HOME | DD
sunnysidewalks — Aromantic Pride Flag
Published: 2014-07-23 06:20:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 2904; Favourites: 43; Downloads: 2
Redirect to original
Description
credit to for their base hereRelated content
Comments: 112
ANYWAYS this was super fun but i have to get back to doing art and being productive and overall better than you in every way
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Awh, more with the dumbass not realizing what a troll is, and is so narasisticicic, they think they be better then meeee
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'd rather be someone feeding a potential troll than the actual troll
Anyone's better than someone that chooses to willfully waste their time being an insufferable prick.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
It's okay. It's just a ~social experiment~, after all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Prob an experiment for school
Their teacher when they hand in their report later: "Wow, you didn't have to be such a dick"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh my GOD
(Also nice flag glowkaiju, I'm sure a lot of people are legitimately glad to have it available. ;w; )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Awh, I thought you'd be happy! Internet is your whole life, so why not?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not sure how you expect people to support your patreon if you're going to be a shitty person on your DA ahahahhaha.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Only shit to sjws and snowflakes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nah Sanders for all the free shit
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Donald Trump wants a free wall from Mexico; that seems in line with both your morals and your desire for free shit
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Huh, didn't realize you choose to be born in Mexico
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Also, surely you must have something better to do than be an asshole on an image that was made in 2014? Way to beat a dead horse, pally.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Do I guess people should not bother with the Mona Lisa because it's so old? Got cha
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're comparing a topical piece of famous art to you being an asshole on an old DA image?
If you insist on such a comparison, though, here's how stupid you look--
You might as well have walked into an art gallery surrounded by people that know more about art than you do, pointed to a blue painting and said it was red.
Everyone here clearly knows more about asexuality and aromanticism than you do, and yet here we are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So you are OK with made up lables but Shame the color blind? How ablist are you now
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Generally speaking, someone who is aware of a visual impairment is not going to insist that other people see the world in the manner that they do. If someone is aware that they cannot see the colour blue, they wouldn't insist that an image they can assume might be blue is actually of a different colour.
I have visual snow, but it would be gaslighting at best if I told other people that they should be seeing snow over their vision constantly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow, you acknowledge something that's biological? Witchcraft!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sexuality is a biological part of a person, so idk where you're trying to come from
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aromantic can be a spectrum of not experiencing romantic attraction to others.
each aromantic person can be different within their feelings towards romantic attraction.
it could span from one being completely repulsed towards receiving/giving romantic attraction,
or it could go to experiencing platonic attraction but being uncomfortable when faced with romantic attraction.
or sure in your words romance version on nonsexual (guessing you mean asexual)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Asexual is a means of self reproduction. Not a lack of interest in intercourse
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
ANYWAYS first off the proper term for what you're referring to as "asexual reproduction" is 👍: 0 ⏩: 1
asexual is an easily arrived at to be coined term for a spectrum of people who lack interest in sexual relations. prefix "a", not of, and sexual. Which makes it a perfectly valid and widely used label for that category of sexuality. dont bring that "uhhh asexual is self reproduction!!!!!" onto someone's Clearly For Goddamn Aromantics thread unless you were... looking for a fight or trolling in which case??? good on you ??? for being a shitty person?? the preferred term is asexual and not for you to decide whether we should be using it or not- other terms such as homo and heterosexual follow in the same line of prefixing as asexual as well.
aromantic is indeed a spectrum of not being attracted romantically to people, as ASEXUALITY is not being attracted sexually to people.
which brings me to another point that would be "nonsexual" basically is a descriptor of a situation. if i hold hands with someone, chaste smooch etc its just nonsexual. if im eating popcorn or drawing or some shit it can be nonsexual. asexuality isn't just lacking interest in intercourse. that would be more of your libido- you can be ace and have a high libido, you just dont look at people and be attracted to them specifically in a sexual manner.
you have no place to invalidate asexuals, ever, no returns no exceptions you do not have a voice on this and we face this, many times from probably benignly ignorant people like you, but its tiring.
