HOME | DD

Published: 2008-02-09 01:18:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 9692; Favourites: 1485; Downloads: 91
Redirect to original
Description
Another little stampthing
that took about a minute from my life 8I
I have a feeling i misspelt something on it but whatever
Related content
Comments: 138
puredecorum [2009-05-03 19:31:35 +0000 UTC]
Asexual people don't have sexual feelings or interests.
Your stamp doesn't make sense?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
dracotheferret In reply to puredecorum [2011-01-31 04:50:05 +0000 UTC]
I think they mean asexual reproduction...y'know...like amoebas?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TakikoSohma In reply to puredecorum [2009-06-29 04:03:37 +0000 UTC]
Lol was kinda about to say that...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GalenaLarkin In reply to ??? [2009-02-02 03:21:12 +0000 UTC]
Inaccurate use of word. Stamp fail
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tangeloh In reply to GalenaLarkin [2009-02-02 03:36:49 +0000 UTC]
if you want i'll make another one
seriously... i mean hah hah its not like i came up with the phrase
so whatever
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Binkyfm In reply to ??? [2009-01-30 20:08:21 +0000 UTC]
Asexual?
I think you mean Hermaphrodite, that would make a lot more sense but be less catchy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Tangeloh In reply to Binkyfm [2009-02-02 01:46:11 +0000 UTC]
someone already beat you to that, sorry! insert 25 cents to try again
not like I even made up the phrase hah hah.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
aaawhyme In reply to ??? [2009-01-21 23:26:52 +0000 UTC]
AMAZING!
The trick is to leave it in a secluded room/bag and wait to see what happens.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hollow-Fayt In reply to ??? [2009-01-16 04:27:26 +0000 UTC]
Lol, I should tell my Biology teacher that.. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Songdogx In reply to ??? [2008-12-14 06:36:54 +0000 UTC]
I think you're confusing asexuality with being a hermaphrodite...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Toast-Maniac In reply to Songdogx [2009-08-16 22:46:49 +0000 UTC]
Not really. The definition they are using refers to the type of breeding that most sponges and other simple life forms use to reproduce.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mystchiae In reply to ??? [2008-04-14 00:47:54 +0000 UTC]
...that would be rather helpful right now.
Hayhayhay, does you know what the solution to -3n(2n-5)=0 is?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Mimisaurus In reply to Mystchiae [2008-12-19 18:38:11 +0000 UTC]
n= 0, n = 5/2
Equate both parts to 0 once you factor them.
I know this is a lot late, but I couldn't help it. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mystchiae In reply to Mimisaurus [2008-12-20 06:35:50 +0000 UTC]
A bit late...
But thanks!
I'm sure I figured it out...sometime ago...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Saramoon23 In reply to Mystchiae [2008-07-20 23:15:03 +0000 UTC]
I hated completing the square.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mystchiae In reply to Saramoon23 [2008-07-20 23:21:28 +0000 UTC]
yes, sux.
I think I got it...not sure...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BlackWerewolfDemon In reply to ??? [2008-02-10 07:08:13 +0000 UTC]
omg that is the most clever thing I've ever heard XD
I'm so using that now lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Electromechanical In reply to ??? [2008-02-09 17:24:18 +0000 UTC]
But then it'd be all gross when you'd turn it in and everyone would think you were a disgusting pervert.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tangeloh In reply to Electromechanical [2008-02-09 18:04:20 +0000 UTC]
everyone already thinks I'm a dsigusting pervert u__u
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Electromechanical In reply to Tangeloh [2008-02-09 18:06:18 +0000 UTC]
Guess you have nothing to lose then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fizen In reply to ??? [2008-02-09 02:17:19 +0000 UTC]
You are very proud of this phrase aren't you
..I'll add it when I get another subby.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
VintagelyConstructed In reply to ??? [2008-02-09 01:30:51 +0000 UTC]
naw i doubt you'd have to adult this hsfdfd
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tangeloh In reply to ??? [2008-02-09 01:19:43 +0000 UTC]
i guess i have to adult imnotsure alkjhdfaf
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |