HOME | DD

#botany #ginkgo #jurassic #palaeontography #palaeontology #plants #trees #palaeobotany
Published: 2018-04-24 23:20:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 4795; Favourites: 162; Downloads: 36
Redirect to original
Description
Specifically of the Kimmeridgian of Utah.Related content
Comments: 11
BrendanRizzo [2018-04-24 23:24:51 +0000 UTC]
Amazing. I wonder what diversity the Ginkgophyta could have had if it hadnβt dwindled to just a single species.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Jdailey1991 In reply to BrendanRizzo [2018-04-25 04:17:12 +0000 UTC]
I've asked that question several times without a proper answer.
π: 0 β©: 1
JurassicJacob In reply to Jdailey1991 [2018-04-25 07:19:20 +0000 UTC]
I mea, itβs not really the sort of thing that thereβs a proper answer too so its not exactly unexpected that you never got a proper answer.
π: 0 β©: 1
Jdailey1991 In reply to JurassicJacob [2018-04-25 13:17:33 +0000 UTC]
Well, there should be.Β I mean, what makes ginkgophytes different from pinophytes or angiosperms?Β What environmental conditions did they need to survive?
π: 0 β©: 1
JurassicJacob In reply to Jdailey1991 [2018-04-27 14:16:28 +0000 UTC]
Those are questions that can be answered, but not by me. But I'm curious, how do you believe that a hypothetical question have a definite answer?
π: 0 β©: 1
Jdailey1991 In reply to JurassicJacob [2018-04-27 15:12:56 +0000 UTC]
Hypothetical?Β The past diversity of the ginkgophytes is concrete evidence--how is this hypothetical?
π: 0 β©: 1
JurassicJacob In reply to Jdailey1991 [2018-04-27 16:31:17 +0000 UTC]
Original question: 'what diversity the Ginkgophyta could have had if it hadnβt dwindled to just a single species'. Emphasis on could.
π: 0 β©: 1
Jdailey1991 In reply to JurassicJacob [2018-04-27 19:54:52 +0000 UTC]
That doesn't answer the question on how it ultimately lost to the angiosperms.
π: 0 β©: 1
JurassicJacob In reply to Jdailey1991 [2018-04-28 09:47:17 +0000 UTC]
'what diversity the Ginkgophyta could have had if it hadn't dwindled to a single species' was the original question, which you said you'd 'asked several times without a proper answer'. What I'm saying is that it was a hypothetical question, and that therefore there isn't a proper answer.
Other questions, on the other hand:
what makes ginkgophytes different from pinophytes or angiosperms?
What environmental conditions did they need to survive?
how it ultimately lost to the angiosperms?
These are questions that can be answered more easily because they actually happened, ie, not hypothetical. I feel like you've misunderstood what I'm trying to say, I suggest you reread this comment chain from the beginning to understand what I'm getting at.
π: 0 β©: 0