Invalide because I call bullshit on people needed lables for everything? Alright
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wouldn't 'nonsexual' also be a label though, just a different word???
I'm also curious if you think people who are, like, gay or otherwise outside the (subjective and culturally-defined) norm as not needing labels too, or just asexual people...? (Not trying to start shit, I'm actually curious.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm talking about People who need fifty different labels for one thing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
right, because having different genders, and using one or two terms for themselves is totally out of line and you can't stand it because your tiny head can't wrap around the fact that people don't fit into a strict binary all the time
you can't be kind, emotive, soft, AND blonde! choose one! what? theres redheads and brunettes and blackhaired people too? wtf!!!!!!!! just dont!!!!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You do know all those "binary" genders are almost all hormone problems, or have other factors to them? I was genderfuild, then, got some hormone shots. All content now
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
..son. buddy. "binary genders" is the societal male and female... are you like... saying those are also hormone problems... like if someone is trans... then even if its a brief flux up, its still valid. their gender during that time is still valid.
and if someone is a trans guy, get this, hes a /guy/. getting hormone replacement therapy to become closer to the image he wants makes people More Content lol but hes still trans?? literally just because your genderfluidity ended up a hormone shit doesnt mean anyone else is. are you bitter or something about that? sure sounds like it bitch
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HOW DARE YOU MISS GENDER ME!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
somehow i get the feeling ur not actually offended by the "son. buddy" meme so i dont actually feel bad lmao, i never feel bad for people like you who make fun of dysphoric people/trans people and misgendering
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, I'm not. Because I got fucking medical attention and didn't refuse it because I didn't want to lose three lables
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
literally Not Everything Can Be Damn Cured By Medical Attention. im not going to hide mental illnesses and none of us have to for your comfort
people being offended at things... fucking happens? ?? literally like?? if you go up to someone who lost their family in an accident and start fucking making fun of them like "JUST GET THERAPY FOR IT! GET OVER IT! DO CAR CRASHES TRIIIIIGGER YOU???" thats... honestly shitty and i can see you doing that
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
anyone who isnt a bigot is a feminist like?? i already knew you werent a feminist from ur demeanor but yeah all genders are fucking equal, you're derailing the conversation because you have no response
you have never had a real response
you are a waste of space
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shows how small your world view is. Thinking women getting acid splashing on there face us equity
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If you google the word asexual, you will actually find information on asexuality as a sexual orientation before you see anything about asexual reproduction.
You're not just bigoted, you're wrong in terms of the actual definition of this word, seeing as you're choosing to ignore the most widely used definition of this word.
It's also worth mentioning that the word straight can be used to describe a direction just as much as a is it used to describe a sexual orientation-- that doesn't mean that one of the definitions or uses is incorrect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Google is the best source of I formation! That's how I found out I have autism! And really, you use the term "bigot" so loosely it has no meaning
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's funny to hear someone telling me I use a word loosely, when you can't even use a word past a single definition.
Speaking of reproducing, I hope that you do not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Seeing as I'm aro and you don't believe my sexuality exists, I can't say I feel bad about missing that mark.
To rephrase things though, I hope that you never raise any children to be as ignorant as yourself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Huh, don't think I ever denied you, my lord. Just said asexual was biological
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Asexual is a means of self reproduction. Not a lack of interest in intercourse"
Ace and aro go hand in hand (I am of both sexualities, myself). If you're going to be a little brat about denying the use of the term asexuality-- in the comments section of an aromantic flag image-- you've made your case clear.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Asked a simple question, and it turned to a war by you people
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Says the jerk that decided to deny a proper definition of asexuality, because you thought you were so cool using "nonsexual" instead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hey, I'm not the one who must fit in to a world of lables
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
except you're telling us to fit into "without gender" and "nonsexual".
you're the one labeling people.
if people don't want to be labeled, that's personal and what they do.
other people arent FITTING to their labels. theyre expressing who they are using recognized terms, terms recognized by people who aren't assholes like you lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Huh, seems like you're the one demanding I comply to people's lables
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>