HOME | DD

tistwas — 15.02.10

Published: 2010-02-15 13:18:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 1838; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Day two hundred and seventy.

To view the rest of my "You Learn Something New Every Day" project, click here:

[link]

For backgrounds and textures, click here:

[link]

Related content
Comments: 18

cagalliyuuna [2010-04-07 14:49:21 +0000 UTC]

he was a nine-month-old king? wow!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-fishy-one [2010-02-20 18:47:42 +0000 UTC]

Nine MONTHS?! I knew that some kings were chosen at very young ages, but nine MONTHS?! Thank you for the info, twas helpfull!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ClairClairSky [2010-02-16 03:24:44 +0000 UTC]

Way to go.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tistwas In reply to ClairClairSky [2010-02-19 14:49:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TraceurNick [2010-02-16 02:04:23 +0000 UTC]

PIIIIIIMP!! xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Victoria0 In reply to TraceurNick [2010-02-28 08:18:08 +0000 UTC]

LOL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

number1jennyfan [2010-02-15 18:14:22 +0000 UTC]

O_O OH FUCK

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

munchinees [2010-02-15 13:49:46 +0000 UTC]

That is . So does that mean that King Tut is not the youngest King anymore? .. I always get confused with the different Henrys but the one I remembered the most has got to be King Henry VIII. He is like a merciless womanizer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

tistwas In reply to munchinees [2010-02-19 14:49:39 +0000 UTC]

Henry VIII is the only one that sticks in my mind too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ClairClairSky In reply to munchinees [2010-02-16 03:24:25 +0000 UTC]

Tut wasn't a king. He was a Pharoah, practically a God.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munchinees In reply to ClairClairSky [2010-02-16 06:47:36 +0000 UTC]

Isn't a Pharoah a ruler? Just like how a king is a ruler? In fact, he changed his name from Tutankhaten to Tutankhamun because he worships the deity Amun instead of Aten.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ClairClairSky In reply to munchinees [2010-02-16 10:23:41 +0000 UTC]

Yes, they were the rulers of the ancient Egyptions. But, they were on par with Gods. They were considered earthbound Gods.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munchinees In reply to ClairClairSky [2010-02-16 11:57:14 +0000 UTC]

I don't really see how is that different since many considered King Tut as the youngest king hence my question..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ClairClairSky In reply to munchinees [2010-02-17 05:00:07 +0000 UTC]

Well, many consider defibrillators as things that are used to start up hearts again after a person has gone into cardiac arrest.

That does not make it true (It isn't true).

Your question does not make any sence. Algerbraically speaking... Its main structure is fundamentally correct but it uses uncommon terms and is, therefore, not compatible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munchinees In reply to ClairClairSky [2010-02-17 06:13:35 +0000 UTC]

Really?

Try typing in proper English then I will try to understand where you are coming from. I don't even understand what you typed except for the first paragraph.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ClairClairSky In reply to munchinees [2010-02-17 09:08:00 +0000 UTC]

Well, many consider defibrillators as things that are used to start up hearts again after a person has gone into cardiac arrest.

That does not make it true (It isn't true).

Your question does not make any sence. Algebraically speaking... Its main structure is fundamentally correct but it uses uncommon terms and is, therefore, not compatible.

Is it the bolded part you don't understand? I don't see why. It not exactly crpytic. And, for your information, the English is perfect.

Sigh... Basically, you're trying compare a stone to a boulder. They're different things. You can't.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munchinees In reply to ClairClairSky [2010-02-17 16:12:13 +0000 UTC]

So what does "That does not make it true (It isn't true)" means exactly? Is it true or false?

Yeap. That whole bolded paragraph.

Aren't a stone and a boulder similar? They are just different in size!

I just don't get as to why you have to make such a huge thing about this. All I wanted to know was who is the youngest King. King Tut might not be a king based on where you come/learn from but from MY UNDERSTANDING, he is a king and that is it.

Thanks for your time anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ClairClairSky In reply to munchinees [2010-02-18 02:18:38 +0000 UTC]

... It is false that defibrillators start up hearts. That is only in the movies.

No they're not. If you've done geography, you'll know that they are two completely different things that are created by completely different processes.

I'm not making a big deal out of it, I just stated the facts, laid them out on the table. Forgive me but it was you who took it out of context and made a big deal out of it.

You have your own opinion, great! But, take for example, a person who thinks vegetables are bad for you. It may be his opinion but it is still wrong.

Got it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0