HOME | DD

TwilightAmbiance — Complex Understanding by-nc-nd

Published: 2007-03-21 01:54:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 1048; Favourites: 28; Downloads: 47
Redirect to original
Description Created with Apophysis 2.05b Z+.

Wow, this took a whopping three hours to render, but I'm satisfied with it. Hope you are, too!

Comments greatly appreciated.
Related content
Comments: 32

VitalRemnants [2012-02-07 05:33:23 +0000 UTC]

For some reason, this brings to mind watching a sunset in a coffee-shop. Love it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sigma-Echo-Seven [2009-12-04 05:04:15 +0000 UTC]

Cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Phoenix-22 [2007-04-06 18:15:41 +0000 UTC]

Now that's pretty cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to Phoenix-22 [2007-04-07 01:53:01 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wick5ter [2007-03-25 17:33:07 +0000 UTC]

thats really cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to Wick5ter [2007-03-25 18:46:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, buddy!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

live2b [2007-03-22 01:46:20 +0000 UTC]

This is really fantastic!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to live2b [2007-03-22 04:34:02 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

live2b In reply to TwilightAmbiance [2007-03-22 22:40:33 +0000 UTC]

Welcome!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thammuz [2007-03-21 19:08:10 +0000 UTC]

I really like the pastel-ey results of such a long render, tis a good looking image

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to Thammuz [2007-03-21 22:59:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanks much, Thammuz!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NatalieKelsey [2007-03-21 17:04:03 +0000 UTC]

So cool! Looks even better than the params did yesterday!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to NatalieKelsey [2007-03-21 22:59:23 +0000 UTC]

Those params and their cheap-looking-ness...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NatalieKelsey In reply to TwilightAmbiance [2007-03-22 14:40:43 +0000 UTC]

Well, this certainly didn't turn out cheap. It's awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ab1lity [2007-03-21 15:24:14 +0000 UTC]

Awesome work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to Ab1lity [2007-03-21 22:58:57 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonDork [2007-03-21 14:11:29 +0000 UTC]

Amazing job i love the colors and how all the thingy (nice word i know) in the middle contrasts w/ the definite shapes surrounding it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to DragonDork [2007-03-21 22:58:50 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ibon16 [2007-03-21 03:45:10 +0000 UTC]

complex indeed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to ibon16 [2007-03-21 04:23:59 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Stock-By-Michelle [2007-03-21 03:22:31 +0000 UTC]

Totally cool looking and beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to Stock-By-Michelle [2007-03-21 04:26:15 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot for the comment, mousgal!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

phoenix75 [2007-03-21 02:21:30 +0000 UTC]

I really like this one, too. Great colors and design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to phoenix75 [2007-03-21 02:57:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lobH [2007-03-21 02:04:24 +0000 UTC]

might just be me, but doesn't look like hte middle fits too well with the background... but i like it nonetheless.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to lobH [2007-03-21 02:11:20 +0000 UTC]

There really is no background, though. As you can see, the middle curves slip into the "slits" of the rest of the fractal. There is no background but black.

Just kidding, I get what you mean. Everything is kind of toned down and then BAM, there's the middle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lobH In reply to TwilightAmbiance [2007-03-21 03:16:17 +0000 UTC]

no background, but the middle seems to stick out further, making it look like their is one.

but yea, it sort of hits you like BAM.


it's a good piece though... i am digging my version of the "background"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lemoni000 [2007-03-21 01:56:17 +0000 UTC]

Wow. You have very good skills. Looks extremely complicated! Good job.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to Lemoni000 [2007-03-21 02:11:33 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lemoni000 In reply to TwilightAmbiance [2007-03-22 03:24:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jeesup58 [2007-03-21 01:55:49 +0000 UTC]

Very nice!
Someone once said, the most complicated thing to understand was yourself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwilightAmbiance In reply to jeesup58 [2007-03-21 02:11:50 +0000 UTC]

And isn't that true!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0