HOME | DD

Valendale β€” AnarchoCapitalism in a Nutshell

#anarcho #capitalism #anarchocapitalism #ancap #ancaps #ayncap #ayncaps
Published: 2014-10-21 07:24:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 3294; Favourites: 17; Downloads: 5
Redirect to original
Description AynCaps, gotta love'em
Related content
Comments: 23

smkd [2024-04-27 22:30:57 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JasonWolfe [2023-08-15 23:24:19 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Strongman20 [2020-09-24 21:01:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

JasonWolfe In reply to Strongman20 [2023-08-15 23:22:26 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Strongman20 In reply to JasonWolfe [2023-08-16 12:17:58 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JasonWolfe In reply to Strongman20 [2023-08-16 19:37:34 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chaser1992 [2019-05-31 17:52:49 +0000 UTC]

Say it's with me Monopolies are a stateist thing. Monopolies can't form under true capitalism.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

JPGuchiha [2017-10-14 16:03:51 +0000 UTC]

Long live Anarcho Capitalism!

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

zackaube [2017-06-11 17:46:28 +0000 UTC]

'Private Ownership Requires A State' - DEBUNKEDThe idea that private ownership needs the state to "protect their wealth from the majority" is so absurdly backwards that I can understand why many people struggle to refute this argument. It's something on a level of absurdity which catches people off guard when they encounter it; similar to if someone were to walk up to you out of nowhere and yell "FBI CHILD SEX AGENTS AT THE DMV ARE TORTURING ME WITH PEDOPHILE BAIT AND TRYING TO TURN ME INTO A PEDOPHILE!"
It's somewhat of an overload of your senses, because there are so many things wrong in such a short little statement.
It is specifically the state that pillages private ownership and wealth (allegedly in the name of the majority). The idea that anyone could "need" thieves to protect their wealth is one of the most severely ridiculous things I think I've ever heard (Taxation is required to hold up a state, and taxation is a coerced contribution. Coercion is theft, contribution is payment. A forced payment is theft; therefore, taxati

Monopolies cannot exist without the force of a state
www.youtube.com/watch?v=76pWdE…
Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mackattack1991 [2016-01-22 18:49:48 +0000 UTC]

I feel as though every time I debate an Anarcho-Capitalist, I lose a brain cell!

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 3

Strongman20 In reply to mackattack1991 [2020-09-24 20:56:37 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ColonelBSacquet In reply to mackattack1991 [2016-05-11 14:06:01 +0000 UTC]

Aren't they also called libertarians, by the way?

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

mackattack1991 In reply to ColonelBSacquet [2016-05-11 16:01:08 +0000 UTC]

They often call themselves that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ColonelBSacquet In reply to mackattack1991 [2016-05-11 13:52:58 +0000 UTC]

Welcome to the club, matey! :-D
I feel like that too, sometimes.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Strongman20 In reply to ColonelBSacquet [2020-09-24 20:57:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

namezong [2014-10-25 21:30:25 +0000 UTC]

+1

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

liq3 [2014-10-22 10:28:51 +0000 UTC]

I've never heard of an anarcho-capitalist advocating for giving a monopoly of power to anyone. You should try reading up on the actual position before criticizing it. www.jim.com/anarchy is a pretty good intro.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

namezong In reply to liq3 [2014-10-25 21:34:10 +0000 UTC]

They do in a sense that after removal of state the dominance and ruleship automaticaly passes to the second most powerful entety/s, in our case megabanks and transnational corps.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Strongman20 In reply to namezong [2020-09-24 20:59:06 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Valendale In reply to liq3 [2014-10-22 14:25:59 +0000 UTC]

They advocate turning a monopoly of power over to business owners and private institutions, every business has it's own internal form of government and in capitalism the power dynamics are top down, an elite minority own and control the means of production for their benefit and their control is enforced by violence.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Strongman20 In reply to Valendale [2020-09-24 21:00:07 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

34A7B [2014-10-21 17:17:05 +0000 UTC]

They help remind us what "Irony" means.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Strongman20 In reply to 34A7B [2020-09-24 21:00:23 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0