HOME | DD

tgrq β€” Iconostatis 360 pano 2 by-nc-nd

Published: 2006-12-02 05:55:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 1068; Favourites: 12; Downloads: 24
Redirect to original
Description 30 photos with head NN3
camera panasonic LX1

Ortodox Church Santisima Trinidad, Buenos Aires Argentina
his church was inaugurated in 1904, the original project was carried out by the architect Mihail Preobrazensky (Sacred Synod of Russia) and adapted by architect Alejandro Christophersen. The temple has been built as per XVII century Muscovite style. From the gorge of the park, on Brasil Street, we can admire the facade of the church, with the group of five domes standing out on top. These domes are onion-shaped, turquoise (a bigger one and other minor four), recovered with foils of zinc. On each one of these domes, you see a cross toward the east, held by chains. The facade is composed by a great fronton, three windows in stained glass representing different biblical scenes and the frontispiece in Venetian mosaic, representing the Santisima Trinidad (made in San Petersburgo).
Related content
Comments: 47

Katterrena [2006-12-15 22:46:42 +0000 UTC]

Amazingly gorgeous!!! Beautiful, beautiful place.

Something that is kind of entertaining is that the two half circles on either side of the photo look like they are projecting forward rather then going back away from the viewer.

Was this done with a fish-eye lens?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to Katterrena [2006-12-15 23:00:48 +0000 UTC]

no i use panorama head

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Katterrena In reply to tgrq [2006-12-15 23:52:30 +0000 UTC]

Okay, is it similar to a fish-eye?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to Katterrena [2006-12-16 02:59:44 +0000 UTC]

mmm no, but if you will yes. (i dont remember)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Katterrena In reply to tgrq [2006-12-16 05:11:46 +0000 UTC]

You're being SOOOOOOOOOOO helpful!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to Katterrena [2006-12-16 06:05:45 +0000 UTC]

lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Katterrena In reply to tgrq [2006-12-16 07:02:16 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gerhardt [2006-12-05 23:50:27 +0000 UTC]

Great of you to share such a large file, the details and colours are absolutely exquisite! The smooth sleek clarity of the tones only add to the enjoyment of this arcitectural delight. Perfecet as a pano format! A pleasure to share my friend! cheers, Gerhardt

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to gerhardt [2006-12-06 00:37:51 +0000 UTC]

your welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

quitronic [2006-12-05 16:33:37 +0000 UTC]

no hay mucho que decir...
maestrisima

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to quitronic [2006-12-05 16:37:22 +0000 UTC]

jajajaj la camara es una merda.
pero es mejor que nada

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

quitronic In reply to tgrq [2006-12-05 17:18:23 +0000 UTC]

obvio... siempre algo es mejor nada...
aunque no entiendo porque dices que la camara es una mierda... me explicas? ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to quitronic [2006-12-05 18:16:23 +0000 UTC]

la panasonic lx1 tiene muchos problemas, el principal es que genera mucho noise en sus fotos y su ccd no es muy preciso, no digo que no sea una camara buena para sacar fotos familiares ni para amateurs pero para sacar fotos profesionales tiene muchos defectos.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

quitronic In reply to tgrq [2006-12-05 20:28:04 +0000 UTC]

ah ok... te entendi mal...
para un nivel de fotografia avanzado [como el tuyo ] no es una buena camara, se entiende!
Lastima que la mia es similar

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to quitronic [2006-12-05 21:33:48 +0000 UTC]

la camara es buena pero en iso mas de 100 tira mucho ruido, y digo muchoooo.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

quitronic In reply to tgrq [2006-12-05 21:44:02 +0000 UTC]

es tan desagradable eso... cuando quieres sacar una foto nocturna el negro se ve tan sucio! aahhh me acuerdo y me molesta!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to quitronic [2006-12-06 00:36:27 +0000 UTC]

viste!!!!! pero creo que ahora lo arreglron en los nuevos modelos.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

quitronic In reply to tgrq [2006-12-06 01:17:18 +0000 UTC]

que informado!

saludos mi estimado...
se cuida!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

implosion3 [2006-12-04 21:39:02 +0000 UTC]

Very nice, a fantastic setting for a pano

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to implosion3 [2006-12-04 22:36:59 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

stetre76 [2006-12-04 08:31:53 +0000 UTC]

this series is fantastic - perfect captures and stunning colors

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to stetre76 [2006-12-04 14:26:32 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cappaholic [2006-12-04 04:34:37 +0000 UTC]

That's it. I'm going to have to buy a new tripod and pano head now

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to cappaholic [2006-12-04 05:42:21 +0000 UTC]

lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

icanbeyourangel [2006-12-03 04:36:19 +0000 UTC]

Stunning!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to icanbeyourangel [2006-12-03 06:01:19 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

icanbeyourangel In reply to tgrq [2006-12-08 13:50:33 +0000 UTC]

welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

seascape21 [2006-12-03 02:41:49 +0000 UTC]

Wicked!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to seascape21 [2006-12-03 02:50:35 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

seascape21 In reply to tgrq [2006-12-04 01:36:32 +0000 UTC]

youre welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Bonfire22 [2006-12-02 22:53:18 +0000 UTC]

jjaja estas re caliente q no tenes la minolta!!
(no es gracioso, ya se)
A por cierto, buena la foto!! que buena luz che!
En calle Brasil? por San Telmo?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to Bonfire22 [2006-12-02 22:54:16 +0000 UTC]

sep

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

eisenkalk [2006-12-02 19:41:22 +0000 UTC]

nice. just don't like the cut off pictures...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to eisenkalk [2006-12-02 20:58:42 +0000 UTC]

lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

everydayrenee [2006-12-02 19:02:28 +0000 UTC]

Very cool. I just uploaded a pano this week -- and it wouldn't size it right. It keeps making it quarter-sized. I thought maybe DA changed things. Any clue why I am having trouble?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to everydayrenee [2006-12-02 20:58:46 +0000 UTC]

no have any idea

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Samuki [2006-12-02 19:01:22 +0000 UTC]

muy buena foto!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to Samuki [2006-12-02 20:57:46 +0000 UTC]

gracias y la camara es una mierda en comparacion a mi minolta rota.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lighttouch [2006-12-02 18:34:08 +0000 UTC]

WOW! 30 photos!!!!!! Impressive!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to lighttouch [2006-12-02 20:59:57 +0000 UTC]

yea the camera suck but my new head for panos fix much troubles.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Larem [2006-12-02 16:01:09 +0000 UTC]

increìble!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to Larem [2006-12-02 16:12:57 +0000 UTC]

gracias

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

davincipoppalag [2006-12-02 09:49:49 +0000 UTC]

Great...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to davincipoppalag [2006-12-02 13:57:50 +0000 UTC]

thanks so much dude!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davincipoppalag In reply to tgrq [2006-12-03 03:59:18 +0000 UTC]

very welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

primulatook [2006-12-02 06:18:26 +0000 UTC]

What a lovely room. So ornate, so detailed....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tgrq In reply to primulatook [2006-12-02 13:52:46 +0000 UTC]

thanks to the rusian zar.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0