HOME | DD

Teratophoneus — Ichthyovenator laosensis

Published: 2012-04-24 17:52:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 13942; Favourites: 148; Downloads: 187
Redirect to original
Description Meet the latest spinosaurid on the block- Ichthyovenator! Its name means fish hunter due to its style of life. The animal was a baryonychid with an unique feature: a double sail!. The first and bigger one was on its back, the other one on its hips. Ichthyovenator was closely related to baryonyx but lived in Asia. It was described in 2012.
This is the third one on DA but it is the first one in a size comparison hahahahahaha,
Related content
Comments: 35

Rolandixor [2014-01-23 04:43:33 +0000 UTC]

Brings joy to my soul every time I see an illustration of a theropod without feathers (and thus accurate )

Great work! I didn't know there were so many known Spinosaurids until recently

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

grroselli [2012-12-09 21:25:42 +0000 UTC]

was its total length 9 meters?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

piche2 [2012-06-26 00:42:39 +0000 UTC]

esta genial

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dino-Mario [2012-05-15 07:19:11 +0000 UTC]

It's nice!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Din0scarex [2012-04-27 15:48:44 +0000 UTC]

WEIRDESS THING OF MY DAY

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheOneTrueSirCharles [2012-04-25 01:17:50 +0000 UTC]

Awesome, I think some sailfish have split sails.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheComicCreator [2012-04-25 00:58:21 +0000 UTC]

That's so interesting! Now the Spinosauroids have an "odd one out" too!
Like the short-necked saurapod or long-necked stegasauroid whose names I never seem to remember :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Teratophoneus In reply to TheComicCreator [2012-04-25 16:10:58 +0000 UTC]

you mean Brachytrachelopan and miragaia

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheComicCreator In reply to Teratophoneus [2012-04-25 23:27:37 +0000 UTC]

And I would've been right if I typed Miragaia
But yes, that's what i meant, thanks for jogging my memory

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Teratophoneus In reply to TheComicCreator [2012-04-26 18:10:36 +0000 UTC]

No problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Drachenvuur [2012-04-25 00:20:29 +0000 UTC]

Wow, a double sail; never seen that before!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Excalibur-T005 [2012-04-24 23:36:21 +0000 UTC]

Interesting. I wonder what the purpose of the split sail could have been?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RickRaptor105 In reply to Excalibur-T005 [2012-04-25 15:48:40 +0000 UTC]

Make it easier for the male to mount the female?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Excalibur-T005 In reply to RickRaptor105 [2012-04-26 22:54:23 +0000 UTC]

That's one possibility. Another is that the elimination of a semi-rigid sail of bone and skin might improve mobility.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hyrotrioskjan In reply to RickRaptor105 [2012-04-26 16:02:13 +0000 UTC]

exactly my thoughts

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

malevouvenator [2012-04-24 23:36:15 +0000 UTC]

Its from late cretaceous¿

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

malevouvenator [2012-04-24 23:35:11 +0000 UTC]

Its from late cretaceous¿

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Teratophoneus In reply to malevouvenator [2012-04-25 16:10:22 +0000 UTC]

no,early cretaceous

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RickCharlesOfficial [2012-04-24 22:35:19 +0000 UTC]

The double-sail seems rather iffy to me. It almost looks as though that segment of the sail could have "gone missing" or something, thus appearing like there is a dip in the vertebrae height. Coincidentally around the same area Concavenator's hump dips, just over the hip structure. I wonder if that is a weak area that doesn't preserve extended vertebrae well rather than an actual anatomical characteristic.

But what do I know?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Excalibur-T005 In reply to RickCharlesOfficial [2012-04-24 23:39:24 +0000 UTC]

I would hope that the paleontologists responsible for classifying this species and drawing the conclusion about the split sail would not have made that conclusion if the vertebrae over the hips were not complete enough to be sure.

With regards to the strength of the area, the vertebrae near the hips tend to be stronger (and thus, likelier to be preserved) than those in the tail, because they are some of the thickest and heaviest vertebrae.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LavaZombie [2012-04-24 20:56:05 +0000 UTC]

These dinosaurs just keep getting more and more bizarre.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

quicksilver123 [2012-04-24 20:52:02 +0000 UTC]

love the art. but how do you know that there's two sails? could it just be a single sail with a broken vertebra?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Teratophoneus In reply to quicksilver123 [2012-04-25 16:09:08 +0000 UTC]

I thought of that too. But there arent any photos of the holotype, so I cant say for sure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

quicksilver123 In reply to Teratophoneus [2012-04-25 18:52:25 +0000 UTC]

there should be a paratype to support the new specie claim... but yeah, i cant find the paper either. maybe it'll surface up in a later date.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DrawingDinosaurs [2012-04-24 19:51:39 +0000 UTC]

Makes you wonder why the sail was like that, eh?
Great job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hyrotrioskjan [2012-04-24 19:42:38 +0000 UTC]

Top
Sehr sehnwert, vorallem die Schuppen unterhalb des Doppelsegels gefallen und auch die Arme kommen gut rüber (die "Bartstoppeln irritieren mich etwas aber das ist Geschmackssache)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Teratophoneus In reply to Hyrotrioskjan [2012-04-25 16:15:42 +0000 UTC]

dankesehr. Diese stoppel sollen eigentlich nur so ne art hautauswüchse sein, sieht ,find ich, irgendwie "prähistorischer" aus.
Jedenfalls, danke noch mal

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hyrotrioskjan In reply to Teratophoneus [2012-04-25 16:22:32 +0000 UTC]

Ich seh nach zwei Wochen ohne Rasur auch prähistorischer aus

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Teratophoneus In reply to Hyrotrioskjan [2012-04-25 16:42:52 +0000 UTC]

hahaha, stimmt, ich auch XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MrScribblez [2012-04-24 18:12:36 +0000 UTC]

That is a magnificent creature! You happen to know if it is related to the Baryonyx/Spinosaurus branch in any way?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheComicCreator In reply to MrScribblez [2012-04-25 00:55:56 +0000 UTC]

The description says it was closely related to Baryonyx but it lived in Asia

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrScribblez In reply to TheComicCreator [2012-04-25 12:34:39 +0000 UTC]

Aww darn, the one time I didn't read it. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheComicCreator In reply to MrScribblez [2012-04-25 23:27:54 +0000 UTC]

No prob!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OldDocHudsonandCO [2012-04-24 17:59:20 +0000 UTC]

Well, I would never of thunk it!
Amazing, how complete were the remains when found?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gytalf2000 [2012-04-24 17:55:21 +0000 UTC]

Wow! Fascinating!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0