HOME | DD
Tomozaurus β Tyrannosauroid integument composite
by-nc-nd
#albertosaurus #dilong #feathers #gorgosaurus #palaeoart #palaeontography #scales #skin #tarbosaurus #theropoda #tyrannosaurus #tyrannosauridae #tomozaurus #proceratosauridae #yutyrannus #tyrannosauroidea
Published: 2017-06-12 01:52:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 29914; Favourites: 416; Downloads: 148
Redirect to original
Description
At the time of writing, this represents a hypothetical one-size-fits-all integument that would be technically accurate for everything from Yutyrannus to Tyrannosaurus, but note that I would not consider this the most likely scenario for either. It is likely however that an animal intermediate between the two (such as the Appalachiosaurus pictured) would possess a transitional covering as shown.Additional note: the scales on the illustration have been exaggerated on the areas they are preserved to denote their presence. In reality, the reticulae are so tiny they'd be indescribable from this distance.
Related content
Comments: 83
i am wondering that too. I think he might not even be aware of them.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well I do not blame him. These skin impressions were found kinda recently and it will certainly take some time until they make it to a scientific study
π: 0 β©: 1
Detrich was not found recently. But there are more integuments coming.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
I was actuallt not talking about Detrich, but about the skin impressions on the back
π: 0 β©: 0
Fantastic! I feel like most, if not all, tyrannosaurs had some kind of feathering, be it very sparse like the hairs of an elephant or a heavier coat (Nanuqsaurus must have had feathers, I can't imagine a scaly animal in those frigid conditions)
π: 0 β©: 0
nice thing pointing out that Tyrannosaurs didn't just have been completely covered by feathers nor scales, but these Tyrannosaurs had both feathers and scales.
π: 0 β©: 1
Honestly I think it is most likely that basal tyrannosauroids were completely covered in feathers and tyrannosaurids were completely covered in scales, but there had to have been a transition point somewhere.
π: 0 β©: 1
oh ok.
i have still friends, TheGreatAllosaur and Artapon pointing out quite an different thing.
π: 0 β©: 0
You are making a chimera out of not so closely related tyrannosaroids
π: 0 β©: 2
That is literally the point.
π: 1 β©: 0
You should use members of the Tyrannosauridae family for phylogenetic bracketing, since we have data from the closest relatives of t.rex
π: 0 β©: 2
Note that the animal depicted is Appalachiosaurus, which is not in the Tyrannosauridae.
π: 0 β©: 0
He has used that data. But that data left many gaps, which were filled by more basal tyrannosauroids.
π: 0 β©: 0
is there evidence for a throught pouch?
π: 0 β©: 1
can you send me a link, id like to learn more about that
π: 0 β©: 0
This is great, I heard treys video had mistakes.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks, this is really useful!
No mention of the Daspletosaur specimen, though? Did they ever figure out if it had lips or not, no ones really settled that issue.
π: 0 β©: 1
No mention of it because it's trash.
π: 0 β©: 1
Why? I know the research paper isn't up to snuff, but the cornified skin stuff is still data.
π: 0 β©: 1
GREAT!
We need to stop this war of feathers vs scales.
Clearly the late cretaceous Tyrannosaurs had most of their bodies with scales...BUT...not all of the body was scaled until the palentologists found more evidence of that.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yutyrannus is more like gigantosaurs than t.rex
π: 0 β©: 2
WARNING: LVL 8 TROLL DETECTEDΒ
DO NOT FEED
π: 0 β©: 1
you just think i am n0t seriously ??
yutyrannus is related to gigantosaurs
and yoir sound like those feathernazis now
π: 0 β©: 2
yutyrannnus is feika toh
π: 0 β©: 0
No, it's just that I know what you really are.
A troll. And nothing more.
π: 0 β©: 1
not true
you said that because you hate that none featherhead t.rex
π: 0 β©: 1
Naw.
I call you a troll because I found your YouTube alts boi
www.youtube.com/channel/UCuYO-β¦
www.youtube.com/channel/UCq4wQβ¦
www.youtube.com/channel/UClVCmβ¦
www.youtube.com/channel/UCEyFFβ¦
They are all the same except for the names.
π: 0 β©: 1
you are a troll too look to this 12monkehs.deviantart.com/art/Aβ¦
π: 0 β©: 2
That makes sense, a tyrannosaur is closer related to a carnosaur rather than another tyrannosaurΒ
ARE YOU DUMB?
π: 0 β©: 0
Here is your answer for your tiger trap:
s2.postimg.org/5oam8dgs9/IMG_1β¦
And before you banter about the account being an alt, here is the account's videos.
www.youtube.com/channel/UCjsUhβ¦
WHY WOULD I BE INTERESTED IN THIS CRAPΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
so what about this XD
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgJky0β¦
i am sure you going to like it caz the winner is a featherhead dinosaur XD
π: 0 β©: 1
What does that video have to do with anything other than pointing out the feathered dinosaur thing-oh wait.
π: 0 β©: 1
there's a featherhead dinosaur in the video
π: 0 β©: 1
Not sure if you're a troll or have too many chromosomes...
π: 0 β©: 1
Your "arguments" contain nothing but personal opinion, bias, and unintelligible babbling.
π: 0 β©: 1
"Your "arguments" contain nothing but personal opinion, bias, and unintelligible babbling."
Pretty much almost every comments from all TPCKRULEZ accounts in a nutshell.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dafuq?
Giganotosaurus it's a Allosaurid
Yutyrannus it's a Proceratosaurid/Tyrannosaur
The Carcharodontosaur's family only have the evidence of Concavenator with feathers.
π: 0 β©: 1
where did you get that? ? from youtubers
π: 0 β©: 3
80% of featherhead fossils from china π¨π³ there's secret
π: 1 β©: 2
very great art of that Dragon
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>