HOME | DD

Published: 2009-11-10 04:48:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 27631; Favourites: 175; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
becase many have asked me, OY19 also requested it a few months ago~Edit~ I've been asked alot on wheres' the logic this has, TF wize . well I didn't think about it much sadly to say. so let's see. what if the tail merges with the legs, but the Crotch devider on the boxers ripped during the TF so thus both leg bones would sora desolve into flesh but the tail would extend the back bone, thus having a long Vertebra similar to a snake.
anywho, Thanksssss for all you fans. ^^
Related content
Comments: 39
Icaron [2011-01-09 15:58:52 +0000 UTC]
One can arguably find logic in either method of snake transformation, especially when considering that transformation from species to species like this, is an inherently illogical process. This kind of thing just doesn't happen in nature, so justifying it with evolutionary comparative anatomy both does and does not make sense.
My opinion is that because this is incredibly unlikely to ever happen (Though not impossible) in reality, it is up to the preference of the person to decide. When fiction becomes fact, will be the only way to know exactly, and that could be a good ways off. I happen to love leg merging
Also, remember Occam's Razor; All things being equal, the simpler explanation is usually best. That can help you form a hypothesis on things like this.
π: 0 β©: 1
SwichWitch In reply to Icaron [2011-01-11 02:08:17 +0000 UTC]
Yep I know itβs confusing as heck. It wasnβtβ thought out well so thus the drawings donβt make since. .I donβt intend much logic in some of my drawings. More enjoyment then anything.
π: 0 β©: 0
3waycrash [2009-11-11 21:25:43 +0000 UTC]
cool, a snake tf ^^
I'm not too fond of them, but you just made me like them, well this one anyway XD
π: 0 β©: 1
SwichWitch In reply to 3waycrash [2009-11-12 17:48:34 +0000 UTC]
Heheh I'm glad to hear that ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
KirbyFlash [2009-11-10 20:53:51 +0000 UTC]
This is cool.
You actually don't find alot of snake tfs around. :\
π: 0 β©: 0
Latiaslord [2009-11-10 20:12:10 +0000 UTC]
Pretty good. I'm looking forward to more and more.
π: 0 β©: 0
Oy19 [2009-11-10 14:28:13 +0000 UTC]
Awesome!
And don't worry about the merging thing, I love it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Whammyman5 [2009-11-10 12:42:40 +0000 UTC]
Eh, considering the subject matter do we really have room to talk about being 'realistic'? Though having a tail grow then the legs merging does seem kind of redundant...
Art wise it looks fine though
π: 0 β©: 1
SwichWitch In reply to Whammyman5 [2009-11-10 18:25:32 +0000 UTC]
yeah I didn't think much logic into it -~-;
thanks ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
BlueDraconicKnight [2009-11-10 06:34:37 +0000 UTC]
Wow.. You really have improved at drawing these. And yeah legmerging, some people think it is too unrealistic. But I think it is o.k in some occasions.
π: 0 β©: 1
SwichWitch In reply to BlueDraconicKnight [2009-11-10 18:24:10 +0000 UTC]
thankyou ^^
meh I tried to think about it, didn't do to much thinking though ^^:
π: 0 β©: 1
Dragoniade [2009-11-10 05:00:01 +0000 UTC]
Nice transformation.
But leg merging on a snake?! Nooooooo!
π: 0 β©: 2
testzero In reply to Dragoniade [2009-11-10 06:58:43 +0000 UTC]
If you look closely, she both grows a tail, and the legs merge.
How the hell THAT works is beyond me, but there ya go.
π: 0 β©: 3
Dragoniade In reply to testzero [2009-11-11 13:07:33 +0000 UTC]
You're right, I didn't notice that detail on the 3rd frame.
But as you say, how that would work is a mystery. On a bigger specie, the shrinking legs could theoretically merge back with the growing tail, sort of like a tree branch ends up merging back with the trunk if it grow alongside it. But on a small snake, not sure.
Still, it's a good transformation nonetheless
π: 0 β©: 0
SwichWitch In reply to testzero [2009-11-11 06:36:29 +0000 UTC]
sorry didn't think much logic into it
π: 0 β©: 0
purppanther In reply to testzero [2009-11-10 21:06:04 +0000 UTC]
That's actually a guy
π: 0 β©: 1
SwichWitch In reply to purppanther [2009-11-11 06:35:54 +0000 UTC]
-bows- thankyou great person that knows how to indentify gender but I do belive he ment that 'she' as in I the artist, it doesnot matter to me though ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
purppanther In reply to SwichWitch [2009-12-09 02:48:01 +0000 UTC]
No, I'm certain that test meant the person in the art.
π: 0 β©: 0
SwichWitch In reply to Dragoniade [2009-11-10 05:01:34 +0000 UTC]
o.o oh leg merging is bad?...oops
thanks though ^^
π: 0 β©: 2
coco066 In reply to SwichWitch [2010-02-02 22:39:34 +0000 UTC]
Personally, I like leg merging on snake <(o.o<)
π: 0 β©: 0
Dragoniade In reply to SwichWitch [2009-11-11 13:20:07 +0000 UTC]
Well, not exactly bad, but more illogical, unless it's otherwise explicitly wanted.
The best example, I remember seeing a TF picture where twisted evil witch would 'twist' the TF around, at the horror of the tranformed. It was something where the front would become the back and vice versa, aka the butt would become the head, the head the behind, the arms the forelegs, and the leg the hindlegs.
Otherwise, it make as much sense as the Iceberg Tf where a person on his back 'transform' into a belly lying position, with the throat becoming the back of the head and vice versa.
Still, it's details, which doesn't deny the good in that well drawn transformation sequence.
π: 0 β©: 0