HOME | DD

TheMaskofaFox — Link Transformation (Gender Bender)

#change #female #girl #link #sexy #transformation #woman #zelda #rule63 #new #sexchage #genderbender
Published: 2014-10-07 06:06:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 338051; Favourites: 2077; Downloads: 1357
Redirect to original
Description >>First<<

As requested, Link transformation. Enjoy!
Related content
Comments: 241

MrsArlert In reply to ??? [2014-10-14 21:42:16 +0000 UTC]

You are so far from right that it hurts. As Unimpression said earlier the body would be exactly the same and no where in the game does it say that Link is a CIS gender male. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Squirates In reply to MrsArlert [2014-10-16 17:55:02 +0000 UTC]

and no where in the game does it say he isn't a CIS gender male
but it's extremely safe to assume he is as 
1. The Legend of Zelda is a family friendly franchise made by a family friendly company
and
2. since it is not stated the artist is allowed to assume anything he wants

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheMaskofaFox In reply to MrsArlert [2014-10-16 08:48:07 +0000 UTC]

My dialogue with Unimpression seems to have broken down, but I am willing to continue this conversation with you. I understand that you are a friend of Unimpression and being so are inclined to take Unimpression's side. To reiterate in no way was this piece of art intended to marginalize or put down anyone. I was just drawing what I enjoy drawing.

 

First I would like to start by acknowledging that you are right to point out that Zelda Lore does not confirm that Link is a CIS gender male, to my knowledge. I just took artistic license, as many fan artist do and decided to say link identifies as male.

 

Secondly, I also agree with Unimpression that if link was a boy, girl or nonbinary, link could have the same body, hair clothes and everything. (different gender identities can accompany any sex) But, as already explained that would be an entirely different piece of art work. This piece of art is part of the well established "gender bender" genre, which involve sex changes. Here is more on the genre: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darezzi In reply to ??? [2014-10-09 06:39:42 +0000 UTC]

I mean, isn't this the exact opposite of transphobic? And why would it be sexist if it depicts a very famous character in both male and female form? I don't get what you're trying to say. Plus, this is like super tame, dude, if you're this sensitive, you really don't want to go any deeper.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

TheMaskofaFox In reply to darezzi [2014-10-14 02:05:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for defend my art work. I appreciated it. Still not entirely sure what Unimpression finds disagreeable with the work in question.

Again, thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darezzi In reply to TheMaskofaFox [2014-10-15 13:56:06 +0000 UTC]

No sweat, dude! I love your art! I honestly really wanna try out being a girl for a short time, ya know, because of the bewbs ^^ and your art is super cute and non-invasive. Keep up the good work, and thanks for replying!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Horus2299 In reply to darezzi [2014-10-09 19:19:29 +0000 UTC]

Don't even bother replying. We're apparently dealing with a person who thinks gender doesn't exist, and a fully clothed, realistically proportioned woman is "overly sexualized".

Reasoning isn't going to accomplish anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-14 22:30:11 +0000 UTC]

1. I never said gender doesn't exist. I'm saying I know more about gender because you just completely disregarded the existence of anyone of a nonbinary gender.
2. "Big boobs, shorter dress, long hair, exaggerated curves, stockings and a garter belt, this face: >//////< = Realistic woman" -You

You're a dumbass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-10-15 04:04:53 +0000 UTC]

Well excuuuse me, Princess!

Your exact words were "There is no such thing as an 'opposite gender'" Just because alternate gender identities exist, that doesn't mean "male" and "female" aren't considered opposites in virtually every human culture. I haven't disregarded anything in claiming that male and female are opposite. That's an observable fact whether we're discussing biological sex or gender.

2. big boobs- big perhaps, but not unrealistically so- they could easily be natural | shorter dress- It's pretty much the same exact clothing, it only changed because of the body shape | long hair- yes, complete with suspension of disbelief. Really? It was a magic spell of some kind, you don't have to get all bent out of shape over it. | exaggerated curves- this is subjective, and you're only 13. Trust me, if you spend enough time on the internet, you'll come across far worse than this | stockings- I shouldn't even have to justify the clothing changes, because I said "realistically proportioned", without commenting on what she was wearing other than calling it "fully clothed" | garter belt- *see shorter dress/stockings* | face- Wait, what? I think that's an easily justified reaction to having your biological sex forcibly altered. Would you disagree?

I really just think you're being paranoid here, and would be wise to look for something better to do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

PAPERFAG In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-15 17:24:08 +0000 UTC]

Stop masturbating to the porn of my people

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-10-15 19:53:19 +0000 UTC]

...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

PAPERFAG In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-16 00:50:14 +0000 UTC]

u think ur smarter thn me cuz ur an adult but im mor educated cuz i know more and you think u no more tan me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Suki-ai-chan In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-15 20:24:03 +0000 UTC]

You think this is a mother fucking game?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to Suki-ai-chan [2014-10-15 21:47:40 +0000 UTC]

Oh no, clearly this is srs business.

Srsly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Suki-ai-chan In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-17 06:10:52 +0000 UTC]

Your a twat   

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PAPERFAG In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-17 02:15:06 +0000 UTC]

U is a bitch and i aint mad

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-10-17 02:58:43 +0000 UTC]

Wow, you really don't know when to quit.

