HOME | DD

suzi9mm — sin is my middle name

Published: 2007-02-02 13:33:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 72447; Favourites: 2081; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description a cliché title for a cliché photo. i don't think cliché is such a curse word as many think, what would the world be like without all the nice clichés?

this is just an average one though, not like the best cliché taken to the max, i love trying to do that too. thinking of which...i better go shoot some...


she is diosa666.
Related content
Comments: 488

slipintoacoma In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 15:05:24 +0000 UTC]

baha, great title, cliche's aren't so bad

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AmzarahGunn In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 15:03:22 +0000 UTC]

Clichés can be good since it's a subject many people are familiar with, and since art is hugely dependant on response, the larger that response will be. More people will recognize what the concept means, I think. As long as it's done nicely, and this one is. n_n

I love the obscured face and the look in her eyes is amazing, so...seductive. But at the same time warning you away, and that alone makes you want to come closer. If that makes any sense. I love the position of the hair too, it gives her a really classically beautiful look. It borders the picture nicely, too. Well done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

suzi9mm In reply to AmzarahGunn [2007-02-04 11:58:28 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the thoughtful comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Icen In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 15:01:39 +0000 UTC]

Vereh sexeh ladeh!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dingabagi In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 15:01:27 +0000 UTC]

Views
Total: 666
Today: 666

am I lucky or what?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

suzi9mm In reply to dingabagi [2007-02-02 15:13:26 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mr-squirrel In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 14:51:04 +0000 UTC]

that's quite sexy,
i like how the hair's guiding my attention down to her décolleté...
.. and i wouldn't callit an "average" shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

suzi9mm In reply to mr-squirrel [2007-02-03 20:21:23 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

m-flair In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 14:50:44 +0000 UTC]

cliches are necessary and beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

adnrey In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 14:50:11 +0000 UTC]

unreal beautiful and amazing...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pekar In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 14:49:32 +0000 UTC]

Nice colors
But I would love to see her without signals

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rockfaerie666 In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 14:36:15 +0000 UTC]

I bet you're right about the cliche (red lipstick is such a cliche ). But nonetheless, that cliche really fits her so well. I love the soft lighting and the hair on her face, it's kinda mysterious I'd say.
Beautiful work overall, well done Jenni .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Morbid-HeroinChild In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 14:34:26 +0000 UTC]

She reminds me of Lust

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

imperfectdysfunction In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 14:32:51 +0000 UTC]

beautiful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dunadan-from-Bag-End In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:53:40 +0000 UTC]

nice light as always. I don't know... for me it is not really natural...
Did you use Sigma macro lens for this? ( 105mm ) or any macro? if yes - that's interesting - many people claim that macro lens are not good for portrait as they are too sharp - what do you think about this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

suzi9mm In reply to Dunadan-from-Bag-End [2007-02-02 14:25:44 +0000 UTC]

i can't remember which lens i used, either sigma 105 macro or canon's 24-105 which is not macro. but i love using the 105sigma for close up 'portraits' i don't give a shit about what people say i dig the look

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dunadan-from-Bag-End In reply to suzi9mm [2007-02-02 14:41:40 +0000 UTC]

I would like also not to 'give a shit what people say' but I have no ocassion to test. Anyway thanks for info and reply

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

clivita In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:53:22 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

b13visuals In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:50:17 +0000 UTC]

Cliché perhaps, I like it! What does that say about me...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hanny-fi In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:49:25 +0000 UTC]

I've noticed that I often let clichés restrict me.. That I'm so afraid of being anywhere near them that my creativity suffer from it. Now that I'm aware of it, I hope to do something about it, though.

This is a beautiful cliché, I must say.. The hair is gorgeous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

suzi9mm In reply to Hanny-fi [2007-02-02 14:17:03 +0000 UTC]

thankies

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RedIvan In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:46:05 +0000 UTC]

beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Torill-Morill In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:43:39 +0000 UTC]

Great shot!
The colors and shadings are awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CykeADelic In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:42:08 +0000 UTC]

Pretty model and nice lighting. Would have preferred a little bit more light. But i guess that´s your style
Well done. What kind of light source did you use? Is this artificial light?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

suzi9mm In reply to CykeADelic [2007-02-02 13:52:39 +0000 UTC]

might also look darker on your screen? dunno.

justa flash with a softbox

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CykeADelic In reply to suzi9mm [2007-02-02 13:55:45 +0000 UTC]

yeah, maybe. My screen here on work is not calibrated. Will have a look at your work as soon as I am back home (hopefully soon )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MargaretSeidler In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:39:54 +0000 UTC]

beautiful, but wich sin does she like the most??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

suzi9mm In reply to MargaretSeidler [2007-02-02 13:41:50 +0000 UTC]

guess??! lust i bet

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Parallel-Persona In reply to suzi9mm [2007-03-10 00:48:39 +0000 UTC]

she looks like this one character from a show called full metal alchemist, and the character's name is ironically lust.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Stjernefall In reply to Parallel-Persona [2007-11-20 10:32:23 +0000 UTC]

Just the same as I was thinking.
beautiful picture

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

obsidiansea In reply to Parallel-Persona [2007-03-18 20:36:15 +0000 UTC]

Yeah she does.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MargaretSeidler In reply to suzi9mm [2007-02-02 13:54:59 +0000 UTC]

haha so obvious xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raine-de-Mer In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:39:51 +0000 UTC]

Ahahaha! Hello, Sin . . .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Born2Run In reply to ??? [2007-02-02 13:36:34 +0000 UTC]

first comment! wow, you're beautiful...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KCK In reply to Born2Run [2007-02-02 18:45:23 +0000 UTC]

You must not have read the description . . .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightLolita In reply to KCK [2007-02-04 08:07:47 +0000 UTC]

To comment that fast, you can't take the time to read descriptions

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KCK In reply to NightLolita [2007-02-05 07:13:51 +0000 UTC]

I have a tendancy to state the obvious . . .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |