HOME | DD

Published: 2014-07-06 08:05:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 7510; Favourites: 90; Downloads: 420
Redirect to original
Description
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Cā¦Apollo CSM - byr2008
Related content
Comments: 9
bigwad73 [2014-07-10 02:28:49 +0000 UTC]
Excellently done!Ā You've got a good eye for detail!
š: 0 ā©: 0
DACantero [2014-07-09 10:22:15 +0000 UTC]
I wonder if if NASA would've shortened the service module for LEO if we had continued using Apollo instead of going with the shuttle.
š: 0 ā©: 2
bigwad73 In reply to DACantero [2014-07-10 02:36:27 +0000 UTC]
The Skylab versions were launched to LEO on a Saturn IB.Ā The SM was pretty much unchanged.Ā It was not fueled to the same quantities as the Lunar missions to offload some weight, plus a few other changes.Ā The wiki page listed above has a good synopsis of the differences.
Operating with a smaller amount of propellant and minor deletions to save mass are easier for simulations and analysis to handle than actual dimensional changes.
š: 0 ā©: 0
unusualsuspex In reply to DACantero [2014-07-09 11:05:30 +0000 UTC]
Sadly I guess we'll never know. Still, with Orion due to launch this year there may be hope for Lunar return/Mars mission in my lifetime....
š: 0 ā©: 0
SpiderTrekfan616 [2014-07-06 16:41:12 +0000 UTC]
Here's a funny tidbit of Apollo History.
š: 0 ā©: 1
Midway2009 [2014-07-06 15:08:22 +0000 UTC]
Incredible. I actually saw two of the command modules: Apollo 11 'Columbia' and Apollo 9 'Gumdrop.'
š: 0 ā©: 1
Kasterborous In reply to Midway2009 [2014-07-06 17:46:34 +0000 UTC]
Bah! Columbia grabs the spotlight. Space shuttle, NX-class starship... no love for Gumdrop
š: 0 ā©: 1
Midway2009 In reply to Kasterborous [2014-07-06 19:14:47 +0000 UTC]
That's true. But they were very cool non the less.
š: 0 ā©: 0