Why don't you leave Mask alone, and go be offended by something else? akuoreo.deviantart.com/art/Com…

Or better yet: akuoreo.deviantart.com/gallery…

...you're welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-17 03:34:19 +0000 UTC]

I've seen worse

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-10-17 04:09:25 +0000 UTC]

So if you have seen worse, then why the heck did you flip out over this, and not everyone else on DA who does the exact same thing?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-17 04:14:30 +0000 UTC]

I didn't flip out, I told the artist in my opinion it was disgusting. It was his fans nagging me and spamming my inbox that made me flip, because you pervs can't keep words in your mouth just as much as you can't keep your dick in your pants.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-10-17 04:37:34 +0000 UTC]

Well I'm sorry about people spamming your inbox, I don't agree with a lot of what you said, but you still don't deserve to be harassed.

Even so, I think you're being a hypocrite if you got offended by this art, and not by other art that depicts similar transformations, much of which is far more "over sexualized" than this piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-17 06:18:33 +0000 UTC]

I'm not getting offended because I've realized getting offended will get you made fun of and harassed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-10-17 06:50:21 +0000 UTC]

Well thank God!  

Some people never learn that lesson, it's a bit sad really.

Also, that isn't specific to this subculture. It's pretty much a general principle on the internet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-17 22:23:30 +0000 UTC]

Ok, so, we've settled our differences. Now i get less spam, so id now like to ONLY discuss this with maskofafox, and have no one else get involved.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-10-18 01:09:08 +0000 UTC]

Ok, whatever.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Squirates In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-15 04:12:52 +0000 UTC]

I completely agree and considering he/she has been going on about it for about a week now is kind of...
idiotic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to Squirates [2014-10-15 04:22:24 +0000 UTC]

I'm just about done with this kid and his/her/? crap. I most likely won't even make any further responses to it(?).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Squirates In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-15 04:25:30 +0000 UTC]

he/she is either doesn't know what he/she is talking about or is a troll

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to Squirates [2014-10-15 04:33:58 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, although I get the impression it's the former, especially considering the age.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

TheMaskofaFox In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-18 02:09:06 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, am starting to think that as well, reading over these recent comments. Not constructive at all, just name calling. This has gone on long enough, going to end it with a ceasefire or blocking of comments.

Thanks for all your support. I appreciate it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Horus2299 In reply to TheMaskofaFox [2014-10-18 02:45:48 +0000 UTC]

At some point, this whole situation just turned into a Hydra- cut off one head, and three more take its place.

The faster you kill it, the better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheMaskofaFox In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-20 20:54:44 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, good analogy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Squirates In reply to Horus2299 [2014-10-15 05:23:01 +0000 UTC]

most likely

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PAPERFAG In reply to darezzi [2014-10-09 16:02:01 +0000 UTC]

Actually you're wrong.
1. There is no such thing as an "opposite gender" 
2. So if Link is normal as a boy, I guess that means a normal girl is an overly sexualized one, right?
3. Links body parts have nothing to do with you...!!! Unless his creator said he was a cis male, how do you know his "opposite gender" is some big boobed moe?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sampleguy In reply to ??? [2014-10-08 20:06:45 +0000 UTC]

He's just looking for a fight. No one take the bait.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to sampleguy [2014-10-09 16:02:51 +0000 UTC]

I think you messaged the wrong person 
It doesn't take skill to point out transphobia

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FinalSage In reply to ??? [2014-10-07 10:47:10 +0000 UTC]

his problem is that something tame on the internet offended him.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to FinalSage [2014-10-14 22:32:41 +0000 UTC]

"Tame" You don't understand. This is overly sexualizing and fetishizing MY LIFE and the entire lgbtqa community- Honestly, if you find "trannys" hot, and sexy and that's the porn you like to masturbate to, please don't rub it in a trans person's face.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FinalSage In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-11-16 12:21:44 +0000 UTC]

No no your right, I hear where your coming from. I once ate a burrito but got burnt by it, then I had to watch a commercial of someone happily eating a burrito: How DARE they, don't they know how I've suffered? Don't they care?
Not everything is about your life, little known fact, most everything is not about your life, hell I never heard of you before, and I DOUBT your a gender swapping, time traveling, triforce bearing hero. If you however are the legendary hero sent to save us from Ganadorf, I apologize and wish to offer you a quest for a bottle. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to FinalSage [2014-11-17 00:47:23 +0000 UTC]

You nerds have disappointing arguments. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

docterzero In reply to ??? [2014-10-07 06:07:16 +0000 UTC]

Cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheMaskofaFox In reply to docterzero [2014-10-10 02:17:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

docterzero In reply to TheMaskofaFox [2014-10-10 06:55:02 +0000 UTC]

Not anything close to a problem...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to docterzero [2014-10-14 22:32:56 +0000 UTC]

how is this not a problem?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

docterzero In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-10-15 07:14:12 +0000 UTC]

Well simply I don't have any problems for me to like somebody's artwork, and express that I do like it...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PAPERFAG In reply to docterzero [2014-10-15 17:22:03 +0000 UTC]

I'll admit, they are good at drawing, but this piece is just soo transphobic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

docterzero In reply to PAPERFAG [2014-10-16 09:35:09 +0000 UTC]

How..?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

TheMaskofaFox In reply to docterzero [2014-10-16 22:39:01 +0000 UTC]

It is not, nor was it intended to be. I would argue it is the opposite.

I apologize for the mix up, but I think that you are getting drawn into a disagreement by mistake. It looked like your first comment was a response to one of the comments Unimpression made.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

docterzero In reply to TheMaskofaFox [2014-10-17 09:23:27 +0000 UTC]

Yeah this is getting pretty confusing...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PAPERFAG In reply to docterzero [2014-10-16 16:09:43 +0000 UTC]

1. Starting that a normal boy= super sexy overly sexualized girl
2. Assuming link has a penis
3. Saying "opposite gender" when there is no opposite gender (nonbinary genders exist)
4. Changing the characters appearance when technically, if link were any gender but male, he'd still have the exact same character design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>