HOME | DD

stormdancerr In reply to Sgtgrandpa [2008-07-29 10:02:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks heaps

and thanks for the add, and collections too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sgtgrandpa In reply to stormdancerr [2008-08-03 10:52:53 +0000 UTC]

Your work is work every Kilobyte.
*Wicked-LandScapes is getting ready to do a new artpack. Needs a theme. Got any ideas?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stormdancerr In reply to nick-f [2008-05-05 08:49:07 +0000 UTC]

thanks !!
and thanks for the fav too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nick-f In reply to stormdancerr [2008-05-05 09:17:15 +0000 UTC]

No probs!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stormdancerr In reply to realmauz [2007-11-14 22:29:04 +0000 UTC]

Thanks
apaophysis

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stormdancerr In reply to icemother [2007-11-09 11:55:08 +0000 UTC]

thank you
and thanks for the Fav !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

icemother In reply to stormdancerr [2007-11-09 12:02:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stormdancerr In reply to VirusNO1 [2007-01-24 08:28:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks heaps !!
I had to take the frame off though, it was way too bulky, fits on my site such that it is, but, really doesnt work here

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stormdancerr In reply to Halcyon83 [2007-01-24 08:13:54 +0000 UTC]

there we go, frame gone
next time I wont be so damned lazy lol


this was forced rotation
(done a while ago, I thought Id lost the file though until recently)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halcyon83 In reply to stormdancerr [2007-01-24 08:27:37 +0000 UTC]

this looks way better

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stormdancerr In reply to Halcyon83 [2007-01-23 12:03:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks heaps !!

primary reason the frame is there is because I was too lazy to find the original, I just took all these from my own site lol, its late here and Im tired !!

working on replacing them, probably with no frames at all

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halcyon83 In reply to stormdancerr [2007-01-23 12:38:20 +0000 UTC]

well, there's nothing wrong with a frame actually, but it should be subtle imo . it cannot draw more attention than the actual fractal, which in this case was stunning.
did u use forced rotation on this by the way? or was it just by triangle-manipulation?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0