HOME | DD

tatasz β€” Glass

#abstract #abstractart #apophysis #background #bipolar #bloom #chaotica #concept #conceptual #desktop #digital #digitalart #flower #fractal #wallpaper
Published: 2018-05-28 17:53:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 5308; Favourites: 152; Downloads: 149
Redirect to original
Description Apophysis and Chaotica
Related content
Comments: 12

roup14 [2018-07-07 20:16:15 +0000 UTC]

soΒ lovely Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jim88bro [2018-06-01 21:15:10 +0000 UTC]

Incredible lighting!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tatasz In reply to jim88bro [2018-06-09 13:39:51 +0000 UTC]

thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kuzy62 [2018-05-30 09:41:47 +0000 UTC]

Excellent!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DinkydauSet [2018-05-29 23:33:24 +0000 UTC]

excellent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MisterManGuyOfStuff [2018-05-29 14:09:03 +0000 UTC]

And so we travel FURTHER into the mandelbrot set...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sragets [2018-05-29 12:03:32 +0000 UTC]

This is one I'd love to know how to do. How to put flowers into another fractal!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tatasz In reply to sragets [2018-06-01 19:36:18 +0000 UTC]

Well, pretty much xaos tricks... Not sure if possible to follow, but here is a short step by step (poke if you need more info).

1. start with a basic flower, but without the camera transform.Β Bloom 01
2. Now, set opacity of both transforms to 0, and add a new transform. for this new transform, switch to the xaos tab, and set "to" weights only to the transform that has blur (0 to everything else). Now, replace linear with julian (same setup as the final transform for blooms).Β Bloom2 Β - here i also tweaked the bloom a bit so it actually looks like bloom.
You see that there is blur around the bloom, which may be undesirable. To avoid this, still on this transform, set "from" weight from the blur transform to 0, so it receives points only from spherical.
3. now, add another transform. Set "from" xaos 1 from itself and the "Julian" transform, 0 from everything else. Set "to" weights 1 to itself and the blur transform, 0 to everything else. Replace linear with cool stuffΒ Bloom 3

Again this is a bad explanation, poke if you have any questions ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to tatasz [2018-06-28 18:11:14 +0000 UTC]

This is a good explanation. Thank you for taking the time to explain. I was able to follow all the way through!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vanBlood [2018-05-29 02:45:56 +0000 UTC]

Excellent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gerda1946 [2018-05-28 19:38:29 +0000 UTC]

A beautiful one!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

marijeberting [2018-05-28 19:00:04 +0000 UTC]

Very beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0