +0000 UTC]


I know, we can swear the crap out of everything but in the deviations it must be censored.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

iKissMantids [2010-04-28 23:07:34 +0000 UTC]

WE CAN SAY FUCK? THANK FUCKING GOD. /sarcasm

But yeah, thank you for making this stamp. I never saw the point in censoring stamps of all things.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stampedes In reply to iKissMantids [2010-04-29 00:08:43 +0000 UTC]

De nada.

Baller icon, btw. x3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>