HOME | DD

tyklfynd β€” Polaris vs Jean, page 3 [NSFW]

Published: 2007-07-18 03:30:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 36992; Favourites: 429; Downloads: 382
Redirect to original
Description This is a repost. The deviant art nannies got me! The previous post of this picture had a link in the description that was to the UNCENSORED version, and so the post was deleted. DAMN YOU DEVIANT ART NANNIES!!! *shaking my fist and laughing at the sillyness of it all*

This post does not contain the offending link to the uncensored version, so I should be safe I hope.

So if you want to see the uncensored version; search for "tickling media forum tyklfynd page 3" on yahoo. the first link is to the wonderfullly UNCENSORED version of this pic.


... and so Polaris gets to it. She has so much more fun when her victum is aroused, so she starts slowly on her buns and errogenous zones. Teasing her gently. But what a delightful suprise Jean is, cause even with a very light and slow touch, she giggles incessently. She is more ticklish than Emma let on. "Note to self" Polaris thinks, "... take the gloves off when tickling between Emma's toes next time, she has been holding back on me." ( between the toes is Emma's worst spot)
The gentle stroking of Jean's womanly parts, and inner thighs, continued until she began to unconsciously swivle and thrust her hips. This is just as hot and bothered as Polaris likes her victums; this was her cue to move on to zones more responsive and sensitive to tickling...
Related content
Comments: 20

6206 [2014-11-27 00:14:19 +0000 UTC]

IΒ this!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

allezn [2012-01-01 18:08:33 +0000 UTC]

where are your books?
great art

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NightFury2000 [2011-04-29 18:54:12 +0000 UTC]

.....umm.......heh........... This is different...............No offense................wow..............

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Darthvegeta800 [2011-03-16 11:26:22 +0000 UTC]

Any chance we'll ever see an Emma one

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

doomie220 [2011-02-24 04:54:52 +0000 UTC]

Oh how I like way this comic ig going! X3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

moonlightfanatic [2009-12-20 22:17:40 +0000 UTC]

i looked up the uncensored and can't find it. it says "no results found"....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lornaxdane [2009-03-27 22:32:46 +0000 UTC]

Hey there:] I rp polaris and love your series. I had a good laugh with the jean i rped with:]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

storm-warning [2008-11-13 22:25:21 +0000 UTC]

this lighting rocks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fennessey88 [2008-03-09 20:19:07 +0000 UTC]

Wow. dude, A very sexy pic. If a little bit too kinky for my tastes. but that's not your fault. Very good. thanks for posting

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sampsons-princess [2007-10-01 00:38:59 +0000 UTC]

loves it! especially her reply XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ministan [2007-07-18 17:40:33 +0000 UTC]

What? They got mad because you included a link? But you didn't actually post the offending image here, right?

Yeesh!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tyklfynd In reply to ministan [2007-07-18 19:01:46 +0000 UTC]

yup, just a link. They used to never care about that, but their Nanny standards are changing. I bet in a year that you wont even be able to show genitals at all. These sorts of things frequently have a life of their own. They need to get out of the censoring business, and instead have a labeling system that not only labels things mature, but also perhaps other degrees, like "explicit". And let people decide for themselves what they want to view. Its too bad, dart is just such a cool site, but most erotic art is not art in their view. ( but how does it hurt their business to allow it? )

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ministan In reply to tyklfynd [2007-07-19 16:27:53 +0000 UTC]

Well, I know that the company I work for has ridiculously prudish 1950's "family-friendly" standards. But it's a profitable business model. So, could be they're just looking at the bottom line.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tyklfynd In reply to ministan [2007-07-20 21:38:31 +0000 UTC]

what company do you work for?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ministan In reply to tyklfynd [2007-07-21 04:59:55 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

reyalejandro [2007-07-18 14:01:01 +0000 UTC]

wow. I really dont have much to say, considering I said it all on the deleted one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tyklfynd In reply to reyalejandro [2007-07-18 19:03:04 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I wish that instead of deleting it, they could temporarily suspend or hide it until I make the fix that they want. Just wiping it out completely is unnecessary.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

reyalejandro In reply to tyklfynd [2007-07-18 22:37:55 +0000 UTC]

yeah, but I think that they can't be that advanced to do that yet. I forgot why it was deleted.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chaz2000 [2007-07-18 07:29:26 +0000 UTC]

Amazing. I love the perspective.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tyklfynd In reply to Chaz2000 [2007-07-19 01:08:40 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0